CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Animal Production Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Print Publication Dates
Sites of Interest
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders

D. J. Pannell A F G, G. R. Marshall B, N. Barr C F, A. Curtis D, F. Vanclay E and R. Wilkinson C F

A School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Department of Primary Industries, Bendigo, Vic. 3554, Australia.
D Faculty of Science and Agriculture, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
E Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
F Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-Based Management of Dryland Salinity, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
G Corresponding author. Email: david.pannell@uwa.edu.au


Abstract

Research on the adoption of rural innovations is reviewed and interpreted through a cross-disciplinary lens to provide practical guidance for research, extension and policy relating to conservation practices. Adoption of innovations by landholders is presented as a dynamic learning process. Adoption depends on a range of personal, social, cultural and economic factors, as well as on characteristics of the innovation itself. Adoption occurs when the landholder perceives that the innovation in question will enhance the achievement of their personal goals. A range of goals is identifiable among landholders, including economic, social and environmental goals. Innovations are more likely to be adopted when they have a high ‘relative advantage’ (perceived superiority to the idea or practice that it supersedes), and when they are readily trialable (easy to test and learn about before adoption). Non-adoption or low adoption of a number of conservation practices is readily explicable in terms of their failure to provide a relative advantage (particularly in economic terms) or a range of difficulties that landholders may have in trialing them.

Keywords: agriculture, economics, extension, innovation, learning, natural resource management, personality, policy, psychology, social issues, sociology, trials.

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(11) 1407–1424    doi:10.1071/EA05037
Submitted: 14 February 2005    Accepted: 9 March 2006    Published: 9 October 2006





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (153 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010