Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > CP08412
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 60(8)

Mechanisms of nitrogen limitation affecting maize growth: a comparison of different modelling hypotheses

F. Y. Li A B D , P. D. Jamieson A , P. R. Johnstone A and A. J. Pearson C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand.

B AgResearch – Grasslands, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

C Foundation for Arable Research, PO Box 80, Lincoln, New Zealand.

D Corresponding author. Email: frank.li@agresearch.co.nz

Crop and Pasture Science 60(8) 738-752 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP08412
Submitted: 18 November 2008  Accepted: 27 May 2009   Published: 5 August 2009

Abstract

Two hypothetical mechanisms exist for quantifying crop nitrogen (N) demand and N-deficit effects on crop growth. The Critical N mechanism uses a critical N concentration, while the Leaf N mechanism distinguishes active N in leaves from the N elsewhere in shoots. These two mechanisms were implemented in parallel in a maize model (Amaize) to evaluate their adequacy in predicting crop growth and development. In the Leaf N mechanism, two approaches for quantifying N-deficit effects, by reducing green leaf area (GAI) or diluting specific leaf nitrogen (SLN), were also examined. The model-predicted plant biomass, grain yield, and N uptake were compared with measurements from 47 maize crops grown on 16 sites receiving different N fertiliser treatments. The results showed that model-predicted plant biomass, grain yield and N uptake were insensitive to the approaches used for quantifying N-deficit effects in the Leaf N mechanism. The model-predicted plant biomass, grain yield and N uptake using either N approach were significantly related to measurements (P < 0.01) but had considerable deviations (r2 = 0.66–0.69 for biomass, 0.50–0.54 for grain yield: 0.17–0.33 for N uptake). The linear fits of the predicted against measured values showed no significant difference (P > 0.1) among the three N approaches, with the Leaf N mechanism predicting smaller deviation than the Critical N mechanism. However, the Critical N mechanism was better in simulating plant growth dynamics in early plant growth stages. The Leaf N mechanism distinguished functional from structural N pools in plants, having a sound physiological base. The simulation using the Leaf N mechanism with both SLN dilution and GAI reduction for quantifying N-deficit effects was the best in predicting crop growth and yield.

Additional keywords: canopy development, Critical N concentration, green leaf area, specific leaf nitrogen, nitrogen uptake, simulation.


Acknowledgments

The development of the maize model was funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology as part of the Land Use Change and Intensification program. The field experimentation was funded by the Sustainable Farming Fund (SFF), the Foundation for Arable Research (FAR), and FertResearch. We thank D. Wilson and A. Fletcher for their comments on the manuscript, and E. Meenken for assistance with statistical analysis.


References


Addiscott TM (1977) A simple computer model for leaching in structured soil. Journal of Soil Science 28, 554–563.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Amos B, Walters DT (2006) Maize root biomass and rhizodeposited carbon: an analysis of the literature. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 1489–1503.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Aslyng HC , Hansen S (1982) Water balance and crop production simulation. Model WATCROS for local and regional application. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.

Birch CJ, Hammer GL, Rickert KG (1998) Improved methods for predicting individual leaf area and leaf senescence in maize (Zea mays). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 249–262.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Caloin M, Yu O (1984) Analysis of the time course of change in nitrogen content in Dactylis glomerata L. using a model of plant growth. Annals of Botany 54, 69–76.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Colenne C, Meynard JM, Reau R, Justes E, Merrien A (1998) Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter oilseed rape. Annals of Botany 81, 311–317.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dardanelli JL, Ritchie JT, Calmon M, Andriani JM, Collino DJ (2004) An empirical model for root water uptake. Field Crops Research 87, 59–71.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gastal F, Lemaire G (2002) N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 789–799.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Genstat Committee (2007) ‘Genstat release 9 Reference Manual, Parts 1–3.’ (Ed. RW Payne) (VSN International: Oxford, UK)

Greenwood DJ, Gastal F, Lemaire G, Draycott A, Millard P, Neeteson JJ (1991) Growth rate and percentage N of field grown crops: theory and experiments. Annals of Botany 67, 181–190.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Greenwood DJ, Lemaire G, Gosse G, Cruz P, Draycott A, Neeteson JJ (1990) Declining in percentage N of C3 and C4 crops with increasing plant mass. Annals of Botany 66, 425–436.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Greenwood DJ, Rahn C, Draycott A, Vaidyanathan LV, Paterson C (1996) Modelling and measurement of the effects of fertilizer-N and crop residue incorporation on N-dynamics in vegetable cropping. Soil Use and Management 12, 13–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hansen S, Jensen HE, Nielsen NE, Svendsen H (1991) Simulation of nitrogen dynamics and biomass production in winter wheat using the Danish simulation model Daisy. Fertilizer Research 27, 245–259.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Jamieson PD, Martin RJ, Francis GS (1995) Drought influence on grain yield of barley, wheat, and maize. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 23, 55–66. open url image1

Jamieson PD, Semenov MA (2000) Modelling nitrogen uptake and redistribution in wheat. Field Crops Research 68, 21–29.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jamieson PD, Semenov MA, Brooking IR, Francis GS (1998) Sirius: a mechanistic model of wheat response to environmental variation. European Journal of Agronomy 8, 161–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jamieson PD , Stone PJ , Zyskowski RF , Sinton S (2003) Implementation and testing of the Potato Calculator, a decision support system for nitrogen and irrigation management. In ‘Decision support systems in potato production: bringing models to practice’. (Eds AJ Haverkort, DKL Mackerron) pp. 85–99. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: The Netherlands)

