Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences

Articles citing this paper

A DNA barcode database of Australia’s freshwater macroinvertebrate fauna

M. E. Carew A , S. J. Nichols B , J. Batovska C , R. St Clair D G , N. P. Murphy E , M. J. Blacket C and M. E. Shackleton F H
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.

D Environment Protection Authority, 200 Victoria Street, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.

E Department of Ecology, Environment, and Evolution, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.

F Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre, La Trobe University, 133 McKoy Street, Wodonga, Vic. 3690, Australia.

G Present address: Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia.

H Corresponding author. Email: m.shackleton@latrobe.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 68(10) 1788-1802 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16304
Submitted: 7 September 2016  Accepted: 6 January 2017   Published: 30 March 2017



29 articles found in Crossref database.

PIDS: A User-Friendly Plant DNA Fingerprint Database Management System
Jiang Bin, Zhao Yikun, Yi Hongmei, Huo Yongxue, Wu Haotian, Ren Jie, Ge Jianrong, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Fengge
Genes. 2020 11(4). p.373
Comprehensive DNA barcodes for species identification and discovery of cryptic diversity in mayfly larvae from South Korea: Implications for freshwater ecosystem biomonitoring
Suh Kyong In, Hwang Jeong Mi, Bae Yeon Jae, Kang Ji Hyoun
Entomological Research. 2019 49(1). p.46
Towards routine DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates using bulk samples for freshwater bioassessment: Effects of debris and storage conditions on the recovery of target taxa
Nichols Susan J., Kefford Ben J., Campbell Catriona D., Bylemans Jonas, Chandler Eloise, Bray Jonathan P., Shackleton Michael, Robinson Katie L., Carew Melissa E., Furlan Elise M.
Freshwater Biology. 2020 65(4). p.607
Scaling up DNA metabarcoding for freshwater macrozoobenthos monitoring
Elbrecht Vasco, Steinke Dirk
Freshwater Biology. 2019 64(2). p.380
Development of a flow‐sensitive macroinvertebrate index for Australian rivers
Chessman Bruce C., Metzeling Leon, Robinson David P.
River Research and Applications. 2022 38(5). p.846
Can you see the algae for the slime? Temporal patterns of biofilm food quality and quantity in lowland rivers
McInerney Paul J., Shackleton Michael E., McPhan Luke, Holland Aleicia, Rees Gavin N.
Ecosphere. 2023 14(10).
A High-Performance Database Management System for Managing and Analyzing Large-Scale SNP Data in Plant Genotyping and Breeding Applications
Zhao Yikun, Jiang Bin, Huo Yongxue, Yi Hongmei, Tian Hongli, Wu Haotian, Wang Rui, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Fengge
Agriculture. 2021 11(11). p.1027
Distribution of Palinuridae and Scyllaridae phyllosoma larvae within the East Australian Current: a climate change hot spot
Woodings Laura N., Murphy Nicholas P., Jeffs Andrew, Suthers Iain M., Liggins Geoffrey W., Strugnell Jan M.
Marine and Freshwater Research. 2019 70(7). p.1020
How does molecular taxonomy for deriving river health indices correlate with traditional morphological taxonomy?
Shackleton M.E., Dafforn K.A., Murphy N.P., Greenfield P., Cassidy M., Besley C.H.
Ecological Indicators. 2021 125 p.107537
A Custom Regional DNA Barcode Reference Library for Lichen-Forming Fungi of the Intermountain West, USA, Increases Successful Specimen Identification
Kerr Michael, Leavitt Steven D.
Journal of Fungi. 2023 9(7). p.741
Estimating intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data
Elbrecht Vasco, Vamos Ecaterina Edith, Steinke Dirk, Leese Florian
PeerJ. 2018 6 p.e4644
A survey of aquatic macroinvertebrates in a river from the dry corridor of Nicaragua using biological indices and DNA barcoding
Mendoza‐Ramírez Bryant H., Páiz‐Medina Lucía, Salvatierra‐Suárez Thelma, Hernández Nelvia, Huete‐Pérez Jorge A.
Ecology and Evolution. 2022 12(11).
MARES, a replicable pipeline and curated reference database for marine eukaryote metabarcoding
Arranz Vanessa, Pearman William S., Aguirre J. David, Liggins Libby
Scientific Data. 2020 7(1).
Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding?
Carew Melissa E., Coleman Rhys A., Hoffmann Ary A.
PeerJ. 2018 6 p.e4980
Short COI markers for freshwater macroinvertebrate metabarcoding
