Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits

D. J. Johnston A B F , S. A. Barwick A B , N. J. Corbet A C , G. Fordyce A D , R. G. Holroyd A E , P. J. Williams A C and H. M. Burrow A F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit1, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

C CSIRO Livestock Industries, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

D Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Charters Towers, Qld 4820, Australia.

E Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: djohnsto@une.edu.au

Animal Production Science 49(6) 399-412 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08276
Submitted: 11 November 2008  Accepted: 17 February 2009   Published: 13 May 2009

Abstract

A total of 2115 heifers from two tropical genotypes (1007 Brahman and 1108 Tropical Composite) raised in four locations in northern Australia were ovarian-scanned every 4–6 weeks to determine the age at the first-observed corpus luteum (CL) and this was used to define the age at puberty for each heifer. Other traits recorded at each time of ovarian scanning were liveweight, fat depths and body condition score. Reproductive tract size was measured close to the start of the first joining period. Results showed significant effects of location and birth month on the age at first CL and associated puberty traits. Genotypes did not differ significantly for the age or weight at first CL; however, Brahman were fatter at first CL and had a small reproductive tract size compared with that of Tropical Composite. Genetic analyses estimated the age at first CL to be moderately to highly heritable for Brahman (0.57) and Tropical Composite (0.52). The associated traits were also moderately heritable, except for reproductive tract size in Brahmans (0.03) and for Tropical Composite, the presence of an observed CL on the scanning day closest to the start of joining (0.07). Genetic correlations among puberty traits were mostly moderate to high and generally larger in magnitude for Brahman than for Tropical Composite. Genetic correlations between the age at CL and heifer- and steer-production traits showed important genotype differences. For Tropical Composite, the age at CL was negatively correlated with the heifer growth rate in their first postweaning wet season (–0.40) and carcass marbling score (–0.49), but was positively correlated with carcass P8 fat depth (0.43). For Brahman, the age at CL was moderately negatively genetically correlated with heifer measures of bodyweight, fatness, body condition score and IGF-I, in both their first postweaning wet and second dry seasons, but was positively correlated with the dry-season growth rate. For Brahman, genetic correlations between the age at CL and steer traits showed possible antagonisms with feedlot residual feed intake (–0.60) and meat colour (0.73). Selection can be used to change the heifer age at puberty in both genotypes, with few major antagonisms with steer- and heifer-production traits.

Additional keywords: beef, fertility, puberty, ultrasound, heritability, genetic correlations.


Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality (and its core partners; The University of New England, NSW Department of Primary Industries, CSIRO and Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries), the Commonwealth funding through the CRC’s Program, and the generous financial support of Meat and Livestock Australia and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). We acknowledge the tremendous contributions of the Australian Agricultural Co., C&R Briggs, Consolidated Pastoral Co., North Australian Pastoral Co., Stanbroke Pastoral Co., J&SM Halbersater, GE&J McCamley, S Kidman & Co., MDH, and the research stations of AgForce Queensland and QDPI&F. We also gratefully acknowledge all Beef CRC participants, both scientists and technical staff, who contributed to or supported the work, including those involved in cattle management, data collection, laboratory analyses and data handling. We especially acknowledge the contributions of Mick Sullivan, Matt Wolcott, Warren Sim, Peggy Olsson, Tracy Longhurst, Trudy Obst, Steve O’Connor, Russ Tyler, Neil Cooper, Graeme Halford and Andrew McCann.


