Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals

Articles citing this paper

cfArticle2ecfc1291681887$funcTITLE@74116a23

J. W. Oltjen A and S. A. Gunter B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Animal Science Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

B United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Range Research Station, 2000 18th Street, Woodward, OK 73801, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: stacey.gunter@ars.usda.gov

Animal Production Science 55(3) 397-410 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14602
Submitted: 29 May 2014  Accepted: 31 July 2014   Published: 5 February 2015



10 articles found in Crossref database.

Tracing sheep binary C3–C4 diet using stable isotope ratio (δ13C)
Lira Kariny Cavalcante de, Dubeux José Carlos Batista, Lira Mário de Andrade, Carvalho Francisco Fernando Ramos, Santos Mércia Virgínia Ferreira, Cunha Márcio Vieira, Mello Alexandre Carneiro Leão, Jaramillo David M., Neto José Diogenes Pereira
Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2021 20(1). p.288
Decision Making Tools: BeefTracker mobile app for tracking and analysis of beef herd pasture use and location1
Oltjen J. W., Forero L. C., Stackhouse J. W.
Translational Animal Science. 2017 1(3). p.250
Optimising the interrelationship between intake per cow and intake per hectare
Romera Alvaro J., Doole Graeme J.
Animal Production Science. 2015 55(3). p.384
Reference Module in Food Science (2017)
Fulkerson W.J., Lowe K.F.
Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences (2022)
Fulkerson William J., Lowe Kevin F.
A climate-driven model for the dynamics of the free-living stages of Cooperia oncophora
Sauermann Christian W., Leathwick Dave M.
Veterinary Parasitology. 2018 255 p.83
Synthesis: foraging decisions link plants, herbivores and human beings
Provenza F. D., Gregorini P., Carvalho P. C. F.
Animal Production Science. 2015 55(3). p.411
I nvited R eview : Getting more information from your grazing research beyond cattle performance 1 1This review article is based on a presentation by the authors in the symposium “Design, Analysis, and Execution of Quality Grazing Research” at the meeting of the American Society of Animal Science Southern Section, February 1, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia, in conjunction with the SERA-41 Beef Cattle Forage Utilization Group and the South Central Chapter of American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Appreciation is expressed to the symposium sponsors: The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Elanco Animal Health—Stocker District, Vigortone, and Barenbrug USA. , 2 2Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. All programs and services of the USDA are offered on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, marital status, or handicap.
Gunter Stacey A., Cole N. Andy
The Professional Animal Scientist. 2016 32(1). p.31
The assessment of supplementation requirements of grazing ruminants using nutrition models
Tedeschi Luis O, Molle Giovanni, Menendez Hector M, Cannas Antonello, Fonseca Mozart A
Translational Animal Science. 2019 3(2). p.811
Predicting forage intake in extensive grazing systems1
Galyean M. L., Gunter† S. A.
Journal of Animal Science. 2016 94(suppl_6). p.26

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Export Citation Get Permission