Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does the post‐fire organic layer compress beneath the snowpack?

T. B. Splawinski A D , D. F. Greene A , S. Gauthier B and Y. Bergeron C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montréal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada.

B Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Rue du PEPS, PO Box 10380, Stn Sainte Foy, Québec, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada.

C Centre d’Étude sur la Forêt and Chaire Industrielle en Aménagement Forestier Durable, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888 Succursale A, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.

D Corresponding author. Email: tadeusz007@hotmail.com

International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(5) 673-676 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF09056
Submitted: 2 June 2009  Accepted: 27 November 2009   Published: 9 August 2010

Abstract

It is well known that post‐fire duff layers that are thin or of lower porosity greatly enhance juvenile survivorship of sexually recruiting boreal plant species. Nonetheless, there has been no study on duff compaction by snow following charring. We examined post‐fire duff depth for the first 3 years (two winters) after a 2006 wildfire in the boreal forest of north‐western Quebec. We found that (1) significant compression was common, with (2) a positive relationship between the initial thickness of the burned organic layer depth and the subsequent amount of compression. The proportional compression rate was, however, roughly constant: ∼14% after 2 years regardless of initial post‐fire duff depth. We conclude that this amount of compression is too little to significantly impact post‐fire seedling recruitment.

Additional keywords: fire, germination, seedbeds, sexual recruitment.


Acknowledgements

We thank the Chantiers Chibougamau company for setting aside the Mistissinni plots and the Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune (MRN) and Société de protection contre les incendies de forêts (SOPFEU) for providing information concerning the fire. Funding was provided by an Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Collaborative Research and Development (CRD) Grant with Tembec and Domtar. A. Savoie, A. Sullivan, and T. Gielau assisted in the field.


References


Amiro BD, MacPherson JI, Desjardins RL, Chen JM , Liu J (2003) Post‐fire carbon dioxide fluxes in the western Canadian boreal forest: evidence from towers, aircraft and remote sensing. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology  115, 91–107.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Johnson EA (1992) ‘Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from North American Boreal Forest.’ Cambridge Studies in Ecology. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Johnstone JF , Chapin FS (2006) Effects of soil burn severity on post‐fire tree recruitment in boreal forest. Ecosystems  9, 14–31.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Lutz HJ (1956) Ecological effects of forest fires in the interior of Alaska. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1133.

Miyanishi K (2001) Duff consumption. In ‘Forest Fires: Behaviors and Ecological Effects’. (Eds EA Johnson, K Miyanishi) pp. 437–470. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Miyanishi K , Johnson EA (2002) Process and patterns of duff consumption in the mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  32, 1285–1295.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neary DG, Klopatek CC, DeBano LF , Folliott PF (1999) Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecology and Management  122, 51–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas PA , Wein RW (1985) The influence of shelter and the hypothetical effect of fire severity on the post‐fire establishment of conifers from seed. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  15, 148–155.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |