Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Improved interpretation of labelled fish otoliths: a cost-effective tool in sustainable fisheries management

T. Niva A B , P. Keränen A , J. Raitaniemi A and H. M. Berger A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Tutkijantie 2A, 90550 Oulu, Finland.

B Corresponding author. Email: teuvo.niva@rktl.fi

Marine and Freshwater Research 56(5) 705-711 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04143
Submitted: 12 July 2004  Accepted: 7 March 2005   Published: 24 July 2005

Abstract

A total of 222 pairs of alizarin red S (ARS)-labelled and 75 pairs of unlabelled sagittal otoliths from six hatchery-reared species, including Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)), lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum)), salmon (Salmo salar L.), brown trout (Salmo trutta L.), whitefish (Coregonus sp.) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)), were used in blind tests to determine whether sawing a 0.4-mm thick slice from the otolith would improve the interpretation of labelled otoliths. The fish were labelled in 1995–2002. Fish age at labelling varied from two weeks to three months, immersion time from three to six hours and concentration of ARS 50–100 ppm. Blind tests were arranged so that sawed slices were contrasted with entire otoliths using stereomicroscope under UV epi-illumination. According to blind tests, the accuracy of interpretation of ARS-labelled otoliths was 97.0% from the slices and 92.3% from entire otoliths. The role of different filters in detecting false marks owing to autofluorescence is discussed. Cost-benefits of the method are discussed briefly.

Extra keywords: alizarin red S, fluorochrome marker, sagittal otolith, stereofluorescence microscopy.


Acknowledgments

We thank Kimmo Kahilainen, Kari Nyberg, Randi Saksgård and Sami Vesala for offering their time to blind tests. The present study was founded by The Nordic Council of Ministers.


References

Bedford, B. C. (1983). A method for preparing sections of large numbers of otoliths embedded in black polyester resin. Journal du Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 41, 4–12.
Fielder D. G. (2002). Methodology for immersion marking walleye fry and fingerlings in oxytetracycline hydrochloride and its detection with fluorescence microscopy. Fisheries Technical Report 2002–1. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division. Available at http://www.michigandnr.com/publications/pdfs/ifr/ifrlibra/technical/ reports/2002-1tr.pdf, verified June 2005.

Fleming, I. A. , Hindar, K. , Mjølnerød, I. B. , Jonsson, B. , Balstad, T. , and Lamberg, A. (2000). Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 267, 1517–1523.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Folkvord A., Wright P. J., and Mosegaard H. (1998). Marking otoliths. In ‘Otolith Preparation and Analysis. Proceedings of a Workshop held at the University of Bergen, Norway, 18–20 June 1998’. (Ed. P. J. Wright.) pp. 4–9. EFAN Report 2–98. Available at http://www2.efan.no/News/report1.htm, verified June 2005.

Hindar, K. , Ryman, N. , and Utter, F. (1991). Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 945–957.
Makkonen J., and Pursiainen M. (1997). Nieriän ruskuaispussipoikasten merkintä alitsariinipunainen S – väriaineella (Marking yolk sac larvae of Arctic charr with alizarin red S). In ‘Saimaan Nieriä, Syvien Vesien Uhanalainen. Kalatutkimuksia 133’. (Ed. J. Makkonen.) pp. 115–129. (Riista- ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos: Helsinki.) [In Finnish]

Nagata, M. , and Irvine, J. M. (1997). Differential dispersal patterns of male and female masu salmon fry. Journal of Fish Biology 51, 601–606.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Thomas L. M., Holt S. A., and Arnold C. R. (1995). Chemical marking techniques for larval and juvenile red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) otoliths using different fluorescent markers. In ‘Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research’. (Eds D. H. Secor, J. M. Dean and S. E. Campana.) pp. 703–717. (University of South Carolina Press: Columbia, SC.)

Thorrold, S. R. , Jones, G. P. , Hellberg, M. E. , Burton, R. S. , Swearer, S. E. , Neigel, J. E. , Morgan, S. G. , and Warner, R. R. (2002). Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers. Bulletin of Marine Science 70((Suppl.)), 291–308.


Volk, E. C. , Schroder, S. L. , and Grimm, J. J. (1999). Otolith thermal marking. Fisheries Research 43, 205–219.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waples, R. S. (1991). Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 124–133.