Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Laboratory benchmark of low-cost portable gas and particle analysers at the source of smouldering wildfires

Wuquan Cui https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2133-1709 A , Simona Dossi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-5934 A and Guillermo Rein https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7207-2685 A *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Mechanical Engineering and Leverhulme Centre for Wildfire, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

* Correspondence to: g.rein@imperial.ac.uk

International Journal of Wildland Fire 32(11) 1542-1557 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22150
Submitted: 8 July 2022  Accepted: 17 October 2023  Published: 21 November 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Background

Smouldering wildfires emit large amounts of carbon, toxic gases and particulate matter (PM), posing health and environmental hazards. It is challenging to conduct field measurements on wildfire emissions, and available instruments are limited by high cost and low mobility.

Aim

Here, we contribute to solving this challenge by studying three commercial low-cost and portable air quality analysers (KANE101, SDS011 and FLOW) and comparing them with research-grade instruments (FTIR, PM Cascade Impactor and DustTrak).

Methods

A series of laboratory experiments on peat smouldering were conducted including the stages of ignition, spread and burnout to provide conditions of emission measurements near the source.

Key results

The gas analyser KANE101 accurately measured CO2 and allowed calculation of modified combustion efficiency (MCE). The FLOW air pollution sensor was found unsuitable for PM measurements near fire sources because of its narrow range. FLOW captured the variation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), but measurements did not correlate well with NO2 measurements. The SDS011 PM sensor responded well in measuring PM10 in this study.

Conclusions

KANE101 and SDS011 can be used in the field after calibration to measure CO2/CO and PM.

Implications

This work provides a better understanding of how low-cost and portable emission sensors can be of use for wildfire measurements in the field.

Keywords: air quality, analysers, health, particulate matter, peat fire emissions, peatland, pollution, smouldering, toxic gases, wildfire.