How to Make the Invisible Women of STEM Visible
Maria A. Halili A and Jennifer L. Martin A B CA Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Building N75, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
B Vice-Chancellor’s Unit, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jlm@uow.edu.au
Australian Journal of Chemistry 73(3) 75-77 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH19286
Submitted: 21 June 2019 Accepted: 31 July 2019 Published: 23 August 2019
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Although women make up more than 50 % of the population, they have long been an under-represented minority in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In chemistry, for example, only five of a total of 181 Nobel prizes (2.8 %) awarded over more than 100 years have been bestowed upon women. Closer to home, Professor Frances Separovic – the subject of this special issue of Aust. J. Chem. – was the first woman chemist elected to the Fellowship of the Australian Academy of Science. That happened very recently, in 2012. At that point in time, the Academy had been electing Fellows for nearly 60 years. The lack of visible female role models and the absence of women in prominent scientific positions may be one reason why girls and young women do not see STEM as a viable career option. After all, if you can’t see it, how can you be it? Here, we present personal accounts of our two quite different research career paths – one starting in 2010 that included a significant career disruption, the other starting 20 years earlier in 1990. We describe the challenges we have faced as women in a testosterone-rich environment, and the circumstances that allowed us to continue. We provide suggestions for addressing systemic, organisational, and social barriers to the progression of women in STEM.
References
[1] Women in STEM Decadal Plan 2019 (Australian Academy of Science: Canberra).[2] A. J. Carter, A. Croft, D. Lukas, G. M. Sandstrom, PLoS One 2018, 13, e0202743.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30260980PubMed |
[3] M. K. Feeney, ‘Why more women don’t win science Nobels’, The Conversation 2018. Available at: https://theconversation.com/why-more-women-dont-win-science-nobels-104370 (accessed 10 June 2019)
[4] C. Jones, ‘Women have been written out of science history – time to put them back’, The Conversation 2018. Available at: https://theconversation.com/women-have-been-written-out-of-science-history-time-to-put-them-back-107752 (accessed 10 June 2019)
[5] E. A. Cech, M. Blair-Loy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 4182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] A. M. Kloxin, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 287.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] S. Bell, L. Yates, Women in the Science Research Workforce: Identifying and Sustaining the Diversity Advantage 2015 (L. H. Martin Institute, University of Melbourne: Melbourne).
[8] M. Peplow, Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019, 3, 283.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[9] Diversity Landscape of the Chemical Sciences 2018 (Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge).
[10] H. Shen, Nature 2013, 495, 22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23467149PubMed |
[11] Y. Sharma, ‘Scant progress on women becoming university leaders’, University World News 2019. Available at: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20190717144930693 (accessed 22 July 2019)
[12] T. Marchant, M. Wallace, Aust. Univ. Rev. 2013, 55, 60.
[13] C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, J. Handelsman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16474.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22988126PubMed |
[14] The Athena SWAN Accreditation Framework (Science in Australia Gender Equity) 2019. Available at: https://www.sciencegenderequity.org.au/ (accessed 13 June 2019)
[15] Athena SWAN Charter (AdvanceHE) 2019. Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/equality-charters/athena-swan/ (accessed 12 June 2019)
[16] R. S. Klein, R. Voskuhl, B. M. Segal, B. N. Dittel, T. E. Lane, J. R. Bethea, M. J. Carson, C. Colton, S. Rosi, A. Anderson, L. Piccio, J. M. Goverman, E. N. Benveniste, M. A. Brown, S. K. Tiwari-Woodruff, T. H. Harris, A. H. Cross, Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 475.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28418385PubMed |
[17] R. F. Kalejta, A. C. Palmenberg, J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00739-17.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28592542PubMed |
[18] S. M. Ruzycki, S. Fletcher, M. Earp, A. Bharwani, K. C. Lithgow, J. Am. Med. Assoc. Netw Open 2019, 2, e192103.
[19] A. Casadevall, J. Handelsman, MBio 2014, 5, e00846-13.
| 25505126PubMed |
[20] A. Casadevall, MBio 2015, 6, e01146.
| 26463169PubMed |
[21] Entomological Society of America, Code of Conduct 2019. Available at: https://www.entsoc.org/conduct (accessed 12 June 2019)
[22] J. L. Martin, PLOS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003903.
| 25411977PubMed |
[23] A. J. Foxx, R. S. Barak, T. M. Lichtenberger, L. K. Richardson, A. J. Rodgers, E. W. Williams, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 14931.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31285334PubMed |
