Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative studies on reproductive structures in four amphicarpic tropical Phaseoleae legumes

P. Saravana Kumar A , R. J. Lawn B D and L. M. Bielig C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia; and CSIRO Plant Industry, ATSIP, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

C Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: robert.lawn@jcu.edu.au; bob.lawn@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 63(6) 570-581 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12213
Submitted: 30 May 2012  Accepted: 2 August 2012   Published: 12 September 2012

Abstract

Amphicarpy, an adaptive trait whereby both aerial and underground fruits are formed on the one plant, occurs in several plant taxa, notably the Phaseoleae legumes. Amphicarpic species offer the dual potential benefits of enhanced persistence through their underground seed, combined with ease of harvest of their aerial seed. While amphicarpy has been reported in several endemic Australian tropical legumes, information on the trait is sparse. The objective of the current research was to compare aerial and underground reproductive structures in amphicarpic tropical legumes from four different sub-tribes within the Phaseoleae: three Australian endemic species, Vigna lanceolata (sub-tribe Phaseolinae), Flemingia pauciflora (sub-tribe Cajaninae), and Glycine falcata (sub-tribe Glycininae); and the exotic pasture legume Centrosema rotundifolium (sub-tribe Clitoriinae). As far as we know, this report of amphicarpy in F. pauciflora is the first record of the trait in a member of the Cajaninae. Descriptions, drawings, and photographs of the morphology and anatomy of the aerial and underground fruiting structures were documented. In general, the aerial flowers in all genotypes studied were chasmogamous, allowing at least some opportunity for outcrossing. In contrast, the underground flowers were invariably much reduced, with a small, non-pigmented corolla enclosed in much-reduced, scale-like sepals. Nonetheless, anthers and viable pollen were observed in the underground flowers in all four species. With the exception of C. rotundifolium, the underground fruiting structures formed on rhizomes which initially arose either from the underground cotyledonary nodes or, in the case of G. falcata, which is epigeal, from the junction of the stem and taproot. The rhizomes gave rise to ramets when they emerged at the surface or from holes in pot bases. The V. lanceolata accessions also produced fleshy tubers which gave rise to rhizomes, especially in subsequent years. In C. rotundifolium, the geocarpic structures arose on specialised, fleshy, geotropic stems that grew down from the stoloniferous stems. In all species, the number of seeds per underground pod was fewer than in the aerial pods, and the underground seeds were invariably larger, although the extent differed between legume genotypes. There was no evidence of effects on growth or development depending on whether plants were grown from aerial or underground seeds. Some of the adaptive and agronomic implications of the key findings are discussed. In particular, it is argued that amphicarpy in the Australian species is an adaptation to seed predation, and to spatially heterogeneous inland soils.

Additional keywords: adaptation, Centrosema rotundifolium, Fleminga pauciflora, geocarpy, Glycine falcata, Vigna lanceolata.


References

Byth DE, Clements RJ, Syme JR (1980) Genetic exploitation of the environment—field crops and pastures. In ‘Pathways to Productivity – Proceedings of the First Australian Agronomy Conference’. Lawes, Qld. pp. 71–84. Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/1980/invited/genetic-exploitation/byth.htm

Cheplick GP (1987) The ecology of amphicarpic plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2, 97–101.
The ecology of amphicarpic plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7gvFGmsg%3D%3D&md5=75b8fdca637bf1a6f7750937517d16e5CAS |

Clements RJ, Hayward MD, Byth DE (1983) Genetic adaptation in pasture plants. In ‘Genetic resources of forage plants’. (Eds JG McIvor, RA Bray) pp. 101–115. (CSIRO: Melbourne)

Clements RJ, Williams RJ (1980) Genetic diversity in Centrosema. In ‘Advances in legume science’. (Eds RJ Summerfield, AH Bunting) pp. 559–567. (Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew, UK)

Cocks PS (1999) Reproductive strategies and genetic structure of wild and naturalised legume populations. Ch. 2. In ‘Genetic resources of Mediterranean pasture and forage legumes’. (Eds SJ Bennett, PS Cocks) pp. 20–28. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Cook BG, Pengelly BC, Brown SD, Donnelly JL, Eagles DA, Franco MA, Hanson J, Mullen BF, Partridge IJ, Peters M, Schultze-Kraft R (2005) Factsheet: Arachis pintoi. In ‘Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool’. [CD-ROM] (CSIRO, DPI&F(Qld), CIAT and ILRI: Brisbane) Available at: www.tropicalforages.info/key/Forages/Media/Html/Arachis_pintoi.htm

Damayanti F, Lawn RJ, Bielig LM (2010) Genotypic variation in domesticated and wild accessions of the tropical tuberous legume Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 771–784.
Genotypic variation in domesticated and wild accessions of the tropical tuberous legume Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Donald CM, Hamblin J (1983) The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 36, 97–143.
The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Everist SL (1951) Notes on some plants of Western Queensland. Queensland Naturalist 14, 52–55.

Gardiner GJ (1999) Centrosema rotundifolium: an amphicarpic legume. In ‘International Rangeland Congress’. Poster paper, Townsville, Australia, July 1999.

Gopinathan MC, Babu CR (1987) Breeding systems and pollination in Vigna minima (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 156, 117–126.
Breeding systems and pollination in Vigna minima (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

James AT, Lawn RJ (1991) Inheritance of selected traits in accessions of Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. of Australian and African origin. Australian Journal of Botany 39, 415–429.
Inheritance of selected traits in accessions of Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. of Australian and African origin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karuniawan A, Lawn RJ (2007) Comparative study of indigenous Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. accessions from different latitudes in Indonesia and Australia. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 150, 30–34.

Kaul V, Koul AK, Sharma MC (2000) The underground flower. Current Science 78, 39–44.

Lawn RJ (1979) Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south-eastern Queensland. II. Vegetative and reproductive response of cultivars to sowing date. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 871–882.
Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south-eastern Queensland. II. Vegetative and reproductive response of cultivars to sowing date.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Cottrell A (1988) Wild mungbean and its relatives in Australia. Biologist 35, 267–273.

Lawn RJ, Holland AE (2003) Variation in the Vigna lanceolata Benth. complex for traits of taxonomic, adaptive or agronomic interest. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 295–308.
Variation in the Vigna lanceolata Benth. complex for traits of taxonomic, adaptive or agronomic interest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Watkinson AR (2002) Habitat, morphological diversity, and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1305–1316.
Habitat, morphological diversity, and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moneim AMA-E, Varma S (1998) Article 7: Bringing hidden feed to surface. ICARDA Caravan 9, 15–18. