Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in blood parameters and electroencephalogram of cattle as affected by different stunning and slaughter methods in cattle

I. Zulkifli A B E , Y. M. Goh B , B. Norbaiyah A , A. Q. Sazili A , M. Lotfi C , A. F. Soleimani B and A. H. Small D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Halal Products Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

B Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

C AHFS Australian Halal Food Services, Highpoint Business Centre – Unit 26, PO Box 775, Springwood, Qld 4127, Australia.

D CSIRO FD McMaster Research Laboratory, Chiswick, New England Highway, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: zulkifli@agri.upm.edu.my

Animal Production Science 54(2) 187-193 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12128
Submitted: 12 April 2012  Accepted: 24 January 2013   Published: 17 April 2013

Abstract

The present study aimed to provide a comparative analysis of the effects of penetrative stunning, non-penetrative stunning and post-slaughter stunning on biochemical parameters and electroencephalogram (EEG) associated with stress in heifers and steers. Ten animals were assigned to each of the following four treatment groups: (1) animals were subjected to conventional halal slaughter (a clean incision through the structures on the ventral neck at the approximate level of vertebrae C2–C3 – the trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries and jugular veins) and post-cut penetrating mechanical stun within 10–20 s of the halal cut (U); (2) high-power non-penetrating mechanical stunning using a mushroom-headed humane killer, followed by conventional halal slaughter (HPNP); (3) low-power non-penetrating mechanical percussive stunning using a mushroom-headed humane killer, followed by conventional halal slaughter (LPNP); and (4) penetrative stunning using a captive-bolt pistol humane killer, followed by conventional halal slaughter (P). For each animal, blood samples and electroencephalogram recordings were taken before stunning, post-stunning (if applicable) and post-slaughter, and plasma concentrations of cortisol, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), adrenaline, noradrenaline and β-endorphin were determined. Irrespective of the stunning method, except for percentage change in plasma concentrations of noradrenaline, the values of blood parameters attained before and after stunning were not significantly different. The plasma noradrenaline concentration of the HPNP animals was significantly elevated following stunning. Following slaughter, the percentage change of plasma ACTH concentration in the P animals was significantly elevated. Neither stunning method nor sampling time had a significant effect on plasma β-endorphin concentration. On the basis of the EEG results, penetrative stunning seemed to be better in maximising the possibility of post-stunning insensibility, whereas U animals appeared to demonstrate an evident increase in EEG activity which is consistent with the presence of post-slaughter noxious stimuli associated with tissue cut and injury. The U animals had consistently higher, if not the highest, RMS values than did other stunned animals. This indicates a degree of EEG changes associated with stress and pain. On the basis of EEG data, our results suggested that penetrative stunning would be the most reliable method of ensuring insensibility and minimising pain. However, at slaughter, the P animals showed a dramatic elevation in the percentage change of circulating ACTH, suggesting physiological stress response. On a cautionary note, the results are not unequivocal, and it may be that the range of analyses available to researchers at this point of time are not sufficiently specific to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.


References

Anil MH, Fordham DP, Rodway RG (1990) Plasma β-endorphin increase following electrical stunning in sheep. The British Veterinary Journal 146, 476–477.
Plasma β-endorphin increase following electrical stunning in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FivVKrsw%3D%3D&md5=eb9c939338aa49cae7895028d28e63c4CAS | 2224492PubMed |

Blackmore DK, Newhook JC (1982) Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves – Part 3: the duration of insensibility induced by electrical stunning in sheep and calves. Meat Science 7, 19–28.
Electroencephalographic studies of stunning and slaughter of sheep and calves – Part 3: the duration of insensibility induced by electrical stunning in sheep and calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbmvVyltA%3D%3D&md5=f9d0b2df7e33856265f08845a75b499bCAS | 22055065PubMed |

Broom DM, Johnson KG (1993) ‘Stress and animal welfare.’ (Chapman and Hall: London)

Devine CE, Gilbert KV, Graafhuis AE, Tavener A, Reed H, Leigh P (1986) The effect of electrical stunning and slaughter on the electroencephalogram of sheep and calves. Meat Science 17, 267–281.
The effect of electrical stunning and slaughter on the electroencephalogram of sheep and calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbmvFSntQ%3D%3D&md5=18ebea66285985cd1843b1b66b0ff29dCAS | 22055358PubMed |

