Low-cost device for retrieval of moorings deployed with underwater remote release systemsD. A. Crook A C , B. J. Adair A and L. J. Hetherington A B
A Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
B Present address: Nature Glenelg Trust, PO Box 2177, Mount Gambier, SA 5290, Australia.
C Corresponding author: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Marine and Freshwater Research 69(3) 473-476 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17189
Submitted: 1 March 2017 Accepted: 30 August 2017 Published: 21 September 2017
Underwater acoustic and timed-release systems are commonly deployed with sensors and other equipment for ecological and oceanographic research in aquatic environments. These systems allow equipment deployed at depth to be remotely released from their moorings for retrieval. However, a current limitation is that most systems do not incorporate mechanisms for retrieval of the mooring anchor and attachments (e.g. shackles, cable). Herein we provide a detailed description and evaluation of a ‘retrieval pod’ that can be attached directly to remotely released underwater devices to facilitate mooring retrieval. The system was tested using acoustic release telemetry receivers under field conditions in a large estuary in the Northern Territory, Australia. Six receivers fitted with pods were retrieved from the field after two consecutive 6-month deployments (12 retrievals in total) with no failed mooring retrievals. Although our tests were confined to shallow depths (<8 m), it should be straightforward to modify the system for use in deeper water by increasing the spool capacity. The retrieval pods are reusable, require minimal construction skills and can be assembled from basic equipment available at most hardware or boating stores, making them a convenient and low-cost option for the retrieval of moorings deployed with remote release systems.
Additional keywords: acoustic telemetry, fish migration, mooring retrieval, oceanography, transceiver.
ReferencesFujioka, K., Hobday, A. J., Kawabe, R., Miyashita, K., Itoh, T., and Takao, Y. (2010). Interannual variation in summer habitat use by juvenile southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) in southern Western Australia. Fisheries Oceanography 19, 183–195.
| Interannual variation in summer habitat use by juvenile southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) in southern Western Australia.CrossRef |
Heupel, M. R., Semmens, J. M., and Hobday, A. J. (2006). Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Marine and Freshwater Research 57, 1–13.
| Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays.CrossRef |
Hussey, N. E., Kessel, S. T., Aarestrup, K., Cooke, S. J., Cowley, P. D., Fisk, A. T., Harcourt, R. G., Holland, K. N., Iverson, S. J., Kocik, J. F., Mills Flemming, J. E., and Whoriskey, F. G. (2015). Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642.
| Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world.CrossRef |
Huveneers, C., Simpfendorfer, C. A., Kim, S., Semmens, J. M., Hobday, A. J., Pederson, H., Stieglitz, T., Vallee, R., Webber, D., Heupel, M. R., and Peddemors, V. (2016). The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 825–835.
| The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers.CrossRef |
Stark, K. E., Jackson, G. D., and Lyle, J. M. (2005). Tracking arrow squid movements with an automated acoustic telemetry system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 299, 167–177.
| Tracking arrow squid movements with an automated acoustic telemetry system.CrossRef |
Webber, D. (2009). VEMCO acoustic telemetry new user guide. Document DOC-004934-01, Amirix Systems Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada.