Role of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme in Enhanced Primary Care: allied health or allied outlier?Raymond Lam A , Estie Kruger A B and Marc Tennant A
A Centre for Rural and Remote Oral Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Australian Journal of Primary Health 19(3) 228-235 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY12073
Submitted: 4 April 2012 Accepted: 26 June 2012 Published: 28 August 2012
This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme (CDSS) and the Allied Health Profession (AHP) program as they related to the greater Enhanced Primary Care Scheme introduced by the Australian Government to manage patients with chronic and complex diseases. A retrospective analysis of data pertaining to Medicare items related to dentistry and the allied health professions were extracted from the Medicare Benefits Schedule database online, and formed the basis of this study. The highest proportion of services was provided in the state of New South Wales. There appears to be synergy in the utilisation of services with jurisdictions either overutilising or underutilising services. Costs to the Enhanced Primary Care Scheme under the CDSS model (fee for service) were up to 40 times more expensive compared with the AHP model (fee per visit). Costs and treatment associated with the CDSS experienced an increase of 13 350% during the period 2007–08, coincident with an increase in subsidisation. Reconstructive dentistry accounted for the majority of the increase. Gender disparities in dentistry were less distinct when compared with AHPs and were postulated to be due to males presenting with conditions that were more progressive requiring more invasive treatment. A comparative analysis indicates significant differences in costs, nature of treatment and the manner of remuneration between dentistry and the AHPs. A fee for service schedule as evidenced by the CDSS is dependent on the degree of financial incentive as indicated by patterns in utilisation over time. The amount of treatment considered necessary may be influenced by the level of subsidy with treatment that may not reflect disease management. The AHP model, which is based around a fee for visit schedule, is not without its deficiencies but has not experienced significant rises in cost compared with the CDSS.
Additional keywords: dentistry, public health.
ReferencesAllied Health Professions Australia (2010) Background papers - August 2010. Available at http://www.ahpa.com.au [Verified 9 March 2012]
Austlii (2010) Australian Constitution Section 51 xxiiiA. Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430 [Verified 12 April 2012]
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) ‘Australian Demographic Statistics Sept. 2008 (3101.0).’ (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra)
Australian Dental Association (2009) ‘The Australian Schedule of Dental Services and Glossary.’ 9th edn. (Australian Dental Association: Sydney)
Australian Health Minister’s Advisory Council (2004) ‘National Advisory Committee on Oral Health Healthy Mouths Healthy Lives: Australia’s national oral health plan 2004–2013. Australia’s Health Ministers Conference.’ (South Australian Department of Health: Adelaide)
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2001) Oral health and access to dental care 1994–96. AIHW Dental Statistics and Research Unit paper. Canberra.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2006) Chronic disease and associated risk factors in Australia. AIHW cat no. PHE 81. Canberra.
Biggs A (2009) Overview of Commonwealth involvement in funding dental care. Research paper no.1 2008–2009. Parliament of Australia, Canberra.
Brocklehurst P, Tickle M, Birch S, Glenny AM, Mertz E, Grytten J (2012) The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behavior of primary care dentists protocol. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD009853
Department of Health WA (2011) ‘WA Chronic Health Conditions Framework 2011–2016.’ Department of Health, Perth.
Department of Health and Ageing (2009a) Primary health care reform in Australia. Report to support Australia’s First National Health Care Strategy. Available at http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.ns/content/nphc-draftreportsupp-toc/$file/NPHC-supp.pdf [Verified 11 March 2012]
Department of Health and Ageing (2009b) MBS statistics. Available at http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/provider/medicare/mbs.jsp#N1003F [Verified 15 January 2011]
Department of Health and Ageing (2009c) Medicare Benefits Schedule Category 8. Available at http://www.health.gov.au/mbsonline [Verified 8 January 2012]
Dowrick C (2006) The chronic disease strategy for Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia 185, 61–62.
Haines TP, Foster MM, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Tweedy S, Hart A, Mitchell G (2010) Impact of Enhanced Primary Care on equitable access to and economic efficiency of allied health services: a qualitative investigation. Australian Health Review 34, 30–35.
| Impact of Enhanced Primary Care on equitable access to and economic efficiency of allied health services: a qualitative investigation.CrossRef |
Marshall J (1976) Moral hazard. The American Economic Review 66, 880–890.
Mitchell GK, Tieman JJ, Shelby-James TM (2008) Multidisciplinary care planning and teamwork in primary care. The Medical Journal of Australia 188, 61–64.
National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (2009) A healthier future for all Australians: final report. NHHRC, Canberra.
Tickle M, McDonald R, Aggarwal VR, Milsom K, Reeves D (2011) Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behavior changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992–2009. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 39, 465–473.
| Paying for the wrong kind of performance? Financial incentives and behavior changes in National Health Service dentistry 1992–2009.CrossRef |
Wright D, Batchelor P (2001) General dental practitioners’ beliefs on the perceived benefits of and their preferences for remuneration mechanisms. British Dental Journal 192, 46–49.