Articles citing this paper
Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production assessed using life-cycle assessment. 1. Greenhouse gas emissions
S. G. Wiedemann A B , Eugene J. McGahan A and Caoilinn M. Murphy A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A FSA Consulting, PO Box 2175, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: stephen.g.wiedemann@gmail.com
Animal Production Science 56(9) 1418-1431 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15881
Submitted: 18 December 2015 Accepted: 7 March 2016 Published: 12 May 2016
23 articles found in Crossref database.
From carbon-neutral to climate-neutral supply chains: a multidisciplinary review and research agenda
Guntuka Laharish,
Mukandwal Prabhjot S.,
Aktas Emel, Paluvadi Vamsi Sai Krishna
The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2024 35(3). p.916
Environmental burdens of small-scale intensive pig production in China
Liu Xin,
Cai Zican, Yuan Zengwei
Science of The Total Environment. 2021 770 p.144720
Resource use and greenhouse gas emissions from grain-finishing beef cattle in seven Australian feedlots: a life cycle assessment
Wiedemann Stephen,
Davis Rod,
McGahan Eugene,
Murphy Caoilinn, Redding Matthew
Animal Production Science. 2017 57(6). p.1149
Organic Farming as a Strategy to Reduce Carbon Footprint in Dehesa Agroecosystems: A Case Study Comparing Different Livestock Products
Horrillo Andrés,
Gaspar Paula, Escribano Miguel
Animals. 2020 10(1). p.162
Energy and carbon footprints of chicken and pork from intensive production systems in Argentina
Arrieta Ezequiel M., González Alejandro D.
Science of The Total Environment. 2019 673 p.20
Environmental impacts of pig production systems using European local breeds: The contribution of carbon sequestration and emissions from grazing
Monteiro Alessandra Nardina Trícia Rigo,
Wilfart Aurélie,
Utzeri Valerio Joe,
Batorek Lukač Nina,
Tomažin Urška,
Costa Leonardo Nanni,
Čandek-Potokar Marjeta,
Fontanesi Luca, Garcia-Launay Florence
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019 237 p.117843
Investigating historical dynamics and mitigation scenarios of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from pig production system in China
Chen Xiaowei,
Chen Yun,
Liu Xingxing,
Li Yuliang, Wang Xiaolong
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 296 p.126572
Encyclopedia of Green Materials (2022)
Organic Wastes Amended with Sorbents Reduce N2O Emissions from Sugarcane Cropping
Westermann Maren,
Brackin Richard,
Robinson Nicole,
Salazar Cajas Monica,
Buckley Scott,
Bailey Taleta,
Redding Matthew,
Kochanek Jitka,
Hill Jaye,
Guillou Stéphane,
Freitas Joao Carlos Martins,
Wang Weijin,
Pratt Chris,
Fujinuma Ryo, Schmidt Susanne
Environments. 2021 8(8). p.78
Our Carbon Hoofprint (2023)
Climate Changes Mitigation and Sustainable Bioenergy Harvest Through Animal Waste (2023)
Environmental impacts of the Australian poultry industry. 2. Egg production
Copley M. A.,
Wiedemann S. G.,
McGahan E. J., Bryden Wayne
Animal Production Science. 2023 63(5). p.505
Biogas recovery by anaerobic digestion of Australian agro-industry waste: A review
Tait Stephan,
Harris Peter W., McCabe Bernadette K.
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 299 p.126876
Environmental impacts and resource use from Australian pork production determined using life cycle assessment. 2. Energy, water and land occupation
Wiedemann Stephen G.,
McGahan Eugene J., Murphy Caoilinn M.
Animal Production Science. 2018 58(6). p.1153
Cropland footprints from the perspective of productive land scarcity, malnutrition-related health impacts and biodiversity loss
Ridoutt Bradley, Navarro Garcia Javier
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020 260 p.121150
On-farm trials of practical options for hydrogen sulphide removal from piggery biogas
Skerman A.G.,
Heubeck S.,
Batstone D.J., Tait S.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2018 117 p.675
Removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by adsorption and photocatalysis: a review
Fonseca-Bermúdez Óscar Javier,
Giraldo Liliana,
Sierra-Ramírez Rocío, Moreno-Piraján Juan Carlos
Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2023 21(2). p.1059
Life Cycle Assessment Perspective for Sectoral Adaptation to Climate Change: Environmental Impact Assessment of Pig Production
Ndue Kennedy, Pál Goda
Land. 2022 11(6). p.827
Review: Insect meal: a future source of protein feed for pigs?
DiGiacomo K., Leury B.J.
Animal. 2019 13(12). p.3022
Lignite addition during anaerobic digestion of ammonium rich swine manure enhances biogas production
Wijesinghe Dona Thushari N,
Suter Helen C,
Scales Peter J, Chen Deli
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021 9(1). p.104669
Life cycle assessment of Danish pork exports using different cooling technologies and comparison of upstream supply chain efficiencies between Denmark, China and Australia
Bonou Alexandra,
Colley Tracey A.,
Hauschild Michael Z.,
Olsen Stig I., Birkved Morten
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020 244 p.118816
The societal role of meat: the Dublin Declaration with an Australian perspective
Pethick David W.,
Bryden Wayne L.,
Mann Neil J.,
Masters David G.,
Lean Ian J., Dunshea Frank
Animal Production Science. 2023 63(18). p.1805
A systematic literature review of life cycle assessments on primary pig production: Impacts, comparisons, and mitigation areas
Gislason Styrmir,
Birkved Morten, Maresca Alberto
Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2023 42 p.44
