Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of grazing and herbicide treatments for lucerne removal before cropping in southern New South Wales

S. L. Davies A C , J. M. Virgona B , M. H. McCallum A D , A. D. Swan A and M. B. Peoples A E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Charles Sturt University, School of Agriculture, PO Box 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2078, Australia.

C Present address: Department of Agriculture Western Australia, PO Box 110, Geraldton, WA 6531, Australia.

D Present address: Ag Consulting Co, PO Box 70, Ardrossan, SA 5571, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: mark.peoples@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(9) 1147-1155 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04202
Submitted: 20 September 2004  Accepted: 5 April 2005   Published: 10 October 2005

Abstract

The difficulty of reliably removing an established lucerne pasture before cropping has been identified as a major problem with phase-farming systems on mixed farms. A series of experiments were undertaken on established lucerne stands at the Ginninderra Experimental Station in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and at the Temora Research Station in southern New South Wales (NSW) to compare the ability of grazing, either alone or in combination with herbicides, to remove a lucerne pasture. A pilot study at the Ginninderra Experimental Station in 1998–99 utilised a high stocking rate (30 dry sheep equivalents [dse]/ha), while the main study at the Ginninderra Experimental Station and the Temora Research Station in 1999–2000 used a lower stocking rate (10–12 dse/ha) considered to be closer to farmer practice in the region. Continuous grazing at the high stocking rate removed 73% of the lucerne stand over 3 months. In contrast, the stocking rates applied in the main study proved too low to substantially impact on lucerne survival at both the ACT and NSW sites (13–23% removal) under the good seasonal conditions experienced in 1999–2000 even though the pastures were continuously grazed for 8–9 months. The use of herbicides both alone or in conjunction with grazing greatly improved lucerne removal in both studies. However, herbicide efficacy was variable (53–100% removal), and seemed to be related to the time of year it was applied, the period of lucerne regrowth or the amount of rainfall before herbicide application.

An additional on-farm study was undertaken near Junee Reefs in southern NSW between 2001 and 2003 that compared the survival of a range of lucerne cultivars under simulated hay-cutting (mown) and commercial grazing regimes. Dry conditions during 2002–03 resulted in a decline in lucerne frequency at about 50% in mown control plots. Grazing increased the stand decline, particularly for many winter-active cultivars where lucerne frequency was reduced by up to 70–93%.

It was concluded that: (i) continuous grazing for prolonged periods can be effective at removing lucerne, but the rate of lucerne loss will be influenced by both stocking rate and rainfall; (ii) the application of herbicides can improve lucerne removal either in association with, or in the absence of grazing; however, herbicide efficacy appeared to be dependent upon the physiological status of the lucerne plants and/or the environmental conditions before application; and (iii) cultivar responses indicated that lucerne types could potentially be developed for phase-farming systems with increased susceptibility to grazing mismanagement.

Additional keywords: phase-farming, pasture termination, Medicago sativa, cultivar differences.


Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the staff at the CSIRO Plant Industry’s Ginninderra Experiment Station, NSW, Agriculture’s Temora Research Station, and to Mr Bernard Whyte of ‘Alroon’ Old Junee for their assistance and provision of experimental sites. The authors thank Ted Wolfe (CSU, Wagga), Bob Gault, Richard Simpson, Ross Downes and John Donnelly (CSIRO Plant Industry) for their guidance, and Bob Forrester for statistical advice (CSIRO Mathematical and Information Services). The authors also acknowledge the technical support of Ollie Owen (NSW Agriculture). Funding for this research was provided by the Grains Research and Development Corporation. (Disclaimer: The herbicide mixtures used in these studies for the removal of established lucerne before cropping were used for research purposes only. They may not be currently registered for this purpose. The authors and the organisations we represent do not endorse the use of these products.)


References


Angus JF, Gault RR, Good AJ, Hart AB, Jones TD, Peoples MB (2000) Lucerne removal before a cropping phase. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 877–890.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Humphries AW, Latta RA, Auricht GC, Bellotti WD (2004) Overcropping lucerne with wheat: effect of lucerne winter activity on total plant production and water use of the mixture, and wheat yield and quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 839–848.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Irwin JAG, Lloyd DL, Lowe KF (2001) Lucerne biology and genetic improvement – an analysis of past activities and future goals in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 699–712.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ Revised 1st edn. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Lodge GM (1985) Effects of grazing and haycutting on the yield and persistence of dryland aphid-resistant lucerne cultivars at Tamworth, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 138–148.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lodge GM (1991) Management practices and other factors contributing to the decline in persistence of grazed lucerne in temperate Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 713–724.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lodge GM, Gleeson AC (1984) A comparison of methods of estimating lucerne population for monitoring persistence. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24, 174–177.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McKinney GT (1974) Management of lucerne for sheep grazing on the Southern Tablelands of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 14, 726–734.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ourry A, Kim TH, Boucaud J (1994) Nitrogen reserve mobilization during regrowth of Medicago sativa L. Plant Physiology 105, 831–837.
PubMed |
open url image1

Peoples MB, Gault RR, Scammell GJ, Dear BS, Virgona J, Sandral GA, Paul J, Wolfe EC, Angus JF (1998) Effect of pasture management on the contributions of fixed N to the N economy of ley-farming systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 459–474. open url image1

Ransom KP, Egan PE (1998) A survey of methods of lucerne removal prior to cropping. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Australian agronomy conference’. (Eds DL Michalk, JE Pratley) pp. 871–872. (Australian Society of Agronomy Inc.: Melbourne)

Smith SR, Bouton JH, Singh A, McCaughey WP (2000) Development and evaluation of grazing-tolerant alfalfa cultivars: a review. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80, 503–512. open url image1

Southwood OR, Robards GE (1975) Lucerne persistence and the productivity of ewes and lambs grazed at two stocking rates within different management systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 747–752.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Swanton CJ, Chandler K, Shrestha A (1998) Control of established alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) in a no-till corn (Zea mays L.) cropping sequence. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78, 175–177. open url image1

Williams RW (1998) Breeding better lucernes for the cropping zone of eastern Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Australian agronomy conference’. (Eds DL Michalk, JE Pratley) pp. 243–246. (Australian Society of Agronomy Inc.: Melbourne)