International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The importance of fire–atmosphere coupling and boundary-layer turbulence to wildfire spread

Ruiyu Sun A D , Steven K. Krueger A , Mary Ann Jenkins B , Michael A. Zulauf A and Joseph J. Charney C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0110, USA.

B Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Faculty of Pure and Applied Science, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.

C United States Forest Service, North Central Research Station, East Landsing, MI, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: ruiyu.sun@noaa.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(1) 50-60 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07072
Submitted: 18 May 2007  Accepted: 26 March 2008   Published: 17 February 2009

Abstract

The major source of uncertainty in wildfire behavior prediction is the transient behavior of wildfire due to changes in flow in the fire’s environment. The changes in flow are dominated by two factors. The first is the interaction or ‘coupling’ between the fire and the fire-induced flow. The second is the interaction or ‘coupling’ between the fire and the ambient flow driven by turbulence due to wind gustiness and eddies in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). In the present study, coupled wildfire–atmosphere large-eddy simulations of grassland fires are used to examine the differences in the rate of spread and area burnt by grass fires in two types of ABL, a buoyancy-dominated ABL and a roll-dominated ABL. The simulations show how a buoyancy-dominated ABL affects fire spread, how a roll-dominated ABL affects fire spread, and how fire lines interact with these two different ABL flow types. The simulations also show how important are fire–atmosphere couplings or fire-induced circulations to fire line spread compared with the direct impact of the turbulence in the two different ABLs. The results have implications for operational wildfire behavior prediction. Ultimately, it will be important to use techniques that include an estimate of uncertainty in wildfire behavior forecasts.

Additional keywords: atmospheric boundary layer, coupled atmosphere–wildfire numerical model, fire-induced convection, grassland fire, probabilistic wildfire prediction, rate of fire spread.


Acknowledgements

The present research was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Joint Venture Agreement 03-JV-11231300 08. A gratis grant of computer time from the Center for High Performance Computing, University of Utah, is gratefully acknowledged. We thank three anonymous reviewers for suggestions on how to improve a previous version of the paper. The first author would like to thank Dr Chin-Hoh Moeng, Dr Peter Sullivan, Dr Margaret LeMone, and Dr Tammy Weckworth for their useful discussions about the simulation results.


References


Albini FA (1982) Response of free-burning fires to non-steady wind. Combustion Science and Technology  29, 225–241.
CrossRef |

Albini FA (1983) The variability of wind-aided free-burning fires. Combustion Science and Technology  31, 303–311.
CrossRef |

Anderson HE, Rothermel RC (1965) Influence of moisture and wind upon the characteristics of free-burning fires. In ‘Tenth Symposium (International) Combustion. Proceedings’. pp. 1009–1019. (Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)

Anderson DH, Catchpole EA, de Mestre NJ , Parkes T (1982) Modelling the spread of grass fires. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society Series B – Applied Mathematics  23, 451–466.


Beer T (1991) The interaction of wind and fire. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  54, 287–308.
CrossRef |

Butler BW, Forthofer JM, Stratton RD, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS (2005) Fire growth simulations of the Price canyon, Thirtymile and Storm King Mountain fires using high-resolution wind simulation tools and FARSITE. In ‘Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Sixth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology and the 19th InteriorWest Fire Council Meeting’, 25–27 October 2005, Canmore, AB, Canada. (CD-ROM) (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)

Cheney NP , Gould JS (1995) Fire growth in grassland fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire  5(4), 237–247.
CrossRef |

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1993) The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire  3(1), 31–44.
CrossRef |

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grassland. International Journal of Wildland Fire  8(1), 1–13.
CrossRef |

Clark TL, Jenkins MA, Coen J , Packham D (1996) A coupled atmosphere–fire model: role of the convective Froude number and dynamic fingering at the fireline. International Journal of Wildland Fire  6, 177–190.
CrossRef |

Clark TL, Coen J , Latham D (2004) Description of a coupled atmosphere–fire model. International Journal of Wildland Fire  13, 49–63.
CrossRef |

Coen JL (2005) Simulation of the Big Elk Fire using coupled atmosphere–fire modeling. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14(1), 49–59.
CrossRef |

Crosby J , Chandler CC (1966) Get the most from your windspeed observation. Fire Management Today  27(4), 12–13.


Deardorff JW (1972) Numerical investigation of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences  29, 91–115.
CrossRef |

Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorology  18, 495–527.
CrossRef |

Droegemeier KK , Wilhelmson RB (1987) Numerical simulation of thunderstorm outflow dynamics. Part I: Outflow sensitivity experiments and turbulence dynamics. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences  44, 1180–1210.
CrossRef |

Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model, development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)

Fons WL (1946) Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels. Journal of Agricultural Research  72(3), 93–121.


Forestry Canadian Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behavior prediction system. Canadian Forest Service, Information Report STX-3. (Ottawa, ON)

Hirsch KH (1996) Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System: user’s guide. Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Center, Special Report 7. (Edmonton, AB)

Jenkins MA (2002) An examination of the sensitivity of numerically simulated wildfires to low-level atmospheric stability and moisture, and the consequences for the Haines Index. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11(4), 213–232.
CrossRef |

McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grass fire behaviour. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 100. (Canberra)

Mell W, Jenkins MA, Gould J , Cheney P (2007) A physically based approach to modelling grassland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire  16, 1–22.
CrossRef |

Moeng C-H , Sullivan PP (1994) A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences  51, 999–1022.
CrossRef |

Morvan D, Tauleigne V, Dupuy JL (2002) Wind effects on wildfire propagation through a Mediterranean shrub. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety: Proceedings of IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research/2002 Wildland Fire Safety Summit’, 18–23 November 2002, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Millpress: Rotterdam)

Pitts WM (1991) Wind effects on fires. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science  17, 83–134.
CrossRef |

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research paper INT 115. (Ogden, UT)

Stevens DE , Bretherton CS (1996) A forward-in-time advection scheme and adaptive multilevel flow solver for nearly incompressible atmospheric flow. Journal of Computational Physics  129, 284–295.
CrossRef |

Stocks BJ, Alexander ME, Wotton BM, Stefner CN, Flannigan MD , Taylor SW (2004) Crown fire behavior in a northern jack pine–black spruce forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  34, 1548–1560.
CrossRef |

Stull RB (1988) ‘An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)

Sun R, Jenkins MA, Krueger SK , Charney J (2006) An evaluation of fire plume properties simulated with the FDS and Clark coupled wildfire model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  36, 2894–2908.
CrossRef |

Taylor SW, Wotton BM, Alexander ME , Dalrymple GN (2004) Variation in wind and crown fire behavior in a northern jack pine–black spruce forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  34, 1561–1576.
CrossRef |

Wicker LJ , Skamarock WC (1998) A time-splitting scheme for the elastic equations incorporating second-order Runge–Kutta time differencing. Monthly Weather Review  126, 1992–1999.
CrossRef |

Zalesak ST (1979) Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithm for fluids. Journal of Computational Physics  31, 335–362.
CrossRef |

Zulauf MA (2001) Modeling the effects of boundary layer circulations generated by cumulus convection and leads on large-scale surface fluxes. PhD dissertation, University of Utah.



Export Citation Cited By (26)