Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Feed efficiency for meat and wool production by Merino and F1 Dohne × Merino lambs fed pelleted diets of different nutritive value

D. Van Beem A , D. Wellington A , B. L. Paganoni A B , P. E. Vercoe A and J. T. B. Milton A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: jmilton@animals.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 879-884 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08063
Submitted: 25 January 2008  Accepted: 8 April 2008   Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

There is anecdotal evidence from Western Australian breeders that Dohne sheep maintain a higher level of meat and wool production than Australian Merinos. Feed efficiency, carcass and wool attributes are moderately heritable so we hypothesised there would be differences in these traits between Merino and F1 Dohne × Merino lambs. Two groups of 15 Merino and 15 F1 Dohne × Merino wether lambs (29–40 kg) were fed a pelleted diet of either moderate or high energy and protein content for 48 days. Ad libitum pellet intake and liveweight gain were measured and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) for both wool growth and liveweight were calculated. Wool growth and quality were measured and the lambs were slaughtered to measure carcass and meat quality attributes. The F1 Dohne lambs were heavier at the start of the study and grew faster than the Merinos (P < 0.05) irrespective of diet. Consequently, the carcasses of the F1 Dohne lambs were heavier than the Merinos (P < 0.001), but the differences in FCR were not significant. Merino lambs produced more clean wool of lower fibre diameter from less feed than the F1 Dohne lambs (P < 0.05). These results suggest that F1 Dohne × Merino lambs may have an economic advantage in terms of meat production, but this is traded-off against wool production.


References


Cloete JJE, Hoffman LC, Cloete SWP, Fourie JE (2004a) A comparison between the body composition, carcass characteristics and retail cuts of South African Mutton Merino and Dormer sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 34, 44–51. open url image1

Cloete SWP, Cloete JJE, Herselman MJ, Hoffman LC (2004b) Relative performance and efficiency of five Merino and Merino-type dam lines in a terminal crossbreeding system with Dormer or Suffolk sires. South African Journal of Animal Science 34, 135–143. open url image1

Cloete SWP, Schoeman SJ, Coetzee J, Morris JV (2001) Genetic variances for liveweight and fleece traits in Merino, Dohne Merino and South African meat Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 145–153.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Commack KM, Leymaster KA, Jenkins TG (2005) Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior and daily gain in composite ram lambs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 777–785.
PubMed |
open url image1

Cottle DJ (1991) ‘Australian sheep and wool handbook.’ (Inkata Press: Melbourne)

Dolling CHS, Piper LR (1968) Efficiency of conversion of food to wool. III. Wool production of ewes selected for high clean wool weight and of random control ewes on restricted and unrestricted food intakes in pens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 1009–1028.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fahmy MH, Boucher JM, Poste LM, Gregoire R, Butler G, Comeau JE (1992) Feed efficiency, carcass characteristics, and sensory quality of lambs, with or without prolific ancestry, fed diets with different protein supplements. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1365–1374.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Fogarty NM, Safari E, Taylor PJ, Murray W (2003) Genetic parameters for meat quality and carcass traits and their correlation with wool traits in Australian Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 715–722.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Genstat (2007) ‘Release 10.1 Reference Manual – Part 2: Directives.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Habib G, Siddiqui MM, Mian FH, Jabbar J, Khan F (2001) Effect of protein supplements of varying degradability on growth rate, wool yield and wool quality in grazing lambs. Small Ruminant Research 41, 247–256.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hegarty RS, Shands C, Marchant R, Hopkins DL, Ball AJ, Harden S (2006) Effects of available nutrition and sire breeding values for growth and muscling on the development of crossbred lambs. 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 57, 593–603.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hopkins DL, Hatcher S, Pethick DW, Thornberry KJ (2005) Carcass traits, meat quality and muscle enzyme activity in strains of Merino wether hoggets. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1225–1230.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Kirton AH, Carter AH, Clarke JN, Sinclair DP, Mercer FJK, Duganzich DM (1995) A comparison between 15 ram breeds for export lamb production 1. Liveweights, body composition, carcass measurements and composition. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 271–279. open url image1

Kopke E , Kingwell R , Young J (2005) ‘When you’re on a good thing, do it better: an economic analysis of sheep breed profitability.’ (Department of Agriculture Western Australia: Perth)

Kotze JJJ (1951) The development of a mutton-wooled sheep for the Sour-grassveld area. Farming in South Africa 26, 110. open url image1

Laas TM (1996) Breeding for quality and profit in the Dohne Merino. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 44, 1–9. open url image1

Murray PJ (1996) The effect of nutrition on wool growth, fibre and skin characteristics and liveweight gain of broad and fine wool sheep within two Merino strains. PhD Thesis, The University of Western Australia, Perth.

Nolte JvE, Ferreira AV (2004) Energy and nitrogen retention of Merino and Dohne Merino lambs receiving a feedlot diet. South African Journal of Animal Science 34, 77–79. open url image1

Piper LR, Dolling CHS (1969) Efficiency of conversion of food to wool. V. Comparison of the apparent digestive ability of sheep selected for high clean wool weight with that of sheep from a random control group. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 579–587.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pitchford WD (2004) Genetic improvement of feed efficiency of beef cattle: what lessons can be learnt from other species? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 371–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Robards GE, Davis CH, Saville DG (1976) Skin folds and Merino breeding. 9. Efficiency of conversion of food to wool. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 16, 361–366.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Saville DG, Robards GE (1972) Efficiency of conversion of food to wool in selected and unselected Merino types. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 117–130.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Snowder GD, Van Vleck LD (2003) Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2704–2713.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Turner HN , Young SSY (1969) ‘Quantitative genetics in sheep breeding.’ (Macmillan: Sydney)

Weston RH (1959) The efficiency of wool production of grazing Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 865–885.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams AJ (1966) The efficiency of conversion of feed to wool during limited and unlimited feeding of flocks selected on clean fleece weight. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 6, 90–95.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1