Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effect of dairy farm intensification on farm operation, economics and risk: a marginal analysis

W. J. Anderson A C and B. J. Ridler B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

B 142 Ballantyne Road, Poraiti, R.D.2, Napier 4182, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: W.J.Anderson@massey.ac.nz

Animal Production Science 57(7) 1350-1356 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16457
Submitted: 15 July 2016  Accepted: 15 February 2017   Published: 30 March 2017

Abstract

Recent intensification of New Zealand dairy farms appears to be premised on both increased production and milksolid (MS) price covering the increased capital and running costs resulting from intensification. The present paper examined the effect of intensification on production and profitability of a self-contained pasture-fed 330-cow dairy farm (DairyNZ System 1). A resource-allocation model analysed increases in the farm herd from 330 cows through to 375, 450, 525, 600 or 700 cows (DairyNZ System 5). Each discrete additional capital investment altered the income and farm working expenses. There were two options, namely constant average per-cow production or increased average per-cow production. Each herd-size scenario was run for prices ranging from NZ$4.20 to NZ$10/kg MS, so as to identify which level economically justified the intensification and to estimate risk, taken as rate of change in profit due to price change. It was found that for constant per-cow production, System 2 and System 3 scenarios were more profitable but slightly riskier than was System 1 at above NZ$4.20/kg MS. System 4 was less profitable than Systems 1–3 at less than NZ$7/kg MS. At less than NZ$10/kg MS, System 5 was the least profitable and the riskiest scenario. Where per-cow production increased, Systems 2–4 were more profitable and marginally riskier than was System 1. System 5 was more profitable than System 1 at over NZ$7/kg MS, but never as profitable as System 4. System 5 was the riskiest scenario. The model can provide a means of evaluating the effects of intensification under future milk-price scenarios.

Additional keywords: computer simulations, dairy farm systems, optimum resource use, pasture, profit, purchased feed.


References

AFRC (1995) ‘Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. Agricultural and Food Research Council.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Anderson WJ, Ridler BJ (2010a) Application of resource allocation optimisation to provide profitable options for dairy farm systems. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 70, 291–295.

Anderson WJ, Ridler BJ (2010b) The effect of increasing per cow production and changing herd structure on economic and environmental outcomes within a farm system. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 215–220.

Dairy NZ (2012) ‘Facts and figures for New Zealand dairy farmers booklet, version 2.’ (DairyNZ) Available at https://www.dairynz.co.nz/media/2816711/facts-and-figures-dairynz.pdf [Verified 7 March 2017]

Dewes A (2014) Economic resilience and economic performance of dairy farms in the Upper Waikato. Tomorrow’s farms today. Unpublished MSc Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Doole GJ, Kingwell R (2015) Efficient economic and environmental management of pastoral systems: theory and application. Agricultural Systems 133, 73–84.
Efficient economic and environmental management of pastoral systems: theory and application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fraser P, Ridler BJ, Anderson WJ (2014) ‘The intensification of the NZ dairy industry: Ferrari cows being run on two-stroke fuel on a road to nowhere?’ (New Zealand Agricultural Resource Economics Society (NZARES)) Available at http://purl.umn.edu/187491 [Verified 8 February 2017]

Glassey CB, Roach CG, Lee JM, Clark DA (2013) The impact of farming without nitrogen fertiliser for ten years on pasture yield and composition, milksolids production and profitability; a research farmlet comparison. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grasslands Association 75, 71–78.

Ho CKM, Newman M, Dalley DE, Little S, Lane N, Wales WJ (2012) Performance, return and risk in dairy systems. Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 107–117.

Hurley EM, Trafford G, Dooley AE, Anderson WJ (2013) The usefulness and efficacy of linear programming models as farm management tools. OneFarm/AgriOne. Available at www.agrione.ac.nz [Verified 8 February 2017]

Malcolm LR (2004) Farm management analysis: a core discipline, simple sums, sophisticated thinking! AFBM Journal 1, 45–56.

Malcolm B, Ho CKM, Armstrong DP, Doyle PT, Tarrante KA (2012) Whole farm analysis of dairy systems. Australasian Agribusiness Review 20, 39–58.

Pellow R, Lee S, Metherell A, McCallum R, Moir J, Roberts A, Wheeler D (2015) Assessing the impact of input choices within Overseer ® (V6) on the modelled N losses to water for Lincoln University Dairy Farm (LUDF). Occasional report no. 26. Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Ridler BJ, Anderson WJ, Fraser P (2012) ‘Milk, money, muck and metrics. Inefficient resource allocation by New Zealand dairy farmers.’ (New Zealand Agricultural Resource Economics Society (NZARES)) Available at http://purl.umn.edu/96492 [Verified 8 February 2017]

Ridler BJ, Anderson WJ, Fraser P, McCallum RL (2014) ‘Win/Win. Improving farm profit and the environment through the application of farm management principles.’ (New Zealand Agricultural Resource Economics Society (NZARES)) Available at http://purl.umn.edu/187404 [Verified 8 February 2017]

Ridler BJ, Anderson WJ, McCallum R (2014a) Importance of detail in per cow production. Proceedings of 6th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 68–70.

Ridler BJ, Anderson WJ, McCallum R (2014b) Herd replacement rate and production efficiency. Proceedings of 6th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 71–74.

Santarossa JM, Stott AW, Wooliams JA, Brotherstone S, Wall E, Coffey MP (2001) An economic evaluation of long term sustainability in the dairy sector. Animal Science 79, 315–325.

Shadbolt N (2007) Dairy farming internationally and how it compares. Primary Industry Management 10, 6–8.

Shadbolt N, Gardner JG (2006) Farm investments: alternative ownership structures that address the liquidity versus profitability conundrum. Journal of International Farm Management 3, 40–51.