Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A precise, low-cost milk sampler to enable the analysis of fat, protein, lactose and somatic cells in milk from individual cows

T. Clarke A C , M. C. Hannah A and H. Wientjes B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

B Wageningen University and Research Centre, Costerweg 50, Building 400, Wageningen 6701 BH, The Netherlands.

C Corresponding author. Email: tim.clarke@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(9) 1100-1103 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07152
Submitted: 17 May 2007  Accepted: 31 May 2007   Published: 6 August 2007

Abstract

Less than half of Australian dairy farmers undertake production recording that normally requires the collection of milk samples for the measurements of fat, protein and lactose percentages and somatic cell count. Usually the milk samples are collected from individual animals on a ‘one-day-per-month’ basis by temporary milk-metering or sampling devices. Farmers who do not participate in production recording programs may be encouraged to do so if they could use a simple, robust, inexpensive, convenient and precise sampler. A sampler has been developed to meet these criteria. In this paper we report on the precision and bias of the new sampler with respect to milk composition and somatic cell count by comparison with samples collected by test buckets. For milk fat, the precision was only 3.1% and bias was +0.002% coefficient of variation. Precision for fat yield over a lactation period increases by only 0.02% when compared with results based on samplers that are approved by the International Committee for Animal Recording. We consider that the combination of low sampler cost and low sampler errors makes the new sampler aptly suited for production recording and monitoring somatic cell count.


Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, for use of their facilities and for their financial support.


References


ADHIS (2006) Australian dairy herd improvement scheme. Australian dairy improvement report 2005/2006.

Clarke T, Hannah MC (2007) A simple statistical model to estimate precision of 300-day milk and fat production for dairy cows Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1095–1099.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Clarke T, Andrew S-P, Moate PJ, Pollino CA, Schmidt WL (1997) Evaluation of low cost in-line milk samplers for estimating individual cow somatic cell counts. The Journal of Dairy Research 64, 13–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

ICAR (2007) ICAR recording guidelines. International agreement of recording practices. ICAR guidelines approved by the general assembly held in Kuopio, Finland on 9 June 2006. p. 332–333. Available at http://www.icar.org/Documents/Rules%20and%20regulations/ Guidelines/Guidelines_2007.pdf [Verified 14 June 2007]

McKinnon CH, Cousins CM, Fulford RJ (1973) An in-line sampler for determining the numbers of bacteria derived from teat surfaces and udder infections of cows milked in recorder machines. The Journal of Dairy Research 40, 47–52.
PubMed |
open url image1