References


Andersen KJ, LeFever DG, Brinks JS, Odde KG (1991) The use of reproductive tract scoring in beef heifers. Agri-Practice 12, 4. open url image1

Arije GF, Wiltbank JN (1971) Age and weight at puberty in Hereford heifers. Journal of Animal Science 33, 401–406.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Barwick SA, Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Sullivan MT (2009a) Genetics of steer daily and residual feed intake in two tropical beef genotypes, and relationships among intake, body composition, growth and other post-weaning measures. Animal Production Science 49, 351–366.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barwick SA, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Holroyd RG, Fordyce G, Wolcott ML, Sim WD, Sullivan MT (2009b) Genetics of heifer performance in ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 367–382.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bergfeld EGM, Rasby RJ, Nielsen MK, Kinder JE (1995) Heifers sired by bulls with either high or low expected progeny differences (EPDs) for marbling do not differ in age at puberty. Animal Reproduction Science 40, 253–259.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bolton RC, Frahm RR, Castree JW, Coleman SW (1987) Genotype × environment interactions involving proportion of Brahman breeding and season of birth. II. Postweaning growth, sexual development and reproductive performance of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 65, 49–55. open url image1

Burns BM, Howitt CJ, Webber RJ, Rudder TH, Tierney TJ, O’Rourke PK (1992) Productivity of Hereford, highgrade Simmental and Belmont Red beef heifers in central Queensland 4. Liveweight and age of heifers at puberty. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 1011–1015.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burrow HM, Seifert GW, Hetzel DJS (1991) Consequences of selection for weaning weight in zebu, Bos Taurus and zebu × Bos Taurus cattle in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 295–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burrow HM, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Holroyd RG, Barendse W, Thompson JM, Griffith GR, Sullivan M (2003) Relationships between carcass and beef quality and components of herd profitability in northern Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 359–362. open url image1

Davis GP (1993) Genetic parameters for tropical beef cattle in northern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 179–198.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Davis GP, Corbet NJ, Mackinnon MJ, Hetzel DJS, Entwistle KW, Dixon R (1993) Response in female fertility and calf growth to selection for pregnancy rate in tropical beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1509–1521.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dow JS, Moore JD, Bailey CM, Foote WD (1982) Onset of puberty in heifers of diverse beef breeds and crosses. Journal of Animal Science 55, 1041–1047.
PubMed |
open url image1

Evans JL, Golden BL, Bourdon RM, Long KL (1999) Additive genetic relationships between heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference in Hereford cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2621–2628.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Ferrell CL (1982) Effects of postweaning rate of gain in onset of puberty and productive performance of heifers of different breeds. Journal of Animal Science 55, 1272–1283.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, James TA, Reid DJ (1988) The effect of post-weaning growth on the fertility of Brahman cross heifers. Proceeding of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 396. open url image1

Garcia MR, Amstalden M, Williams SW, Stanko RL, Morrison CD, Keisler DH, Nizielski SE, Williams GL (2002) Serum leptin and its adipose gene expression during pubertal development, the estrous cycle and different seasons in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2158–2167.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Gilmour AR , Cullis BR , Welham SJ , Thompson R (1999) ASREML reference manual. NSW Agriculture Biometric Bulletin 3. NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW, Australia.

Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Gogel B, Thompson R (2004) An efficient computing strategy for prediction in linear mixed models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 44, 571–586.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Graser H-U, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 913–921. open url image1

Gregory KE, Laster DB, Cundiff LV, Smith GM, Koch RM (1979) Characterization of biological types of cattle – Cycle III: II. Growth rate and puberty in females. Journal of Animal Science 49, 461–471. open url image1

Gregory KE, Lunstra DD, Cundiff LV, Koch RM (1991) Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for puberty and scrotal traits of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2235–2242. open url image1

Gregory KE, Cundiff LV, Koch RM (1995) Genetic and phenotypic (co)variances for production traits of female populations of purebred and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2235–2242.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Griffin PG, Ginther OJ (1992) Research applications of ultrasonic imaging in reproductive biology. Journal of Animal Science 70, 953–972.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Hall JB, Staigmiller RB, Bellows RA, Short RE, Moseley WM, Bellows SE (1995) Body composition and metabolic profiles associated with puberty in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3409–3420.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Hearnshaw H, Arthur PF, Barlow R, Kohun PJ, Darnell RE (1994) Evaluation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus straightbreds and crosses. II. Postweaning growth, puberty and pelvic size of heifers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 795–805.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hetzel DJS, Mackinnon MJ, Dixon R, Entwistle KW (1989) Fertility in a tropical beef herd divergently selected for pregnancy rate. Animal Production 49, 73–81. open url image1