Finnie JW (1995) Neuropathological changes produced by non-penetrating percussive captive bolt stunning of cattle. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43, 183–185.
Neuropathological changes produced by non-penetrating percussive captive bolt stunning of cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzntlOltg%3D%3D&md5=ab6d0a7e758b2a8c31fedd8ff1411bfeCAS | 16031846PubMed |

Finnie JW, Blumberg PC, Manavis J, Summersides GE, Davies RA (2000) Evaluation of brain damage resulting from penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolt stunning using lambs. Australian Veterinary Journal 78, 775–778.
Evaluation of brain damage resulting from penetrating and non-penetrating captive bolt stunning using lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ks1OgsQ%3D%3D&md5=bcaf5cdb6af9f055871aeeec4d65d918CAS | 11194725PubMed |

Gibson TJ, Johnson CB, Murrell JC, Hulls CM, Mitchinson SL, Stafford KJ, Johnstone AC, Mellor DJ (2009a) Electroencephalographic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57, 77–83.
Electroencephalographic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntlOmsA%3D%3D&md5=6a00162d1462412355c92681213f0177CAS | 19471325PubMed |

Gibson TJ, Johnson CB, Murrell JC, Stafford KJ, Chambers PJ, Mellor DJ (2009b) Components of electroencephalographic responses to slaughter in halothane-anaesthetised calves: effects of cutting neck tissues compared with major blood vessels. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57, 84–89.
Components of electroencephalographic responses to slaughter in halothane-anaesthetised calves: effects of cutting neck tissues compared with major blood vessels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntlOmsQ%3D%3D&md5=599e8408867a091b439df8350b457877CAS | 19471326PubMed |

Gibson TJ, Johnson CB, Murrell JC, Mitchinson SL, Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ (2009c) Electroencephalographic response to concussive non-penetrating captive-bolt stunning in halothane-anaesthetised calves. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57, 90–95.
Electroencephalographic response to concussive non-penetrating captive-bolt stunning in halothane-anaesthetised calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntlOmtg%3D%3D&md5=a981e0bd2ea6fa2b88d3b42cfce7ccf4CAS | 19471327PubMed |

Gibson TJ, Johnson CB, Murrell JC, Mitchinson SL, Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ (2009d) Amelioration of electroencephalographic responses to slaughter by non-penetrative captive-bolt stunning after ventral neck incision in halothane-anaesthetised calves. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57, 96–101.
Amelioration of electroencephalographic responses to slaughter by non-penetrative captive-bolt stunning after ventral neck incision in halothane-anaesthetised calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzntlOmtw%3D%3D&md5=c07639db980adaaac52d9bdee1ecf028CAS | 19471328PubMed |

Grandin T (1996) Factors that impede animal movement at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 209, 757–759.

Grandin T (2009) ‘Recommended captive bolt stunning techniques for cattle.’ Available at http://www.grandin.com/humane/cap.bolt.tips.html [verified 26 March 2013].

Grandin T, Smith GC (2004) ‘Animal welfare and humane slaughter.’ (Colorado State University: Fort Collins, CO). Available at http://www.grandin.com/references/humane.slaughter.html [verified 26 March 2013].

Gregory NG (2007) ‘Animal welfare and meat production.’ 2nd edn. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)

Gregory NG, Shaw F (2000) Penetrating captive bolt stunning and exsanguinations of cattle in abattoirs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 3, 215–230.
Penetrating captive bolt stunning and exsanguinations of cattle in abattoirs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gregory NG, Fielding HR, Von Wenzlawowicz M, Von Holleben K (2010) Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle. Meat Science 85, 66–69.
Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3ks1agtA%3D%3D&md5=d09aad38f6cdba912e4468c0b7dbf100CAS | 20374866PubMed |

Hemsworth PH, Mellor DJ, Johnson CB (2009) A scientific comment on the welfare of sheep slaughtered without stunning. Available at http://www.daff.gov.au/animal-plant-health/welfare/aaws/a_scientific_comment_on_the_welfare_of_sheep_slaughtered_without_stunning [verified 26 March 2013].