Jeuffroy MH, Ney B, Qurry A (2002) Integrated physiological and agronomic modelling of N capture and use within the plant. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 809–823.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Jones CA , Kiniry JR (1986) CERES-Maize. A simulation model of maize growth and development. (Texas A&M University Press: Texas)

Justes E, Mary B, Meynard J-M, Machet J-M, Thelier-Huche L (1994) Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter wheat crops. Annals of Botany 74, 397–407.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Lemaire G, Salette J (1984) Relation entre dynamique de croissance et dynamique de prélèvement d’azote pour un peuplement de graminées fourragères. I. Etude de l’effet du milieu. Agronomie 4, 423–430.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lemaire G, van Oosterom E, Jeuffroy M-H, Gastal F, Massignam A (2008) Crop species present different qualitative types of response to N deficiency during their vegetative growth. Field Crops Research 105, 253–265.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Li FY, Jamieson PD, Pearson AJ (2006) AmaizeN: developing a decision support tool to optimise nitrogen management of maize. Agronomy New Zealand 36, 61–70. open url image1

Li FY , Jamieson PD , Pearson AJ , Arnold N (2007b) Simulating soil mineral N dynamics during maize cropping under variable nitrogen management. In ‘Designing sustainable farms’. (Eds LD Currie, JA Hanly) pp. 448–458 (Massey University: New Zealand)

Li FY , Jamieson PD , Zyskowski RF , Brown HE , Pearson AJ (2007a) The crop calculators – from simulation models to usable decision-support tools. In ‘MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation’. (Eds L Oxley, D Kulasiri) pp. 128–134. (MSSANZ: Christchurch, New Zealand) Available at: www.mssanz. au/modsim07/Papers.

Miller MH, Walker GK, Tollenaar M, Alexander KG (1989) Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) grown outdoors hydroponically and in soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 69, 295–302. open url image1

Muchow RC, Sinclair TR (1994) Nitrogen response of leaf photosynthesis and canopy radiation use efficiency in field-grown maize and sorghum. Crop Science 34, 721–727. open url image1

Muchow RC, Sinclair TR, Bennett JM (1990) Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. Agronomy Journal 82, 338–343. open url image1

Ney B , Doré T , Sagan M (1997) ‘Diagnosis of the nitrogen status in crops.’ (Ed. G Lemaire) pp. 107–117. (Springer: Berlin)

Novoa R, Loomis RS (1981) Nitrogen and plant production. Plant and Soil 58, 177–204.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Plénet D, Lemaire G (2000) Relationships between dynamics of nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation in maize crops. Determination of critical N concentration. Plant and Soil 216, 65–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Porter JR (1993) AFRCWHEAT2: A model of the growth and development of wheat incorporating responses to water and nitrogen. European Journal of Agronomy 2, 69–82. open url image1

Sinclair TR (1990) Nitrogen influence on the physiology of crop yield. In ‘Theoretical production ecology: reflections and prospects’. (Eds R Rabbinge, J Goudriaan, H van Keulen, FWT Penning de Vries, HH van Laar) pp. 41–45. (Pudoc: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Sinclair TR, Amir J (1992) A model to assess nitrogen limitations on the growth and yield of spring wheat. Field Crops Research 30, 63–78.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sinclair TR, Farias JR, Neumaier N, Nepomuceno AL (2003) Modeling nitrogen accumulation and use by soybean. Field Crops Research 81, 149–158.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sinclair TR, Horie T (1989) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Science 29, 90–98. open url image1

Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1995) Effects of nitrogen supply on maize yield. I. Modelling physiological responses. Agronomy Journal 87, 632–641. open url image1

Stewart DW, Dwyer LM (1999) Mathematical characterization of leaf shape and area of maize hybrids. Crop Science 39, 422–427. open url image1

Stockle C, Donatelli M, Nelson R (2003) CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 289–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stone P, Pearson A, Sorensen I, Rogers B (2003) Effects of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality. Agronomy New Zealand 30, 67–75. open url image1

Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vos J, van der Putten PEL (1998) Effects of nitrogen supply on leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in potato. Field Crops Research 59, 63–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vos J, van der Putten PEL, Birch CJ (2005) Effects of nitrogen supply on leaf appearance, leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research 93, 64–73. open url image1

Wilson DR, Muchow RC, Murgatroyd CJ (1995) Model analysis of temperature and solar radiation limitations to maize potential productivity in a cool climate. Field Crops Research 43, 1–18.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wolfe DW, Henderson DW, Hsiao TC, Alvino A (1988) Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. 1. Leaf area duration, nitrogen distribution, and yield & 2. Photosynthetic decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agronomy Journal 80, 859–870. open url image1

Yang HS, Dobermann A, Lindquist JL, Walters DT, Arkebauer TJ, Cassman KG (2004) Hybrid-maize—a maize simulation model that combines two crop modelling approaches. Field Crops Research 87, 131–154.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zoltan B , Lap DQ (2004) Studies on the effect of plant density on maize growth using the Richards function. In ‘New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress’. Brisbane, Australia. Available at: www.cropscience.org.au.