Vamos Ecaterina, Elbrecht Vasco, Leese Florian
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics. 2017 1 p.e14625
Exploring the potential of metabarcoding to disentangle macroinvertebrate community dynamics in intermittent streams
Laini Alex, Beermann Arne J., Bolpagni Rossano, Burgazzi Gemma, Elbrecht Vasco, Zizka Vera M. A., Leese Florian, Viaroli Pierluigi
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics. 2020 4
Use of implanted acoustic tags to assess platypus movement behaviour across spatial and temporal scales
Bino Gilad, Kingsford Richard T., Grant Tom, Taylor Matthew D., Vogelnest Larry
Scientific Reports. 2018 8(1).
DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work
Weigand Hannah, Beermann Arne J., Čiampor Fedor, Costa Filipe O., Csabai Zoltán, Duarte Sofia, Geiger Matthias F., Grabowski Michał, Rimet Frédéric, Rulik Björn, Strand Malin, Szucsich Nikolaus, Weigand Alexander M., Willassen Endre, Wyler Sofia A., Bouchez Agnès, Borja Angel, Čiamporová-Zaťovičová Zuzana, Ferreira Sónia, Dijkstra Klaas-Douwe B., Eisendle Ursula, Freyhof Jörg, Gadawski Piotr, Graf Wolfram, Haegerbaeumer Arne, van der Hoorn Berry B., Japoshvili Bella, Keresztes Lujza, Keskin Emre, Leese Florian, Macher Jan N., Mamos Tomasz, Paz Guy, Pešić Vladimir, Pfannkuchen Daniela Maric, Pfannkuchen Martin Andreas, Price Benjamin W., Rinkevich Buki, Teixeira Marcos A.L., Várbíró Gábor, Ekrem Torbjørn
Science of The Total Environment. 2019 678 p.499
Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance
Piper Alexander M, Batovska Jana, Cogan Noel O I, Weiss John, Cunningham John Paul, Rodoni Brendan C, Blacket Mark J
GigaScience. 2019 8(8).
What’s wrong with the Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS)?
Chessman Bruce C.
Marine and Freshwater Research. 2021 72(8). p.1110
Metabarcoding hyperdiverse kelp holdfast communities on temperate reefs: An experimental approach to inform future studies
Arranz Vanessa, Liggins Libby, Aguirre J. David
Environmental DNA. 2022 4(3). p.492
Species-level dataset is required for setting biodiversity conservation priorities for freshwater macroinvertebrates in Melbourne streams
Tsyrlin Edward, Carew Melissa, Hoffmann Ary A., Linke Simon, Coleman Rhys A.
Journal of Environmental Management. 2023 331 p.117186
18S-V9 DNA metabarcoding detects the effect of water-quality impairment on stream biofilm eukaryotic assemblages
Minerovic Alison D., Potapova Marina G., Sales Christopher M., Price Jacob R., Enache Mihaela D.
Ecological Indicators. 2020 113 p.106225
More (or less?) bounce for the ounce: a comparison of environmental DNA and classical approaches for bioassessment
McInerney Paul J., Rees Gavin N.
Marine and Freshwater Research. 2018 69(6). p.992
The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World’s Rivers: An Overview
Feio Maria João, Hughes Robert M., Callisto Marcos, Nichols Susan J., Odume Oghenekaro N., Quintella Bernardo R., Kuemmerlen Mathias, Aguiar Francisca C., Almeida Salomé F.P., Alonso-EguíaLis Perla, Arimoro Francis O., Dyer Fiona J., Harding Jon S., Jang Sukhwan, Kaufmann Philip R., Lee Samhee, Li Jianhua, Macedo Diego R., Mendes Ana, Mercado-Silva Norman, Monk Wendy, Nakamura Keigo, Ndiritu George G., Ogden Ralph, Peat Michael, Reynoldson Trefor B., Rios-Touma Blanca, Segurado Pedro, Yates Adam G.
Water. 2021 13(3). p.371
Our love-hate relationship with DNA barcodes, the Y2K problem, and the search for next generation barcodes
Marcus Jeffrey M.
AIMS Genetics. 2018 05(01). p.001
Metabarcoding unsorted kick‐samples facilitates macroinvertebrate‐based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA
Pereira‐da‐Conceicoa Lyndall, Elbrecht Vasco, Hall Andie, Briscoe Andrew, Barber‐James Helen, Price Benjamin
Environmental DNA. 2021 3(2). p.353
Toward a global DNA barcode reference library of the intolerant nonbiting midge genus Rheocricotopus Brundin, 1956
Lin Xiao‐Long, Jiang Kun, Liu Wen‐Bin, Liu Wei, Bu Wen‐Jun, Wang Xin‐Hua, Mo Lidong
Ecology and Evolution. 2021 11(17). p.12161
Identifying North American freshwater invertebrates using DNA barcodes: are existing COI sequence libraries fit for purpose?
Curry Colin J., Gibson Joel F., Shokralla Shadi, Hajibabaei Mehrdad, Baird Donald J.
Freshwater Science. 2018 37(1). p.178

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Export Citation Get Permission