Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterising resource use and potential inefficiencies during large-fire suppression in the western US

Hari Katuwal A D , Christopher J. Dunn B and David E. Calkin C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, 1901 Fourth Avenue, Stevens Point, WI 54481, USA.

B Oregon State University, 280 Peavy Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

C Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 800 E Beckwith, Missoula, MT 59801, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: hkatuwal@uwsp.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(7) 604-614 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17054
Submitted: 15 July 2016  Accepted: 16 June 2017   Published: 10 July 2017

Abstract

Currently, limited research on large-fire suppression effectiveness suggests fire managers may over-allocate resources relative to values to be protected. Coupled with observations that weather may be more important than resource abundance to achieve control objectives, resource use may be driven more by risk aversion than efficiency. To explore this potential, we investigated observed percentage of perimeter contained and self-reported containment values, the exposure index, and patterns of resource use during the containment and control phases of fire response. Fireline production capacity of responding resources typically exceeds final fire perimeter, often by an order of magnitude or more. Additionally, on average, 21% of total incident resource productive capacity was observed on the fire during the control phase, that is, after the fires cease to grow. Our results suggest self-reported percentage containment significantly underestimates actual percentage of perimeter contained throughout an incident, with reported values averaging only 70% contained at actual fire cessation. Combined, these results suggest a fire manager’s risk perception influences resource use and may unnecessarily expose responders to fireline hazards. These results suggest a considerable opportunity to improve large-fire management efficiency by balancing the likelihood and consequences of fire escape against the opportunity cost of resource use.

Additional keywords: firefighting, large fire management, percentage contained, suppression resource effectiveness.


References

Bell DE (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research 30, 961–981.
Regret in decision making under uncertainty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Broyles G (2011) Fireline production rate. USDA Forest Service, National Technology & Development Program, Fire Management Report 1151–1805. (San Dimas, CA, USA)

Butler C, O’Connor M, Lincoln J (2015) Aviation-related wildland firefighter fatalities – United States, 2000–2013. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64, 793–796.
Aviation-related wildland firefighter fatalities – United States, 2000–2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest Service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970–2002. Journal of Forestry 103, 179–183.

Calkin DE, Ager AA, Gilbertson-Day J (2010) Wildfire risk and hazard: procedures for the first approximation. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-235. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Calkin D, Phipps J, Holmes T, Rieck J, Thompson M (2011) The exposure index: developing firefighter safety performance measures. Fire Management Today 71, 24–27.

Calkin DE, Venn T, Wibbenmeyer M, Thompson MP (2013) Estimating US federal wildland fire managers’ preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 212–222.
Estimating US federal wildland fire managers’ preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calkin DE, Stonesifer CS, Thompson MP, McHugh CW (2014) Large airtanker use and outcomes in suppressing wildland fires in the United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 259–271.
Large airtanker use and outcomes in suppressing wildland fires in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Canton-Thompson J, Gebert KM, Thompson B, Jones G, Calkin D, Donovan G (2008) External human factors in incident management team decisionmaking and their effect on large fire suppression expenditures. Journal of Forestry 106, 416–424.

Donovan GH, Brown TC (2005) An alternative incentive structure for wildfire management on national forest land. Forest Science 51, 387–395.

Duff TJ, Tolhurst KG (2015) Operational wildfire suppression modelling: a review evaluating development, state of the art and future directions. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 735–748.
Operational wildfire suppression modelling: a review evaluating development, state of the art and future directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finney M, Grenfell IC, McHugh CW (2009) Modeling containment of large wildfires using generalized linear mixed-model analysis. Forest Science 55, 249–255.

Fire Executive Council (2009) Guidance for implementation of federal wildland fire management policy. Available at http://www.nifc.gov/policies/guidance/GIFWFMP.pdf [Verified 28 June 2016]

Gebert KM, Calkin DE, Yoder J (2007) Estimating suppression expenditures for individual large wildland fires. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 22, 188–196.

Haas JR, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2013) A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into Wildland Urban Interface risk assessments within the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 119, 44–53.
A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into Wildland Urban Interface risk assessments within the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hand MS, Wibbenmeyer MJ, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2015) Risk preferences, probability weighting, and strategy tradeoffs in wildfire management. Risk Analysis 35, 1876–1891.
Risk preferences, probability weighting, and strategy tradeoffs in wildfire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hand M, Katuwal H, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2017) The influence of incident management teams on the deployment of wildfire suppression resources. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, xx–xx.
The influence of incident management teams on the deployment of wildfire suppression resources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmes TP, Calkin DE (2013) Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 246–255.
Econometric analysis of fire suppression production functions for large wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DM (2015) Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications 6, 7537
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtlCjsb7P&md5=ff750f2ac949f4ba0574f77ed1c93945CAS |

