Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ostrich farming and environmental management tools: an overview

G. S. Rodrigues A D , C. C. de A. Buschinelli B and L. R. Muniz C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Embrapa Labex Europe/Unité Propre de Recherche 34, Performance des Systèmes de culture de plantes pérennes, CIRAD-PerSyst, Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

B Embrapa Environment, CxP 069, Jaguariúna, SP, CEP 13820000, Brazil.

C FECOAVESTRUZ-Sudeste/ACAB, Praça Doutor João Mendes 52, Conjunto 502, Sao Paolo, CEP 01501-000, Brazil.

D Corresponding author. Email: stacheti@cnpma.embrapa.br

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(10) 1308-1313 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08143
Submitted: 13 April 2008  Accepted: 3 July 2008   Published: 11 September 2008

Abstract

There is an increasing demand in the ostrich farming sector for management tools that are capable of motivating, preparing and guiding producers to meet the requirements of ‘environmentally conscious’ consumers. Many methodological options are currently available to conduct sustainability assessments and to ensure the best environmental management of rural activities. One option, the ‘System for weighed environmental impact assessment of rural activities’ (APOIA-NovoRural), has recently been validated for ostrich farming, as a tool for checking the contributions of the activity to local sustainable development. Case studies have favoured the understanding of the main environmental impacts and provided valuable recommendations regarding natural resources management and landscape ecology improvements in ostrich farming systems. Most importantly, the criteria and indicators constructed in this environmental management tool may be used for defining general ‘Terms of Reference’ for sustainable ostrich farming.

Additional keywords: struthioculture.


Acknowledgements

The sponsorship and institutional support offered by Embrapa Environment, FECOAVESTRUZ-Sudeste and the ‘Associação de Criadores de Avestruzes do Brasil’ (ACAB) were instrumental for this study. Special gratitude is due to the farmers and administrators Mr. Adair Ribeiro Jr. (Vereda dos Avestruzes, Corumbataí), Mr. Célio Santos (Cooperavestruz, Mogi das Cruzes), Mr. Flávio Henrique de Jesus (GFStruthio, Atibaia), Mr. Marco Antônio Ortega (Sítio Casa Nova, Mairinque), Mr. Marcos Neves (Criavestruz, Pereiras), Mr. Nelson Yutaka Ito (Fazenda Bagres, Mairinque), Mr. Rafael Lucien Tadeu Pereira (Retiro do Avestruz, Itatiba), Mr. Rogério Pascoal Filho and Mrs. Ananda Pascarelli (Terra Brasil Avestruz, Araçatuba), who graciously offered their time and experience.


References


BDOA (2006) So why do we farm ostrich? (British Domesticated Ostrich Association: Carlisle, UK) Available at http://www.ostrich.org.uk/farming/why.html [Verified 22 July 2008]

Bisset R (1987) Methods for environmental impact assessment: a selective survey with case studies. In ‘Environmental impact assessment for developing countries’. (Eds AK Biswas, Q Geping) pp. 3–64. (Tycooly International: London)

Bockstaller C, Girardin P, Van der Werf HMG (1997) Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 7, 261–270.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 22 July 2008]

LSIRD (1999) Opportunities for species diversification for farm and environmental management: three European feasibility studies. (Macaulay Land Use Research Institute: Craigiebuckler, UK) Available at http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/livestocksystems/feasibility/introfeas.pdf [Verified 22 July 2008]

Monteiro RC, Rodrigues GS (2006) A system of integrated indicators for socio-environmental assessment and eco-certification in agriculture – Ambitec-Agro. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 1, 47–59. open url image1

Neher D (1992) Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems: definition and measurement. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2, 51–61.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nuñez Y, Fermoso J, Garcia N, Irusta R (2005) Comparative life cycle assessment of beef, pork and ostrich meat: a critical point of view. International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology 4, 140–151.
Crossref |
open url image1

Rodrigues GS, Campanhola C (2003) Sistema integrado de avaliação de impacto ambiental aplicado a atividades do Novo Rural. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 38, 445–451. open url image1

Rodrigues GS, Moreira-Viñas A (2007) An environmental impact assessment system for responsible rural production in Uruguay. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 2, 42–54. open url image1

Rodrigues GS, Campanhola C, Rodrigues IA, Frighetto RTS, Ramos Filho LO (2006) Gestão ambiental de atividades rurais: estudo de caso em agroturismo e agricultura orgânica. Agricultura em São Paulo 53, 17–31. open url image1

Rodrigues GS, Buschinelli CCA, Rodrigues IA, Medeiros CB (2007) A collaborative research initiative for the environmental management of struthioculture. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Sciences 9, 221–228. open url image1

Rossi R, Nota D (2000) Nature and landscape production potentials of organic types of agriculture: a check of evaluation criteria and parameters in two Tuscan farm-landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 77, 53–64.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shanawany MM (1995) Recent developments in ostrich farming. World Animal Review 83, 3–8. open url image1

Smith CS, McDonald GT (1998) Assessing the sustainability of agriculture at the planning stage. Journal of Environmental Management 52, 15–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

van der Meer HG (2008) Optimising manure management for GHG outcomes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 38–45.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

van Groenigen JW, Schils RLM, Velthof GL, Kuikman PJ, Oudendag DA, Oenema O (2008) Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from animal production systems: synergy between measuring and modeling at different scales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 46–53.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1









1 The APOIA-NovoRural System spreadsheets can be made available by a request to the authors.