Jones EJ, Armstrong JD, Harvey RW (1991) Changes in metabolites, metabolic hormones, and luteinizing hormone before puberty in Angus, Braford, Charolais, and Simmental heifers. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1607–1615.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Laster DB, Smith GM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE (1979) Characterization of biological types of cattle (cycle II) II. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 48, 500–508.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Mackinnon MJ, Hetzel DJS, Taylor JF (1989) Genetic environment effects on the fertility of beef cattle in a tropical environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 1085–1097.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mackinnon MJ, Hetzel DJS, Corbet NJ, Bryan RP, Dixon R (1990) Correlated responses to selection for cow fertility in a tropical beef herd. Animal Production 50, 417–424. open url image1

MacNeil MD, Cundiff LV, Dinkel DA, Koch RM (1984) Genetic correlations among sex-limited traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1171–1180.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Martin LC, Brinks JS, Bourdon RM, Cundiff LV (1992) Genetic effects on beef heifer puberty and subsequent reproduction. Animal Science 70, 4006–4017.
CAS |
open url image1

Mialon MM, Renand G, Krass D, Menissier F (2001) Genetic relations between cyclic ovarian activity in heifers and cows and beef traits in males. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 273–287.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Morgan JHL (1981) A comparison of breeds and their crosses for beef production. II. Growth and puberty of heifers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 811–824. open url image1

Morris CA, Wilson JA, Bennett GL, Cullen NG, Hickey SM, Hunter JC (2000) Genetic parameters for growth, puberty, and beef cow reproductive traits in a puberty selection experiment. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 83–91. open url image1

Patterson DJ, Corah LR, Brethour JR, Higgins GH, Stevenson JS (1992) Evaluation of reproductive traits in Bos Taurus and Bos indicus crossbred heifers: relationship of age of puberty to length of the postpartum interval to estrus. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1994–1999.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Perry D, Shorthose WR, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM (2001) Methods used in the CRC program for the determination of carcass yield and beef quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 953–957.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Phocas F, Sapa J (2004) Genetic parameters for growth, reproductive performance, calving ease and suckling performance in beef cattle heifers. Animal Science 79, 41–48. open url image1

Pierson RA, Ginther OJ (1988) Ultrasonic imaging of the ovaries and uterus in cattle. Theriogenology 29, 21–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Post TB, Reich MM (1980) Puberty in tropical breeds of heifers as monitored by plasma progesterone. Proceeding of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 61–62. open url image1

Prayaga KC (2004) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 3. Fertility and calf survival traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 811–824.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Taylor WJ, Rudder TH (1986) Reduction of sale age for export carcases: will it affect beef producers in tropical regions? Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 16, 379–382. open url image1

Thallman RM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Koch RM (1999) Germplasm evaluation in beef cattle – Cycle IV: postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2651–2659.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Vargas CA, Elzo MA, Chase CC Jr, Chenoweth PJ, Olson TA (1998) Influence of frame size and body composition on performance of Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2536–2541. open url image1

Wettemann RP, Bossis I (2000) Energy intake regulates ovarian function in beef cattle. Proceedings of the American Society Animal Science 1999, 1–10. open url image1

Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Iker CL, Thompson JM, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 383–398.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yelich JV, Wettemann RP, Dolezal HG, Lusby KS, Bishop DK, Spicer LJ (1995) Effects of growth rate on carcass composition and lipid partitioning at puberty and growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin, and metabolites before puberty in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2390–2405.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Yilmaz A, Davis ME, Simmen RCM (2006) Analysis of female reproductive traits in Angus beef cattle divergently selected for blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration. Theriogenology 65, 1180–1190.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1









1 Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit is a joint venture of New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England.