Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Impacts of VIE tagging and Rhodamine B immersion staining on two measures of performance for a small-bodied fish

P. A. Franklin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-7259 A * , R. Crawford A B , W. B. van Ravenhorst C D and C. F. Baker https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-4242 A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.

B University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

C HAS University of Applied Sciences, Den Bosch, Netherlands.

D Present address: Rijnland Regional Water Authority, Leiden, Netherlands.

* Correspondence to: paul.franklin@niwa.co.nz

Handling Editor: Michael Joy

Marine and Freshwater Research 75, MF23187 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF23187
Submitted: 23 September 2023  Accepted: 19 December 2023  Published: 17 January 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context

Passage efficiency is an important metric for quantifying the success of fish-passage remediation. Mark–recapture methods are typically employed to estimate fish-passage efficiency. Although biotelemetry methods have become a benchmark standard for such studies, they remain unfeasible for many small-bodies species because of the excessive size of electronic tags.

Aims

This study compares two commonly deployed marking methods that are potentially suitable for estimating passage efficiency for small-bodied species, namely, visible implant elastomer (VIE) tagging and batch immersion staining with Rhodamine B.

Methods

The critical swimming speeds and passage efficiency at a remediated culvert of Galaxias maculatus were compared for VIE-tagged, Rhodamine B-stained and control treatments.

Key results

Both critical swimming speeds and passage efficiency at the culvert were significantly lower in VIE-tagged Galaxias maculatus than in both control fish and fish stained with Rhodamine B.

Conclusions

Rhodamine B may be a suitable batch immersion stain for short-term (<4 day), non-destructive mark–recapture studies in small-bodied fishes, but VIE-tagging methods may result in underestimation of passage efficiency.

Implications

It is important to evaluate the impact of marking techniques on the outcomes of mark–recapture studies to ensure that estimates of passage efficiency are accurate.

Keywords: fish migration, fish passage, Galaxias maculatus, immersion staining, mark–recapture, passage efficiency, Rhodamine B, visible implant elastomer.

References

Afentoulis V, Kalmbach A, Hung TC, Rahman MM, Ellison L, Miranda J (2022) Vital dye immersion evaluations with juvenile delta smelt. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries 3, 102-111.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Astorga N, Afonso JM, Zamorano MJ, Montero D, Oliva V, Fernandez H, Izquierdo MS (2005) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer tags for tagging juvenile gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.); effects on growth, mortality, handling time and tag loss. Aquaculture Research 36, 733-738.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Baker CF (2003) Effect of fall height and notch shape on the passage of inanga (Galaxias maculatus) and common bullies (Gobiomorphus cotidianus) over an experimental weir. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37, 283-290.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Baker CF, Reeve K, Baars D, Jellyman D, Franklin P (2017) Efficacy of 12-mm half-duplex passive integrated transponder tags in monitoring fish movements through stationary antenna systems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 37, 1289-1298.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bolland JD, Cowx IG, Lucas MC (2009) Evaluation of VIE and PIT tagging methods for juvenile cyprinid fishes. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25, 381-386.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Brett JR (1964) The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21, 1183-1226.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bunt CM, Castro-Santos T, Haro A (2012) Performance of fish passage structures at upstream barriers to migration. River Research and Applications 28, 457-478.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cooke SJ, Midwood JD, Thiem JD, Klimley P, Lucas MC, Thorstad EB, Eiler J, Holbrook C, Ebner BC (2013) Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future. Animal Biotelemetry 1, 5.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Crawford R, Gee E, Dupont D, Hicks B, Franklin P (2023) No difference between critical and sprint swimming speeds for two galaxiid species. Journal of Fish Biology 102, 1141-1148.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Franklin PA, Bartels B (2012) Restoring connectivity for migratory native fish in a New Zealand stream: effectiveness of retrofitting a pipe culvert. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 22, 489-497.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Franklin P, Gee E (2019) Living in an amphidromous world: perspectives on the management of fish passage from an island nation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 29, 1424-1437.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Furtbauer I, King AJ, Heistermann M (2015) Visible implant elastomer (VIE) tagging and simulated predation risk elicit similar physiological stress responses in three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Journal of Fish Biology 86, 1644-1649.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Gaillard M, Parlanti E, Sourzac M, Couillaud F, Genevois C, Boutry S, Rigaud C, Daverat F (2022) New insights into detecting alizarin from autofluorescence in marked glass eels. Scientific Reports 12, 15985.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Hershey H (2021) Updating the consensus on fishway efficiency: a meta-analysis. Fish and Fisheries 22, 735-748.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Holland KN, Iverson SJ, Kocik JF, Mills Flemming JE, Whoriskey FG (2015) Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Imbert H, Beaulaton L, Rigaud C, Elie P (2007) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer as a method for tagging small European eels. Journal of Fish Biology 71, 1546-1554.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jones PE, Svendsen JC, Börger L, Champneys T, Consuegra S, Jones JAH, Garcia de Leaniz C (2020) One size does not fit all: inter- and intraspecific variation in the swimming performance of contrasting freshwater fish. Conservation Physiology 8, coaa126.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jones PE, Champneys T, Vevers J, Börger L, Svendsen JC, Consuegra S, Jones J, Garcia de Leaniz C (2021) Selective effects of small barriers on river-resident fish. Journal of Applied Ecology 58, 1487-1498.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Jungwirth A, Balzarini V, Zöttl M, Salzmann A, Taborsky M, Frommen JG (2019) Long-term individual marking of small freshwater fish: the utility of visual implant elastomer tags. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73, 49.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kullmann B, Hempel M, Thiel R (2018) Chemical marking of European glass eels Anguilla anguilla with alizarin red S and in combination with strontium: in situ evaluation of short-term salinity effects on survival and efficient mass-marking. Journal of Fish Biology 92, 203-213.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Lennox RJ, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Deng ZD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Heupel M, Hinch SG, Holland KN, Hussey NE, Iverson SJ, Kessel ST, Kocik JF, Lucas MC, Flemming JM, Nguyen VM, Stokesbury MJW, Vagle S, VanderZwaag DL, Whoriskey FG, Young N (2017) Envisioning the future of aquatic animal tracking: technology, science, and application. BioScience 67, 884-896.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lü HJ, Fu M, Xi D, Yao WZ, Su SQ, Wu ZL (2015) Experimental evaluation of using calcein and alizarin red S for immersion marking of bighead carp Aristichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) to assess growth and identification of marks in otoliths, scales and fin rays. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 31, 665-674.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Marsden T, Stuart I (2019) Fish passage developments for small-bodied tropical fish: field case-studies lead to technology improvements. Journal of Ecohydraulics 4, 14-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McCleave JD (1980) Swimming performance of European eel (Anguilla anguilla (L.)) elvers. Journal of Fish Biology 16, 445-452.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Moore DM, Brewer SK (2021) Evaluation of visual implant elastomer, PIT, and p-chip tagging methods in a small-bodied minnow species. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 41, 1066-1078.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Noonan MJ, Grant JWA, Jackson CD (2012) A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish and Fisheries 13, 450-464.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

