Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WF > WF08034
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 17(4)

Assessing the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio’s ability to map burn severity in the boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of Alaska’s national parks

Jennifer L. Allen A C and Brian Sorbel B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Park Service, Fairbanks Administrative Office, 4175 Geist Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709, USA.

B National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office, 240 W 5th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: jennifer_allen@nps.gov

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(4) 463-475 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08034
Submitted: 26 February 2008  Accepted: 17 March 2008   Published: 6 August 2008

Abstract

Burn severity strongly influences post-fire vegetation succession, soil erosion, and wildlife populations in the fire-adapted boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of Alaska. Therefore, satellite-derived maps of burn severity in the remote Alaskan landscape are a useful tool in both fire and resource management practices. To assess satellite-derived measures of burn severity in Alaska we calculated the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) from pre- and post-fire Landsat TM/ETM+ data. We established 289 composite burn index (CBI) plots in or near four national park areas between 2001 and 2003 in order to compare ground-based measurements of burn severity with satellite-derived values of burn severity. Within the diverse vegetation types measured, a strong linear relationship between a differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) and CBI for eight out of the nine fire assessments was found; R2 values ranged from 0.45 to 0.88. The variations in severity among four pre-fire vegetation types were examined and a significant difference in the average dNBR and average CBI values among the vegetation types was found. Black spruce forests overall had the strongest relationship with dNBR, while the high severity white spruce forests had the poorest fit with dNBR. Deciduous forests and tall shrub plots had the lowest average remotely sensed burn severity (dNBR), but not the lowest ground severity among the vegetation types sampled. The tundra vegetation sampled had the lowest ground severity. Finally, a significant difference was detected between initial and extended assessments of dNBR in tundra vegetation types. The results indicated that the dNBR can be used as an effective means to map burn severity in boreal forest and tundra ecosystems for the climatic conditions and fire types that occurred in our study sites.

Additional keywords: dNBR, Landsat, Picea, remote sensing, wildland fire.


Acknowledgements

Thanks to the staff of the National Park Service Eastern and Western Alaska Area Fire Management Programs for their assistance in collecting burn severity plot information. Special thanks go to Marsha Henderson, Larry Weddle, and Ken Adkisson for their valuable assistance with project planning and field work logistics. We also thank the Doyon Native Corporation for granting access to land within the boundary of Yukon–Charley Rivers National Preserve and the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources for granting access to land burned by the Milepost 85 fire. Thanks to Karen Murphy with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and Jennifer Hrobak with the Bureau of Land Management for their assistance in fieldwork on the Milepost 85 fire. The authors thank the staff at the USGS EROS Data Center, particularly Stephen Howard, Don Ohlen, and Kari Pabst, for completing all scene acquisition and image processing work. Also, thanks to Carl Key and Nate Benson for all their assistance. Finally, the authors wish to recognise Brad Cella for his leadership, guidance and constant support.


References


Bureau of Land Management (2006) Alaska large fire history database (AKFIREHIST). Available at http://agdc.usgs.gov/data/blm/fire/index.html [Verified 8 July 2008]

Cocke AE, Fulé PZ , Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 189–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hudak AT, Robichaud PR, Evans JB, Clark J, Lannom K, Morgan P, Stone C (2004) Field validation of Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC) products for post fire assessment. In ‘Remote sensing for field users: proceedings of the 10th Forest Service Remote Sensing Application Conference’, 5–9 April 2004, Salt Lake City, UT. On CD-ROM. (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Bethesda, MD)

Johnson EA (1992) ‘Fire and vegetation dynamics: studies from North American boreal forest.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York)

Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (Eds) (2001) ‘Forest fires behavior and ecological effects.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Johnstone JF , Chapin FS (2006) Effects of soil burn severity on post-fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems  9, 14–31.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kasischke ES, O’Neill KP, French NHF, Bourgeau-Chavez LL (2000) Controls on patterns of biomass burning in Alaskan boreal forest. In ‘Fire, climate change, and carbon cycling in the North American boreal forest’. (Eds ES Kasischke, BJ Stocks) pp. 173–196. (Springer: New York)

Kasischke ES, Williams D , Barry D (2002) Analysis of the patterns of large fires in the boreal forest region of Alaska. International Journal of Wildland Fire  11, 131–144.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kasischke ES, Rupp TS, Verbyla DL (2006) Fire trends in the Alaskan boreal forest. In ‘Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest’. (Eds FS Chapin III, MW Oswood, K Van Cleve, LA Viereck, DL Verbyla) pp. 285–301. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Key CH (2006) Ecological and sampling constraints on defining landscape fire severity. Fire Ecology 2(2), 34–59. Available at http://www.fireecology.net/pdfs/vol2iss2/Key.pdf [Verified 8 July 2008]

Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape Assessment (LA). In ‘FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System’. (Eds DC Lutes, RE Keane, JF Carati, CH Key, NC Benson, LJ Gangi) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountains Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD. p. LA-1–55. (Fort Collins, CO)

Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE , Benson NC (2006) Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire  15, 319–345.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | National Interagency Coordination Center (2007) Fire Information – Wildland Fire Statistics. Available at http://www.nifc.gov/fire_info/lightning_human_fires.html [Verified 8 July 2008]

Racine CH, Johnson LA , Viereck LA (1987) Patterns of vegetation recovery after tundra fires in northwestern Alaska, USA. Arctic and Alpine Research  19, 461–469.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Van Wagner CE (1983) Fire behavior in northern conifer forests and shrublands. In ‘The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems’. (Eds RW Wein, DA MacLean) pp. 65–80. (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR , Key CH (2004) Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment  92, 397–408.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Viereck LA (1983) The effects of fire in a black spruce ecosystem of Alaska and Northern Canada. In ‘The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems’. (Eds RW Wein, DA MacLean) pp. 201–220. (Wiley: Chichester, UK)

Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-286. (Portland, OR)

Wang GG (2002) Fire severity in relation to canopy composition within burned boreal mixedwood stands. Forest Ecology and Management  163, 85–92.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zasada J (1986) Natural regeneration of trees and tall shrubs on forest sites in interior Alaska. In ‘Forest ecosystems in the Alaska taiga: a synthesis of structure and function’. (Eds K Van Cleve, FS Chapin, PW Flanagan, LA Viereck, CT Dyrness) pp. 44–73. (Springer Verlag: New York)

Zhu Z, Key C, Ohlen D, Benson N (2006) Evaluate Sensitivities of Burn-Severity Mapping Algorithms for Different Ecosystems and Fire Histories in the United States: Final Report to the Joint Fire Science Program. Available at http://jfsp.nifc.gov/projects/01-1-4-12/01-1-4-12_Final_Report.pdf [Verified 8 July 2008]