Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Growth, feed intake and maternal performance of Angus heifers selected for high or low growth and milk production

S. T. Morris A B , D. J. Garrick A , N. Lopez-Villalobos A , P. R. Kenyon A , J. L. Burke A and H. T. Blair A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Sheep Research Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Private Bag 11-222, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: s.t.morris@massey.ac.nz

Animal Production Science 50(6) 349-353 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09181
Submitted: 4 December 2009  Accepted: 10 March 2010   Published: 11 June 2010

Abstract

Weight of calf weaned per cow that incorporates both growth and maternal component traits is an important determinant of profitability for cow–calf production systems. In New Zealand, there is little objective information available on the performance of progeny from bulls selected for either growth or maternal ability when compared under similar pastoral farming conditions. The present experiment produced 84 Angus heifers sired by Angus bulls divergently selected for high (Hi-Gr) or low (Lo-Gr) estimated breeding value (EBV) 600-day weight or high (Hi-Milk) or low (Lo-Milk) 200-day maternal EBV. Each heifer had their liveweight gain from weaning to just before first calving, herbage intake from pasture using the n-alkane method, and maternal performance (calf production after first and second parity) assessed. Liveweights of heifers born to Hi-Gr bulls were generally greater than for all other lines, while there was no difference between Lo-Gr and either of the maternal lines. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in herbage intake between the different genetic lines when measured at Days 310 (days of age from birth) and 880. At Day 400, the Lo-Milk selection line had higher (P < 0.05) intakes than the Hi-Milk, Hi-Gr and Lo-Gr lines. Calves born to the Lo-Gr heifers at the first parity were lighter while the birth weights of calves born at the second parity calving were similar for all the selection lines. Calf weaning weight was lowest (P < 0.05) after both the first and second parity weaning for the Lo-Milk sired heifers. The Lo-Milk heifers produced the least milk at Day 50 during their first lactation while the Hi-Milk heifers produced the most. This experiment confirms that for beef cattle, producers who wish to select bulls to use in their herds based on either high growth rate or high milk EBV, the resultant progeny will outperform those that are average or below average for those particular traits.


Acknowledgement

This project was funded by Meat and Wool New Zealand and Massey University.


References


Arango JA, Van Vleck LD (2002) Size of beef cows; early ideas, new developments. Genetics and Molecular Research 1, 51–63.
PubMed |


Barton RA (1970) The yield and composition of milk of suckled beef cows and their relation to calf liveweight gains. In ‘New Zealand beef production, processing and marketing’. (Ed. AG Campbell) pp. 130–140. (New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science: Petone, New Zealand)

Burke JL, Morris ST, McCutcheon SN, Parker WJ (1998) Compudose®: its effects on the growth, offspring performance, lactational performance, and carcass characteristics of Hereford × Friesian heifers at pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1167–1172.
CrossRef | CAS |

Dove H, Mayes RW (1991) The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 913–952.
CrossRef | CAS |

Gill JL, Hafs HD (1971) Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. Journal of Animal Science 33, 331–336.
CAS | PubMed |


Graser HU, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
CrossRef |

Hickson RE, Lopez-Villolabos N, Kenyon PR, Morris ST (2009) Effect of liveweight gain of pregnant 15-month-old Angus heifers on the milk intake of their first calves and the liveweight of her first and second calves. Animal Production Science 49, 112–120.
CrossRef |

Khadem AA, Morris ST, Parker WJ, Purchas RW, McCutcheon SN (1993) Herbage intake, ingestive behaviour, and growth performance in unbred and once-bred Hereford × Friesian heifers. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 435–444.

Marsh R (1979) Effect of herbage DM allowance on the immediate and longer term performance of young Friesian steers at pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 209–219.

Minick JA, Buchanan DS, Rupert SD (2001) Milk production of crossbred daughters of high- and low-milk EPD Angus and Hereford bulls. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1386–1393.
CAS | PubMed |


Mrode RA (1988) Selection experiments in beef cattle. Part 2. A review of responses and correlated responses. Animal Breeding Abstracts 56, 155–167.

NZ Angus (2010) New Zealand Angus website link to EBV enquiry. Available at http://www.angusnz.com [Verified 25 February 2010]

Vulich SA, Hanrahan JP, O’Riordan EG (1993) Pasture sampling for the estimation of herbage intake using n-alkanes: evaluation of alternative sampling procedures. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 32, 1–11.








Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (1)