Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA03123
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 44(10)

The role of applied science in helping farmers to make decisions about environmental sustainability

A.M. Ridley
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Co-operative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Primary Industries Research Victoria, Chiltern Valley Road, RMB 1145, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia. Email: Anna.Ridley@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44(10) 959-968 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA03123
Submitted: 16 June 2003  Accepted: 28 April 2004   Published: 25 November 2004

Abstract

Decision making about environmental sustainability is complex, involving both factual and value-based judgements by farmers. Some of the factors involved in making these decisions, such as the financial implications and riskiness, the urgency of the problem, ease of implementation and trialling and compatibility have been addressed elsewhere. The current paper discusses a number of less-explored issues involved in this type of decision making, including the need for multiple sources of knowledge such as farmers’ values and goals, an understanding of social and demographic issues, and consideration of the catchment or landscape context in which farmers live. It highlights scientific knowledge as only one of these knowledge sources, with other sources also needed in complex decision making. Evidence from a Western Australian case study suggests that there has been a shift in farmers’ values over the past few decades and that there is now a greater responsiveness to management solutions which include environmental considerations, even among the 40% of farmers driven primarily by monetary goals. Changing social conditions, particularly the roles of women on farms and of off-farm income, suggest greater potential for the incorporation of environmental considerations into farm management. However, demographic issues, particularly issues such as limited employment opportunities, the declining provision of services in areas dominated by an agricultural economy, and the trend of increasing privatisation of extension services, suggest that there remains potential for greater environmental exploitation in some areas. The role of scientists in helping farmers to address environmental sustainability is discussed, with an acknowledgment that there are insufficient scientists with the required skills available. Scientists need to work in teams with local people to develop a sufficient depth of understanding to translate abstract research findings into solutions that are relevant at the farm level. Highly participatory approaches (which empower farmers rather merely inform them) can help scientists to understand farmers’ needs and motivations, but involve losing control of highly focused research agendas. Environmental Management Systems are one way in which scientific research and group learning can help empower farmers to understand and make better decisions about the environment.


Acknowledgments

This paper was drafted for a symposium celebrating John Passioura’s career. Thanks to Val Brown and Tony Gleeson who provided positive comments. Special thanks to Tim Paramore and Neil Barr for much discussion over the past few years.


References


Barr NF (1999) Salinity control, water reform and structural adjustment: the Tragowel Plains irrigation district. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Brown VA (1995) ‘Landcare languages; talking to each other about living with the land.’ (Australian Department of Primary Industries: Canberra, ACT)

Brown VA (2004) Knowing: linking the knowledge cultures of sustainability and health. In ‘Sustainability and health: working together’. (Eds VA Brown, J Grootjans, J Ritchie, M Townsend, G.Verrinder) (Allen and Unwin: Sydney) (in press).

Cary J, Webb T, Barr N (2002) Understanding landholders’ capacity to change to sustainable practices; insights about practice adoption and social capacity for change (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra)

Elkington J (1999) ‘Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business.’ (Capstone Publishing: United Kingdom)

Frost FM (2000) Value orientations: impact and implications in the extension of complex farming systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 511–517.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 10 October 2004).

Guerin LJ, Guerin TF (1994) Constraints to the adoption of innovations in agricultural research and environmental management: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 549–571.
| Crossref |
(verified 12 October 2004).

Lindner RK (1993) Privatising the production of knowledge; promise and pitfalls for agricultural extension. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57, 47–71. open url image1

Marsh SP, Pannell DJ (1998) The changing relationship between private- and public-sector agricultural extension in Australia. Rural Society 8, 133–151. open url image1

Mohai P (1992) Men, women and the environment: an examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society & Natural Resources 5, 1–19. open url image1

Morelli J (1999) ‘Voluntary environmental management: the inevitable future.’ (Lewis: New York)

Pretty J (1998) ‘The living land.’ (Earthscan Publications Ltd: London, UK)

Rhodes HM, Leland LS, Niven BE (2002) Farmers, streams, information and money: does informing farmers about riparian management have any effect? Environmental Management 30, 665–677.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ridley AM, Paramore T, Beverly CR, Dunin FX, Froelich VMC (2003) Developing practical monitoring tools from sustainability indicators. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 271–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM, Paramore T, Seymour E (2003) Towards ‘clean and green’ farming systems using group learning to implement Environmental Management Systems. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 637–645.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM (2005) The role of farming systems approaches in achieving sustainability in Australian agriculture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture in press 45, open url image1

Simon HA (1976) ‘Administrative behaviour: a study of decision-making processes in adminstrative organization.’ 3rd edn. (The Free Press: New York)

Stern PC (1992) Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology 43, 269–302.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 6, 81–97. open url image1

Stoneham G, Eigenraam M, Ridley AM, Barr N (2003) The application of sustainability concepts to Australian agriculture: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 195–203.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Wilkinson R, Barr N (1993) ‘Community involvement in catchment management, an evaluation of community planning in the Victorian Salinity Program.’ (Victorian Department of Agriculture: Victoria)

Wilkinson R, Parminter T (1997) Resource monitoring imperatives for extension. In ‘Proceedings of the Australasia Pacific extension network conference’. pp. 217–223 (Australasia Pacific Extension Network: Albury)