Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Solute accumulation and osmotic adjustment in leaves of Brassica oilseeds in response to soil water deficit

Qifu Ma A , David W. Turner A C , David Levy B and Wallace A. Cowling A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B Institute of Field and Garden Crops, Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organisation, Bet-Dagan 50250, Israel.

C Corresponding author; email: David.Turner@uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(9) 939-945 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03183
Submitted: 3 September 2003  Accepted: 21 July 2004   Published: 24 September 2004

Abstract

To establish methods for improving drought tolerance in Brassica oilseeds, we examined the influence of soil water deficit on solute accumulation in expanded and expanding leaves. We assessed the contribution of individual solutes to osmotic adjustment (OA) and determined the effect of homozygosity on the variation of the expression of OA. Juvenile plants of canola (Brassica napus cvv. Karoo and Monty) and Indian mustard (B. juncea line PI-81792) were grown under glasshouse conditions. The 3 genotypes expressed similar magnitudes of OA in response to drought, compared with a 2-fold higher OA in expanding leaves than in fully expanded leaves. Drought-induced changes in OA of expanded leaves of all genotypes were largely due to the accumulation of nitrate (42−47%), soluble sugars (31−38%), and proline (11−14%). In expanding leaves, K+ accumulation was significant (23–27%) as was proline (17−22%), whereas nitrate and soluble sugars were less important than in expanded leaves. By comparison, ions of Na+, Cl, and water-soluble Mg2+ and Ca2+ did not contribute significantly to OA. Proline was hardly detected in well watered plants, but sharply increased in leaves of droughted plants in direct proportion to the magnitude of OA (80 ± 7 mmol/MPa, r2 = 0.94). A comparison between doubled haploid (DH) and commercial seed sources of 2 B. napus cultivars showed similar mean values in OA. The DH lines had a 33% lower coefficient of variation in OA than cv. Karoo and 48% lower than cv. Monty among replicate plants.

Proline may be a suitable ‘marker’ for OA in juvenile Brassica plants because of all the solutes measured, its concentration was directly proportional to the magnitude of OA across cultivars and leaf types. The use of DH lines will improve the precision in selection of genotypes that have the capacity to osmotically adjust under soil water deficit.

Additional keywords: canola, doubled haploid, drought, expanding and expanded leaves.


Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Tim Colmer for access to laboratory equipment. This project was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia. Seeds of doubled haploid lines from Monty and Karoo were kindly provided by Canola Breeders Western Australia Pty Ltd. We thank the referees for helpful comments.


References


Arndt SK, Wanek W, Clifford SC, Popp M (2000) Contrasting adaptations to drought stress in field-grown Ziziphus mauritiana and Prunus persica trees: water relations, osmotic adjustment and carbon isotope composition. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 985–996.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Buzza GC (1995) Plant Breeding. ‘Brassica oilseeds, production and utilization’. (Eds D Kimber, DI McGregor) pp. 153–175. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Chang, R (1981). ‘Physical chemistry with applications to biological systems.’ 2nd edn . (Macmillan Publishing: New York)

Escobar-Gutierrez AJ, Zipperlin B, Carbonne F, Moing A, Gaudillere JP (1998) Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and metabolite content during drought stress in peach seedlings. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 197–205. open url image1

Jones MM, Osmond CB, Turner NC (1980) Accumulation of solutes in leaves of sorghum and sunflower in response to water deficits. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7, 193–205. open url image1

Kameli A, Lösel DM (1995) Contribution of carbohydrates and other solutes to osmotic adjustment in wheat leaves under water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 145, 363–366. open url image1

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Tennant D, Thomson BD, Siddique KHM (1998) Water relations, gas exchange and growth of cool-season grain legumes in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 295–303.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Marschner, H (1995). ‘Mineral nutrition of higher plants.’ 2nd edn . (Academic Press: London)

Mengel, K ,  and  Kirkby, EA (1979). ‘Principles of plant nutrition.’ 2nd edn . (International Potash Institute: Bern, Switzerland)

Milthorpe, FL ,  and  Moorby, J (1979). ‘An introduction to crop physiology.’ 2nd edn . (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Morgan JM (1984) Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35, 299–319.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JM (1991) A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18, 249–257. open url image1

Morgan JM (1992) Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19, 67–76. open url image1

Morgan JM, Hare RA, Fletcher RJ (1986) Genetic variation in osmoregulation in bread and durum wheats and its relationship to grain yield in a range of field environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 449–457.
Crossref |
open url image1

Morgan JM, Tan MK (1996) Chromosomal location of a wheat osmoregulation gene using RFLP analysis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 803–806. open url image1

Munns R, Brady CJ, Barlow EWR (1979) Solute accumulation in the apex and leaves of wheat during water stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 6, 379–389. open url image1

Naidu BP (1998) Separation of sugars, polyols, proline analogues and betaines in stressed plant extracts by high performance liquid chromatography and quantification by ultra violet detection. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 793–800.
Crossref |
open url image1

Niknam SR, Ma Q, Turner DW (2003) Osmotic adjustment and seed yield of Brassica napus and B. juncea genotypes in a water-limited environment in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1127–1135.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Patakas A, Nikolaou N, Zioziou E, Radoglou K, Noitsakis B (2002) The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Science 163, 361–367.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pate JS, Emery RJN, Atkins CA (1998) Transport physiology and partitioning. ‘Lupins as crop plants: biology, production and utilization’. (Eds JS Gladstones, CA Atkins, J Hamblin) pp. 181–226. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Sivaramakrishnan S, Patell VZ, Flower DJ, Peacock JM (1988) Proline accumulation and nitrate reductase activity in contrasting sorghum lines during mild-season drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum 74, 418–426. open url image1

Turner NC, Jones MM (1980) Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation. ‘Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress’. (Eds NC Turner, PJ Kramer, J Hamblin) pp. 87–103. (John Wiley & Sons: London)

Wang Z, Stutte GW (1992) The role of carbohydrates in active osmotic adjustment in apple under water stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117, 816–823. open url image1

Wright PR, Morgan JM, Jessop RS (1996) Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: plant water relations and growth. Field Crops Research 49, 51–64.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wright PR, Morgan JM, Jessop RS (1997) Turgor maintenance by osmoregulation in Brassica napus and B. juncea under field conditions. Annals of Botany 80, 313–319.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wright PR, Morgan JM, Jessop RS, Cass A (1995) Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: yield and yield components. Field Crops Research 42, 1–13.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. The Biochemical Journal 57, 508–514.
PubMed |
open url image1