Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Environmental motivation and monitoring by landholders in north-east Victoria: fact, fantasy and future implications for catchment management

C. L. Reid A C and A. M. Ridley B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A North East Catchment Management Authority, 1B Footmark Court, Wodonga, Vic. 3690, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, RMB 1145, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: chris.reid@necma.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(3) 346-355 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06021
Submitted: 11 January 2006  Accepted: 3 August 2006   Published: 12 February 2007

Abstract

This paper reports on the social and business profiles of 39 landholders (in three groups) in north-east Victoria, participating in an Environmental Management Systems (EMS) project, and their motivations for participating in EMS. The level and type of record keeping, formal monitoring, use of electronic technology, and interest or capacity to monitor their environmental performance were also assessed because this is a crucial part of the EMS process and one that research has not reported on to date. Landholder participation in EMS was mostly for reasons of wanting to better account for sustainability issues in farm management. Most participants recorded rainfall, soil test results, production measures and chemical use (in total 69–97%); however, 31% kept no chemical records. Few kept records of remnant native vegetation, pasture management, weeds, pest animals or native fauna. Electronic record keeping systems were used by 26% of participants. Almost all owned a computer and over 70% used the internet and email. To assess interest and capacity to monitor environmental performance, participants were introduced to a water balance calculation tool (this being a locally relevant issue) and asked to calculate their own values. Most participants needed two to three visits to gain confidence to perform the calculations and most did not view the tools as being of much relevance. This was in strong contrast to previous work carried out in the southern Riverina of New South Wales. We conclude that environmental monitoring is more important for catchment management authorities (CMAs) and state agencies than for landholders. If CMAs are to assess how on-farm actions lead to improved environmental performance, there is a need to collect information remotely, invest in monitoring or provide incentives for farmers. There appears to be insufficient record keeping and monitoring by landholders to trace chemical residue problems. This, in addition to a lack of environmental monitoring, means that farmers in north-east Victoria cannot substantiate either ‘clean’ or ‘green’ claims. Future work should focus on awareness and education in natural resource management, as well as improved record keeping and monitoring. Some form of recognition will be needed if the majority of farmers are to participate in environmental programs. Introductory EMS training provides a means of improving business outcomes, documentation and improving environmental management.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the funding provided by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry for this project. We thank Alastair Campbell for conducting some of the EMS facilitation with the groups.


References


Anon.  (1996) ‘Australian/New Zealand Standard. Environmental management systems – specification with guidance for use.’ (Standards Australia: Homebush, Australia & Standards New Zealand: Wellington, New Zealand)

Anon.  (2004) North East Regional Catchment Strategy. (North East Catchment Management Authority: Wodonga, Vic.). Available at http://necma.vic.gov.au/resources/rcs/ (verified 4 November 2006)

Barr N, Wilkinson R (2005) Social persistence of plant-based management of dryland salinity. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1495–1501.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 4 November 2006)

Cary J, Webb T, Barr N (2002) ‘Understanding landholders’ capacity to change to sustainable practices; insights about practice adoption and social capacity for change.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra)

Gasson R (1973) Goals and values of farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics 24, 521–541. open url image1

Howard KA, Walsh SJ, Lamb KS (2004) BeefCheque: a ‘dirty boots’ approach to achieving profitable beef production in Gippsland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 851–862.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Huhn K-J, Seymour EJ, Ridley AM (2007) Environmental Management Systems in the Australian lamb industry: challenges and opportunities for family farms. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 294–302.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM (2004) The role of applied science to help farmers make decisions about environmental sustainability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 959–968.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM, Pannell DJ (2005) The role of plants and plant-based research and development in managing dryland salinity in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1341–1355.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM, Paramore TR, Beverly CR, Dunin FX, Froelich VMC (2003a) Developing practical monitoring tools from sustainability indicators. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 271–284.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM, Paramore T, Seymour E (2003b) Towards ‘clean and green’ farming systems using group learning to implement Environmental Management Systems. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 637–645.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ridley AM, Seymour EJ, Huhn K-J, Park G (2007) Priority environmental issues for monitoring – mismatch between farmers and catchment management perspectives. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 356–366. doi:10.1071/EA06028 .
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Seymour EJ (2007) Benefits, threats and getting started with Environmental Management Systems: views of primary producers and catchment managers in Victoria, Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 303–311. doi:10.1071/EA06022 .
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Seymour EJ, Ridley AM, Noonan J (2007) Assessing the role of a four-stage approach for improving the compatibility of Environmental Management Systems and Quality Assurance. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 333–345. doi:10.1071/EA06026 .
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stone G (2005) Agribusiness role in extension, education and training: a case study. A report to the Cooperative Venture for Capacity Building. RIRDC Project No. GSA-1A.Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT.

Trapnell LN, Ridley AM, Christy BP, White RE (2006) Sustainable grazing systems: economic and financial implications of adopting different grazing systems in north-east Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 981–992.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 213–222.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1