Johnson CB, Gibson TJ, Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ (2012) Pain perception at slaughter. Animal Welfare 21, 113–122.
Pain perception at slaughter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XotVymtLk%3D&md5=c17106c6f85f97021adf4682b504c860CAS |

Lacroix A, Hontela A (2006) Role of calcium channels in cadmium-induced disruption of cortisol synthesis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 144, 141–147.
Role of calcium channels in cadmium-induced disruption of cortisol synthesis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16959544PubMed |

Lambooy E, Spanjaard W (1981) Effect of the shooting position on the stunning of calves by captive bolt. Veterinary Record 109, 359–361.
Effect of the shooting position on the stunning of calves by captive bolt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL387gvFSmsg%3D%3D&md5=41c88177e80846c2aaf4ae500829e1c7CAS | 7324352PubMed |

Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, Todd SE, Lowe TE, Gregory NG, Bruce RA, Ward M (2002) A comparison of catecholamine and cortisol responses of young lambs and calves to painful husbandry procedures. Australian Veterinary Journal 80, 228–233.
A comparison of catecholamine and cortisol responses of young lambs and calves to painful husbandry procedures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XltlOrsbc%3D&md5=2741927414af683256f1994bb2db1247CAS | 12054287PubMed |

Mellor DJ, Gibson TJ, Johnson CB (2009) A re-evaluation of the need to stun calves prior to slaughter by ventral-neck incision: an introductory review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57, 74–76.
A re-evaluation of the need to stun calves prior to slaughter by ventral-neck incision: an introductory review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mznt1Srsw%3D%3D&md5=b6af6e825cf6e8b84ab4c4d2e9611891CAS | 19471324PubMed |

Micera E, Albrizio M, Surdo NC, Moramarco AM, Zarrilli A (2010a) Stress-related hormones in horses before and after stunning by captive bolt gun. Meat Science 84, 634–637.
Stress-related hormones in horses before and after stunning by captive bolt gun.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXit1ajsLo%3D&md5=93c01a7f215dd2187e36477ea2fbca2fCAS | 20374835PubMed |

Micera E, Dimatteo S, Grimaldi M, Marsico G, Zarrilli A (2010b) Stress indicators in steers at slaughtering. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6, 457–459.
Stress indicators in steers at slaughtering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Murrell JC, Johnson CB (2006) Neurophysiological techniques to assess pain in animals. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29, 325–335.
Neurophysiological techniques to assess pain in animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rjsFCjtw%3D%3D&md5=d91c042127bde8a1370279167f28dd62CAS | 16958776PubMed |

Nowak B, Mueffling TV, Hartung J (2007) Effect of different carbon dioxide concentrations and exposure times in stunning of slaughter pigs: impact on animal welfare and meat quality. Meat Science 75, 290–298.
Effect of different carbon dioxide concentrations and exposure times in stunning of slaughter pigs: impact on animal welfare and meat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFerurbF&md5=16b8e84a3e4703915d58a203e1f5dc8aCAS | 22063661PubMed |

Ong RM, Morris JP, O’Dwyer JK, Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH, Clarke IJ (1997) Behavioural and EEG changes in sheep in response to painful acute electrical stimuli. Australian Veterinary Journal 75, 189–193.
Behavioural and EEG changes in sheep in response to painful acute electrical stimuli.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ktlKluw%3D%3D&md5=35d5289f22342b890f935af4d0247b38CAS | 9088510PubMed |

Sapolsky RM (1992) ‘Stress, the aging brain, and the mechanisms of neuron death.’ (The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA)

SAS Institute (2003) ‘SAS/STAT user’s guide. Release 9.1.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)

Shaw NA (2002) The neurophysiology of concussion. Progress in Neurobiology 67, 281–344.
The neurophysiology of concussion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xms1KisbY%3D&md5=c5db6735dd8e33e35c97e69890a5c995CAS | 12207973PubMed |

Shaw FD, Tume RK (1992) The assessment of pre-slaughter and slaughter treatments of livestock by measurement of plasma constituents – A review of recent work. Meat Science 32, 311–329.
The assessment of pre-slaughter and slaughter treatments of livestock by measurement of plasma constituents – A review of recent work.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK38XltVylsrk%3D&md5=ca52108db38a24330fe902b7f1e29750CAS | 22059818PubMed |

Warriss P (2010) ‘Meat science.’ 2nd edn. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)

Zulkifli I, Siegel PB (1995) Is there a positive a positive side to stress? World’s Poultry Science Journal 51, 63–76.
Is there a positive a positive side to stress?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |