Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Lupin: the largest grain legume crop in Western Australia, its adaptation and improvement through plant breeding

Robert J. French A C D and Bevan J. Buirchell B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Dryland Research Institute, PO Box 432, Merredin, WA 6415, Australia.

B Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Locked Bag 4, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia.

C Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: bfrench@agric.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(11) 1169-1180 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05088
Submitted: 9 March 2005  Accepted: 21 September 2005   Published: 29 November 2005

Abstract

Between 500 000 and 1 000 000 tonnes of narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) are produced in Western Australia each year. It has become the predominant grain legume in Western Australian agriculture because it is peculiarly well adapted to acid sandy soils and the Mediterranean climate of south-western Australia. It has a deep root system and root growth is not reduced in mildly acid soils, which allows it to fully exploit the water and nutrients in the deep acid sandplain soils that cover much of the agricultural areas of Western Australia. It copes with seasonal drought through drought escape and dehydration postponement. Drought escape is lupin’s main adaptation to drought, and has been strengthened by plant breeders over the past 40 years by removal of the vernalisation requirement for flowering, and further selection for earlier flowering and maturity. Lupin postpones dehydration by several mechanisms. Its deep root system allows it to draw on water from deep in the soil profile. Lupin stomata close to reduce crop water demand at a higher leaf water potential than wheat, but photosynthetic rates are higher when well watered. It has been proposed that stomata close in response to roots sensing receding soil moisture, possibly at a critical water potential at the root surface. This is an adaptation to sandy soils, which hold a greater proportion of their water at high matric potentials than loamy or clayey soils, since the crop needs to moderate its water use while there is still sufficient soil water left to complete its life cycle. Lupin has limited capacity for osmotic adjustment, and does not tolerate dehydration as well as other crops such as wheat or chickpea. Plant breeding has increased the yield potential of lupin in the main lupin growing areas of Western Australia by 2–3 fold since the first adapted cultivar was released in 1967. This has been due largely to selecting earlier flowering and maturing cultivars, but also to improved pod set and retention, resistance to Phomopsis leptostromiformis (Kühn) Bubák, and more rapid seed filling. We propose a model for reproductive development in lupin where vegetative growth is terminated in response to receding soil moisture and followed by a period in which all assimilate is devoted to seed filling. This should allow lupin to adjust its developmental pattern in response to seasonal conditions to something like the optimum that mathematical optimal control theory would choose for that season. This is the type of pattern that has evolved in lupin, and the task of future plant breeders will be to fine-tune it to better suit the environment in the lupin growing areas of Western Australia.

Additional keywords: dehydration postponement, drought escape, osmotic adjustment, root systems.


Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the organisers of the symposium ‘Adaptation of plants to water-limited Mediterranean-type environments’ for providing us with the stimulus to prepare this review, and the Grains Research and Development Corporation for financial support.  Dr Katia Stefanova conducted the statistical analysis of the data presented in Figure 4.


References


Amir S, Cohen D (1990) Optimal reproductive efforts and the timing of reproduction of annual plants in randomly varying environments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 147, 17–42. open url image1

Anderson GC, Fillery IRP, Dunin FX, Dolling PJ, Asseng S (1998) Nitrogen and water flows under pasture–wheat and lupin–wheat rotations in deep sands in Western Australia. 2. Drainage and nitrate leaching. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 345–361.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Anderson WK, Garlinge JR (2000) The wheat book: principles and practice. Agriculture Western Australia, Bulletin 4443, South Perth.

Cohen D (1971) Maximising final yield when growth is limited by time or limiting resources. Journal of Theoretical Biology 33, 299–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Cohen D (1976) The optimal timing of reproduction. American Naturalist 117, 993–997. open url image1

Dracup M (1994) Physiological aspects to lupin improvement for water-limited Mediterranean environments. ‘Proceedings of the 1st Australian Lupin Technical Symposium’. (Department of Agriculture: South Perth, W. Aust.)


Dracup M, Belford RK, Gregory PJ (1992) Constraints to root growth of wheat and lupin crops in duplex soils. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 947–961.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup, M ,  and  Kirby, EJM (1996a). ‘Lupin development guide.’ a. (UWA Press: Perth, W. Aust.)

Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1996b) Pod and seed growth and development of narrow-leafed lupin in a water limited Mediterranean-type environment. Field Crops Research 48, 209–222.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup M, Reader MA, Palta JA (1998a) Variation in yield of narrow-leafed lupin caused by terminal drought. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 799–810.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup M, Thomson B (2000) Narrow-leafed lupins with restricted branching. Annals of Botany 85, 29–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup M, Thomson B, Reader M, Kirby EJM, Shield I, Leach J (1998b) Daylength responses, flowering time, and seed filling in lupins. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1047–1055.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dracup M, Turner NC, Tang C, Reader M, Palta J (1998) Responses to abiotic stresses. ‘Lupins as crop plants – biology, production and utilization’. (Eds JS Gladstones, C Atkins, J Hamblin) pp. 227–262. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Eastham J, Gregory PJ (2000) The influence of crop management on the water balance of lupin and wheat on a layered soil in a Mediterranean environment. Plant and Soil 221, 239–251.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Eastham J, Gregory PJ, Williamson DR, Watson GD (1999) The influence of early sowing of wheat and lupin crops on evapotranspiration and evaporation from the soil surface in a Mediterranean climate. Agricultural Water Management 42, 205–218.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Evans, LT (1993). ‘Crop evolution, adaptation and yield.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Farré I, Robertson MJ, Asseng S, French RJ, Dracup M (2004) Simulating lupin development, growth, and yield in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 863–877.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

French RJ (2002) Soil factors influencing growth and yield of narrow-leafed lupin and field pea in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 217–225.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

French RJ, D’Antuono M (2003) Matching lupin cultivar to environment in Western Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Vic.. (Australian Society of Agronomy Melbourne,)
http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/c/4/french.htm

French RJ, Ewing MA (1989) Soil type influences the relative yields of different cereals and crop legumes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 829–835.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

French RJ, Turner NC (1991) Water deficits change dry matter partitioning and seed yield in narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 471–484.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Galwey NW, Adhikari K, Dracup M, Thomson R (2003) Agronomic potential of genetically diverse narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) with restricted branching. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 649–661.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gallardo M, Eastham J, Gregory PJ, Turner NC (1996) A comparison of plant hydraulic conductances in wheat and lupins. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 233–239. open url image1

Gallardo M, Turner NC, Ludwig C (1994) Water relations, gas exchange and abscisic acid content of Lupinus cosentinii leaves in response to drying different proportions of the root system. Journal of Experimental Botany 45, 909–918. open url image1

Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics 2, 269–273. open url image1

Gilmour, AR , Gogel, BJ , Cullis, BR , Welham, SJ ,  and  Thompson, R (2002). ‘ASReml user guide. Release 1.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: UK)

Gladstones J (1989) Breeding Phomopsis-resistant lupins. Journal of Agriculture, Western Australia 30, 3–7. open url image1

Gladstones JS (1994) An historical review of lupins in Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the first Australian Lupin Technical Symposium’. (Department of Agriculture: South Perth, W. Aust.)


Gregory PJ, Eastham J (1996) Growth of shoots and roots, and interception of radiation by wheat and lupin crops on a shallow duplex soil in response to time of sowing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 427–447.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hamblin AP, Hamblin J (1985) Root characteristics of some temperate legume species and varieties on deep, free-draining entisols. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 63–72.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hamblin AP, Richards Q, Blake J (1988) Crop growth across a toposequence controlled by depth of sand over clay. Australian Journal of Soil Research 26, 623–635.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hamblin AP, Tennant D (1987) Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: how well are they correlated? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 513–527.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hamblin J, Delane R, Bishop A, Gladstones J (1986) Yield potential of reduced-branching lupins (Lupinus angustifolius) on sandy soils in a short-season environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 611–620.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Henson IE, Jensen CR, Turner NC (1989a) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of lupins and wheat. I. Shoot responses to soil water deficits. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 401–413. open url image1

Henson IE, Jensen CR, Turner NC (1989b) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of lupins and wheat. III. Abscisic acid and drought-induced stomatal closure. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 429–442. open url image1

Jensen CR, Hensen IE, Turner NC (1989) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of lupins and wheat. II. Root and shoot water relations of lupin during drought-induced stomatal closure. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 415–428. open url image1

Jensen CR, Mogensen VO, Poulsen H-H, Henson IE, Aagot S, Hanson E, Ali M, Wollenweber B (1998) Soil water matric potential rather than water content determines drought responses in field grown lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 353–363. open url image1

Jessop RS, Roth G, Sale P (1990) Effects of increased levels of soil CaCO3 on lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) growth and nutrition. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28, 955–962.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

King D, Roughgarden J (1982) Graded allocation between vegetative and reproductive growth for annual plants in growing seasons of random length. Theoretical Population Biology 22, 1–16.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ, Robinson S (1993) Tactical responses to seasonal conditions in whole-farm planning in Western Australia. Agricultural Economics 8, 211–226.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kozlowski J, Ziólko M (1988) Gradual transition from vegetative to reproductive growth is optimal when the maximum rate of reproductive growth is limited. Theoretical Population Biology 34, 118–129.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Landers KF (1995) Vernalization responses in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1011–1025.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Barr MD, Duda R, Davies SL, Tennant D, Siddique KHM (1999) Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 11, 279–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Tennant D, Thomson BD, Siddique KHM (1998) Water relations, gas exchange and growth of cool-season grain legumes in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 295–303.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Moore G (2001) Soilguide. A handbook for understanding and managing agricultural soils.4343, South Perth.