O’Grady JJ, Hoy JB (1972) Rhodamine B and other stains as markers for the mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis. Journal of Medical Entomology 9, 571-574.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Rolls RJ, Ellison T, Faggotter S, Roberts DT (2013) Consequences of connectivity alteration on riverine fish assemblages: potential opportunities to overcome constraints in applying conventional monitoring designs. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 23, 624-640.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rolls RJ, Faggotter SJ, Roberts DT, Burford MA (2018) Simultaneous assessment of two passage facilities for maintaining hydrological connectivity for subtropical coastal riverine fish. Ecological Engineering 124, 77-87.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sandford M, Castillo G, Hung TC (2019) A review of fish identification methods applied on small fish. Reviews in Aquaculture 12, 542-554.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Silva AT, Lucas MC, Castro-Santos T, Katopodis C, Baumgartner LJ, Thiem JD, Aarestrup K, Pompeu PS, O’Brien GC, Braun DC, Burnett NJ, Zhu DZ, Fjeldstad H-P, Forseth T, Rajaratnam N, Williams JG, Cooke SJ (2018) The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice. Fish and Fisheries 19, 340-362.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thieme M, Birnie-Gauvin K, Opperman JJ, Franklin PA, Richter H, Baumgartner L, Ning N, Vu AV, Brink K, Sakala M, O’Brien GC, Petersen R, Tongchai P, Cooke SJ (2023) Measures to safeguard and restore river connectivity. Environmental Reviews [Published online early 23 August 2023].
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tummers JS, Hudson S, Lucas MC (2016) Evaluating the effectiveness of restoring longitudinal connectivity for stream fish communities: towards a more holistic approach. Science of the Total Environment 569, 850-860.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Vezza P, Libardoni F, Manes C, Tsuzaki T, Bertoldi W, Kemp PS (2020) Rethinking swimming performance tests for bottom-dwelling fish: the case of European glass eel (Anguilla anguilla). Scientific Reports 10, 16416.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Watson JR, Goodrich HR, Cramp RL, Gordos MA, Franklin CE (2019) Assessment of the effects of microPIT tags on the swimming performance of small-bodied and juvenile fish. Fisheries Research 218, 22-28.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wilkes MA, Webb JA, Pompeu PS, Silva LGM, Vowles AS, Baker CF, Franklin P, Link O, Habit E, Kemp PS (2018) Not just a migration problem: metapopulations, habitat shifts, and gene flow are also important for fishway science and management. River Research and Applications 35, 1688-1696.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |