Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A comparison of thermocouples and temperature paints to monitor spatial and temporal characteristics of landscape-scale prescribed fires*

Louis R. Iverson A B , Daniel A. Yaussy A , Joanne Rebbeck A , Todd F. Hutchinson A , Robert P. Long A and Anantha M. Prasad A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Northeastern Research Station, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 359 Main Road, Delaware, OH 43015, USA.

B Corresponding author. Telephone: +1 740 368-0097; fax: +1 740 368-0152; email: liverson@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 13(3) 311-322 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03063
Submitted: 9 September 2003  Accepted: 2 March 2004   Published: 16 November 2004

Abstract

A method to better monitor landscape-level fire characteristics is presented. Three study areas in southern Ohio oak-hickory (Quercus-Carya) forests were established with four treatment areas of ~20 ha each: control (C), burn only (B), thin only (T) or thin plus burn (TB). Two independent measures useful for qualitatively characterising fire intensity were established on a 50-m grid, resulting in over 120 sampling locations at each site, in the burned areas: aluminum tags painted with temperature-sensitive paints, and logger-probe units that logged probe temperature every 2 s during burns. Fires were conducted in spring 2001. The logger-probe units allowed five measures qualitatively related to fire intensity or timing to be calculated at each grid point: maximum probe temperature; duration of probe temperature above 30°C; a heat index, defined as the summed temperatures above 30°C; time of maximum temperature; and estimated rate of spread. Maximum temperatures recorded by the two measuring systems were highly correlated (r2 = 0.83). Relative to painted tags, logger-probe units provide information useful for assessing some other components of fire behaviour. The temporal recording of temperatures allowed us to prepare a web-based simulation of the fires. Heat index and rate of spread estimates provided additional fire information. The TB units consistently burned cooler than the B units, perhaps because of uncured slash and a disrupted fuel bed in those units.

Additional keywords: animation of fire; fire intensity; oak forests; oak regeneration; Ohio.


References


Abrahamson WG , Abrahamson JR (1996) Effects of a low-intensity winter fire on long-unburned Florida sand pine scrub. Natural Areas Journal  16, 171–183.
National Interagency Fire Center (2001) ‘Review and update of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy.’ http://www.nifc.gov/fire_policy/docs. (National Interagency Fire Center: Boise, ID)

Nelson RM (2000) Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  30, 1071–1087.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sutherland EK (1997) History of fire in a southern Ohio second-growth mixed-oak forest. In 'Proceedings 11th central hardwood forest conference'. (Eds SG Pallardy, RA Cecich, HE Garrett, PS Johnson) pp. 172–183. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NC-188. (St Paul, MN)

Taylor AH , Skinner CN (1998) Fire history and landscape dynamics in a late-successional reserve, Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management  111, 285–301.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Wagner CE , Methven IR (1978) Discussion: two recent articles on fire ecology. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  8, 491–492.


Walker JD , Stocks BJ (1968) Thermocouple errors in forest fire research. Fire Technology  4, 59–62.


Whelan RJ (1995) ‘The ecology of fire.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)  

Yaussy DA ,  Sutherland EK (1993) Fire history in the Ohio River Valley and its relation to climate. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th international conference of fire and fire and forest meteorology’.  pp. 777–786. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)




* This manuscript was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time and therefore is in the public domain and not subject to copyright.