Building links between town and gown: an innovative organisation in south-eastern Melbourne
Jenny Advocat A C , Grant Russell A and Mary Mathews BA Monash University, School of Primary Health Care, Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia.
B South Eastern Health Providers Association, Waterman Business Centre, 64 Victor Crescent, Narre Warren, Vic. 3805, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: jenny.advocat@monash.edu
Australian Journal of Primary Health 22(2) 71-76 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY14148
Submitted: 9 October 2014 Accepted: 12 July 2015 Published: 9 September 2015
Abstract
Primary care is the foundation of a nation’s health care system. Real world research is a requirement of a health system built to deliver the benefits of a strong primary care community. In the last decade, new approaches to optimising the impact of research on practice and policy have been formulated across disciplines. However, in Australia, the primary care research community remains small and primary care researchers are not well represented in either receiving support for or governing research. While practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have brought GPs and, sometimes, other clinicians together with academics, few have managed to bring local decision makers and other primary health care stakeholders into partnerships where they can work together on common problems. This paper outlines a novel three-way partnership between a health authority, a primary care organisation and a university in the south-eastern suburbs of Melbourne. A case study was undertaken based on author experience of the Southern Academic Primary Care Research Unit (SAPCRU) and semi-structured interviews with representatives from partner organisations. Interviews elicited perceived barriers and facilitators, including complex financial, human resources and governance challenges, associated with bridging the gap between research and practice. It was found that SAPCRU has been successful in engaging with research partners and has begun to develop links with policy makers and orient research themes to the needs of its varied communities. Especially with the introduction of Primary Health Networks (PHNs), the model has the potential to translate to different settings but barriers should be noted.
References
Advocat J, Russell G (2011). Building links between town and gown: a new organisation in South East Melbourne. In ‘2011 Primary Health Care Research Conference: Program & Abstracts’. Available at http://www.phcris.org.au/resources/item.php?id=6966&spindex=3 [verified 6 August 2015]Anderson WP (2011) NHMRC funding for primary care research 2000–2008. The Medical Journal of Australia 195, 583
| NHMRC funding for primary care research 2000–2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22107004PubMed |
Cooke J (2005) A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Family Practice 6, 44
| A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16253133PubMed |
Del Mar C, Askew D (2004) Building family/general practice research capacity. Annals of Family Medicine 2, S35–S40.
| Building family/general practice research capacity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15655086PubMed |
Lee R (2010) Take heart general practice. Australian Family Physician 39, 887
Mant D, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Knottnerus A, Wallace P, van Weel C (2004) The state of primary-care research. Lancet 364, 1004–1006.
| The state of primary-care research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15364194PubMed |
McIntyre EL, Mazza D, Harris NP (2011) NHMRC funding for primary health care research, 2000–2008. The Medical Journal of Australia 195, 230
Pearce KA, Love MM, Barron MA, Matheny SC, Mahfoud Z (2004) How and why to study the practice content of a practice-based research network. Annals of Family Medicine 2, 425–428.
| How and why to study the practice content of a practice-based research network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15506575PubMed |
Russell G, Geneau R, Johnston S, Liddy C, Hogg W (2007). Mapping the future of primary health care research in Canada: a report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Ottawa.
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The Milbank Quarterly 83, 457–502.
| Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16202000PubMed |
van Weel C (2011) The impact of research in primary care and family medicine: the Thomson Reuters Web of Science subject category ‘Primary Health Care’. Family Practice 28, 239–240.
| The impact of research in primary care and family medicine: the Thomson Reuters Web of Science subject category ‘Primary Health Care’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21602287PubMed |
