Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variation for seed coat and pod wall percentage and other traits in a germplasm collection and historical cultivars of lupins

J. C. Clements A C , M. Dracup B , B. J. Buirchell B and C. G. Smith B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Agriculture Western Australia, Locked Bag 4, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: clem@cyllene.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(1) 75-83 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03114
Submitted: 30 May 2003  Accepted: 10 December 2004   Published: 31 January 2005

Abstract

Accessions totalling 1425 from the Australian Lupin Collection representing 9 Old World lupin species and Lupinus mutabilis Sweet, a New World species, were sampled for seed coat and pod wall percentage, seed weight, and number of seeds per pod. These traits are of importance to the breeding objective of lowering seed coat and pod wall proportions in crop lupins. Seed coat percentage mean values among the species ranged from 12.7 in L. mutabilis to 33.7 in L. pilosus L. The 4 species that have been subject to selection (L. mutabilis, L. albus L., L. angustifolius L., and L. luteus L.) had lower mean seed coat percentages than the other species with little domestication. The rough-seeded lupin species had higher seed coat percentages relative to the smooth-seeded species except for L. micranthus Guss., which had 31.5% seed coat and small seeds. Within L. angustifolius there was no difference between the mean seed coat percentage values for wild v. domesticated or hard v. soft-seeded entries, although wild accessions of L. angustifolius tended to have lower seed weight, higher pod wall percentage, and more seeds per pod than domesticated accessions. There was no correlation in L. angustifolius germplasm between seed coat percentage and pod wall percentage, indicating that selection for one will not influence the other character. Accessions with the lowest seed coat percentage were from Turkey, Greece, and Cyprus, and those with the lowest average pod wall percentage were from Spain and Cyprus. Mean pod wall percentages ranged from 30.9 in L. albus to 57.1 in L. micranthus; figures that are high compared with other legumes. Large ranges in seed weight were found particularly in L. albus, L. pilosus, and L. angustifolius.

In addition to the germplasm collection, 21 Australian cultivars, released from 1967 to 1999, were evaluated at one site over 2 years for the same traits. There was a negative correlation between seed coat percentage and seed weight for both L. angustifolius historical cultivars and germplasm, indicating that further reductions in seed coat percentage could be achieved by crossing large seeded types with low seed coat types. Pod wall percentage was negatively correlated with both year of release and yield, and positively correlated with days to flowering. These data support other findings that breeding for the reduction of pod wall can lead to yield improvements. The germplasm collection assessed here provides lines with lower seed coat and pod wall compared with what is available in breeding lines or cultivars.

Additional keywords: narrow-leafed lupin, white lupin, yellow lupin, pearl lupin, podwall, hull, fibre.


Acknowledgments

The Grains Research and Development Corporation funded this research. We acknowledge the work of Mr Mark Reader, from 1995 to 1998, on germplasm data collection and processing. We thank the following people for their technical assistance: Margaret Collins, Gordon Francis, Doug Francis, John Quealy, Ali Bhatti, Krishna Mann, Rebecca Carpenter, Liam Cranley, and Hussein Al Edany.


References


Ali Khan ST (1993) Seed hull content in field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 73, 611–613. open url image1

Anúnez de Mayolo S (1982) Tarwi in ancient Peru. ‘Agricultural and nutritional aspects of lupines. Proceedings of the 1st International Lupin Workshop’. (Ed.  R Gross , ES Bunting ) pp. 1–11. (GTZ: Eschborn, Germany)


Brillouet JM, Riochet D (1983) Cell wall polysaccharides and lignin in cotyledons and hulls of seeds from various lupin (Lupinus L.) species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 861–868. open url image1

Buirchell BJ, Cowling WA (1992) Domestication of rough-seeded lupins. Journal of Agriculture–Western Australia 33, 131–137. open url image1

Buirchell BJ, Cowling WA (1998) Genetic resources in lupins. ‘Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization’. (Eds JS Gladstones, CA Atkins, J Hamblin) pp. 263–290. (CAB International: Oxon, UK)

Clements JC, Cowling WA (1990) The Australian Lupin Collection. Passport data for wild and semi-domesticated accessions introduced to Australia to 1990. Research Report 1/90, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth.

Clements JC, Cowling WA (1991) 1991 Catalogue of the Australian lupin collection (Including field evaluation data for wild, semi-domesticated and fully domesticated accessions). Research Report 3/91, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth.

Clements JC, Cowling WA (1994) Patterns of morphological diversity in relation to geographical origins of wild Lupinus angustifolius from the Aegean region. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 41, 109–122.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Clements JC, Cowling WA, Buirchell BJ (1996) Relationship between morphological variation and geographical origin or selection history in Lupinus pilosus. Plant Breeding 115, 16–22. open url image1

Clements JC, Dracup M (2001) Lowering the seed hull proportion in narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius). ‘Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Grain Legumes’. Cracow, Poland. (European Association for Grain Legume Research)


Clements JC, Dracup M, Galwey N (2002) Effect of genotype and environment on proportion of seed hull and pod wall in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1147–1154.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cowling, WA , Buirchell, BJ ,  and  Tapia, ME (1998). ‘Lupin, L Promoting the use of underutilised and neglected crops. 23.’ (Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plants Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy)

Cowling WA, Clements JC (1993) Association between collection site pH and chlorosis in Lupinus angustifolius induced by a fine-textured, alkaline soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1821–1836.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup M, Reader MA, Palta JA (1998) Variation in yield of narrow-leafed lupin caused by terminal drought. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 799–810.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Edwards AC, van Barneveld RJ (1998) Lupins for livestock and fish. ‘Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization’. (Eds JS Gladstones, CA Atkins, J Hamblin) pp. 385–410. (CAB International: Oxon, UK)

Escribano MR, Santalla M, de Ron AM (1997) Genetic diversity in pod and seed quality traits of common bean populations from northwestern Spain. Euphytica 93, 71–81.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Flinn PC, Black RG, Iyer L, Brouwer JB, Meares C (1998) Estimating the food processing characteristics of pulses by near infrared spectroscopy, using ground or whole samples. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 6, 213–220. open url image1

Genstat 5 Committee (1993). ‘Genstat 5 Release 3 reference manual.’ (Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK)

Gladstones JS (1967) Selection for economic characters in Lupinus angustifolius and L. digitatus. 1. Non-shattering pods. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 7, 360–366. open url image1

Gladstones JS (1970) Lupins as crop plants. Field Crop Abstracts 23, 123–148. open url image1

Gladstones JS (1974) Lupins of the Mediterranean region and Africa. Technical Bulletin No. 26, Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth.

Gladstones JS, Crosbie GB (1978) Lupin wild types introduced into Western Australia to 1973. Technical Bulletin No.43, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth.

Hardy A, Huyghe C, Papineau J (1997) Dry matter accumulation and partitioning, and seed yield in indeterminate Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 91–101.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Harris DJ (2000) Selection of L. angustifolius varieties with improved oil/fat level.11. Final Report to the Grains Research Committee of Western Australia, Canberra, Australia.

Jones RAC, Cowling WA (1995) Resistance to seed transmission of cucumber mosaic virus in narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1339–1352.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jones RAC, Latham LJ (1996) Natural resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in lupin species. Annals of Applied Biology 129, 523–542. open url image1

Lagunes-Espinoza LC, Huyghe C, Papineau J, Pacault D (1999) Effect of genotype and environment on pod wall proportion in white lupin: consequences to seed yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 575–582. open url image1

Li J, Chen L, Tang Z, Shang X, Yan S (2001) Genetic study and commercial application of the yellow-seeded rapeseed (Brassica napus L. ‘Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rapeseed Science’. (Ed.  L Houli , F Tingdong , J Hamblin ) pp. 28–33. (Science Press: New York)


Luckett D (2000) Lupini bean—large-seeded, bitter albus lupin. Agnote No. DPI-329, 1st edn. NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW, Australia.

Lush WM, Evans LT (1980) The seed coats of cowpeas and other grain legumes: structure in relation to function. Field Crops Research 3, 267–286.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Miao ZH, Fortune JA, Gallagher J (2001) Anatomical structure and nutritive value of lupin seed coats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 985–993.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

van der Poel AFB, Dellaert LMW, Norel A, van Helsper JPFG (1992) The digestibility in piglets of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) as affected by breeding towards the absence of condensed tannins. The British Journal of Nutrition 68, 793–800.
PubMed |
open url image1

Rashid A, Rakow G, Downey RK (1994) Development of yellow seeded Brassica napus through interspecific crosses. Plant Breeding 112, 127–134. open url image1

Reader M, Dracup M (1998) Hull and pod wall weights in lupin. ‘Crop updates 1998’. (Agriculture Western Australia: Perth, W. Aust.)

Reader MA, Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1995) Time to flowering in narrow-leafed lupin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1063–1077.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stombaugh SK, Jung HG, Orf JH, Somers DA (2000) Genotypic and environmental variation in soybean seed cell wall polysaccharides. Crop Science 40, 408–412. open url image1

Sweetingham MW, Henderson J, Yang HA, Cowling WA, Buirchell BJ (1994) Glasshouse screening of Lupinus species for resistance to brown spot and Pleiochaeta root rot. ‘Proceedings of the First Australian Lupin Technical Symposium’. (Ed.  M Dracup , J Palta , J Hamblin ) p. 313. (Department of Agriculture Western Australia: South Perth)


Waldia RS, Singh VP, Sood DR, Sardana PK, Mehla IS (1996) Association and variation among cooking quality traits in Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science and Technology 33, 397–402. open url image1

Wallace DH, Munger HM (1996) Studies of the physiological basis for yield differences II. Variation in dry matter distribution among aerial organs for several dry bean varieties. Crop Science 6, 503–506. open url image1