Palta JA, Ludwig C (1996) Pod set and seed yield as affected by cytokinin application and terminal drought in narrow-leafed lupin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 81–90.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Palta JA, Ludwig C (1997) Yield response of narrow-leafed lupin plants to variation in pod number. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 63–68.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Palta JA, Turner NC, French RJ (2004) The yield performance of lupin genotypes under terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 449–459.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Palta JA, Turner NC, French RJ, Buirchell BJ (2003) Towards the improvement of drought resistance in lupin – a crop for acid sandy soils. ‘Water-saving agriculture and sustainable use of water and land resources’. (Eds S Kang, B Davies, L Shan, H Cai) pp. 93–102. (Shaanxi Science and Technology Press: Yangling, Shaanxi, China)

Palta JA, Turner NC, French RJ, Buirchell BJ (2001) Terminal drought and seed yield of lupin. ‘Proceedings of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Hobart, Tas. (Australian Society of Agronomy: Melbourne, Vic.)


Paltridge GW, Denholm JV, Connor DJ (1984) Determinism, senescence and the yield of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110, 383–398. open url image1

Pate JS, Farrington P (1981) Fruit set in Lupinus angustifolius cv. Unicrop. II. Assimilate flow during flowering and early fruiting. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 8, 307–318. open url image1

Pate JS, Sharkey PJ, Atkins CA (1977) Nutrition of a developing legume fruit – functional economy in terms of carbon, nitrogen and water. Plant Physiology 59, 506–510. open url image1

Perry MW (1975) Field environment studies on lupins. II. The effects of time of planting on dry matter partition and yield components of Lupinus angustifolius L. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 809–818.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Perry MW, Dracup M, Nelson P, Jarvis R, Rowland I, French RJ (1998) Agronomy and farming systems. ‘Lupins as crop plants – biology, production and utilization’. (Eds JS Gladstones, C Atkins, J Hamblin) pp. 291–338. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Perry M, Garlinge J, Landers K, Marcellos H, Mock I, Walker B, Hawthorne W (1994) Estimates of the potential size and distribution of production of narrow-leafed lupin in Australia. ‘Proceedings of the 1st Australian Lupin Technical Symposium’. (Department of Agriculture: South Perth, W. Aust.)


Perry MW, Poole ML (1975) Field environment studies on lupins. I. Developmental patterns in Lupinus angustifolius L., the effects of cultivar, site and planting time. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 81–91.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pigeaire A, Seymour M, Delane R, Atkins CA (1992) Partitioning of dry matter into primary branches and pod initiation on the main inflorescence of Lupinus angustifolius. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 685–696.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rahman MS, Gladstones JS (1974) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering and yield components of lupin genotypes in the field. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 14, 205–213.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Reader MA, Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1995) Time to flowering in narrow-leafed lupin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1063–1077.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schoknecht N (2002) Soil groups of Western Australia: A simple guide to the main soils of Western Australia. Department of Agriculture, Resource Management Technical Report 246, South Perth.

Siddique KHM, Walton GH, Seymour M (1993) A comparison of seed yields of winter grain legumes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 915–922.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Siddique KHM, Tennant D, Perry MW, Belford RK (1990) Water use and water use efficiency of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 431–447.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Smith A, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2001) Analysing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trends. Biometrics 57, 1138–1147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tang C, Longnecker NE, Thomson CJ, Greenway H, Robson AD (1992) Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots differ in their sensitivity to pH above 6.0. Journal of Plant Physiology 140, 715–719. open url image1

Tang C, Robson AD (1995) Nodulation failure is important in the poor growth of two lupin species on an alkaline soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 87–91.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tang C, Thomson BD (1996) Effects of solution pH and bicarbonate on the growth and nodulation of a range of grain legume species. Plant and Soil 186, 321–330. open url image1

Thomson BD, Siddique KHM, Barr MD, Wilson JM (1997) Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments. I. Phenology and seed yield. Field Crops Research 54, 173–187.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Turner NC, Stern WR, Evans P (1987) Water relations and osmotic adjustment of leaves and roots of lupins in response to water deficits. Crop Science 27, 977–983. open url image1

Turner NC (1986) Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 175–190. open url image1

Turner NC, Henson IE (1989) Comparative water relations and gas exchange of wheat and lupins in the field. ‘Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses’. (Eds KH Kreeb, H Richter, TM Hinckley) pp. 293–304. (SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague)

Turner NC, Wright GC, Siddique KHM (2001) Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 71, 193–231. open url image1

White PF (1990) Soil and plant factors relating to the poor growth of Lupinus species on fine-textured alkaline soils – a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 871–890.
Crossref |
open url image1