Katuwal H, Calkin DE, Hand MS (2016) Production and efficiency of large wildland fire suppression effort: a stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 166, 227–236.
Production and efficiency of large wildland fire suppression effort: a stochastic frontier analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Littell JS, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western US ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecological Applications 19, 1003–1021.
Climate and wildfire area burned in western US ecoprovinces, 1916–2003.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maguire LA, Albright EA (2005) Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions? Forest Ecology and Management 211, 47–58.
Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mendes I (2010) A theoretical economic model for choosing efficient wildfire suppression strategies. Forest Policy and Economics 12, 323–329.
A theoretical economic model for choosing efficient wildfire suppression strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Handmer J, Hessburg PF, Leonard J, McCaffrey S, Odion DC, Schoennagel T, Syphard AD (2014) Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515, 58–66.
Learning to coexist with wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFanu77P&md5=ce36b298954e3e2e3ed54dc193decb5cCAS |

Munich RE (2017) NatCatSERVICE: Natural catastrophe statistics online – the new NatCatSERVICE analysis tool. Available at https://www.munichre.com/en/reinsurance/business/non-life/natcatservice/index.html [Verified 19 May 2017]

National Interagency Fire Center (2017) Historical wildland firefighter fatality reports. Available at https://www.nifc.gov/safety/safety_HistFatality_report.htm [Verified 19 May 2017]

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2017) Glossary A–Z. Available at https://www.nwcg.gov/glossary/a-z [Verified 19 May 2017]

North M, Stephens S, Collins B, Agee J, Aplet G, Franklin J, Fulé P (2015) Reform forest fire management. Science 349, 1280–1281.
Reform forest fire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhs1SrsLzI&md5=2a69f2653e78155a20016c454d8ce483CAS |

Scott JH, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2013) A wildfire risk assessment framework for land and resource management. US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-315. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Spies TA, White EM, Kline JD, Fischer AP, Ager A, Bailey J, Bolte J, Koch J, Platt E, Olsen CS, Jacobs D, Shindler B, Steen-Adams MM, Hammer R (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society 19, art9
Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steelman T (2016) US wildfire governance as social-ecological problem. Ecology and Society 21, art3
US wildfire governance as social-ecological problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stephens SL (2014) Increasing resiliency in frequent fire forests: lessons from the Sierra Nevada and Western Australia. In ‘Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene: Conference Proceedings’, 17–18 September 2013, Washington, DC, USA. (Eds VA Sample, RP Bixler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-71, pp. 123–132. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Stephens SL, Collins BM, Biber E, Fulé PZ (2016) US federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests. Ecosphere 7, e01584
US federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stonesifer CS, Calkin DE, Thompson MP, Kaiden JD (2014) Developing an aviation exposure index to inform risk-based fire management decisions. Journal of Forestry 112, 581–590.

Stonesifer CS, Calkin DE, Thompson MP, Stockmann KD (2016) Fighting fire in the heat of the day: an analysis of operational and environmental conditions of use for large airtankers in United States fire suppression. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 520–533.
Fighting fire in the heat of the day: an analysis of operational and environmental conditions of use for large airtankers in United States fire suppression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Strauss D, Bednar L, Mees R (1989) Do one percent of the forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage? Forest Science 35, 319–328.

Thompson MP (2013) Modeling wildfire incident complexity dynamics. PLoS One 8, e63297
Modeling wildfire incident complexity dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXot1yns78%3D&md5=a8cf1e4ea317c75c6b2757b786154592CAS |

Thompson MP (2014) Social, institutional, and psychological factors affecting wildfire incident decision making. Society & Natural Resources 27, 636–644.
Social, institutional, and psychological factors affecting wildfire incident decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2011) Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 1895–1909.
Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson MP, Calkin DE, Herynk J, McHugh CW, Short KC (2013) Airtankers and wildfire management in the US Forest Service: examining data availability and exploring usage and cost trends. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 223–233.
Airtankers and wildfire management in the US Forest Service: examining data availability and exploring usage and cost trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson MP, Haas JR, Finney MA, Calkin DE, Hand MS, Browne MJ, Halek M, Short KC, Grenfell IC (2015) Development and application of a probabilistic method for wildfire suppression cost modeling. Forest Policy and Economics 50, 249–258.
Development and application of a probabilistic method for wildfire suppression cost modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

USDA Forest Service (2011) National exclusive use airtanker service contract, Section C-1A. USDA Forest Service. (Washington, DC, USA) Available at www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/airtankers/airtanker_contract.pdf [Verified 28 June 2016]

Venn TJ, Calkin DE (2011) Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 327–339.
Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wibbenmeyer MJ, Hand MS, Calkin DE, Venn TJ, Thompson MP (2013) Risk preferences in strategic wildfire decision making: a choice experiment with US wildfire managers. Risk Analysis 33, 1021–1037.
Risk preferences in strategic wildfire decision making: a choice experiment with US wildfire managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wildlands Fire Leadership Council (2012) Implementation of the national cohesive wildland fire management strategy. Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/leadership/documents/wflc_letter_of_support_cohesive_strategy_20120127.pdf [Verified 19 May 2017]

Wilson RS, Winter PL, Maguire LA, Ascher T (2011) Managing wildfire events: risk-based decision making among a group of federal fire managers. Risk Analysis 31, 805–818.
Managing wildfire events: risk-based decision making among a group of federal fire managers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wood SN (2003) Thin plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society – B. Statistical Methodology 65, 95–114.
Thin plate regression splines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |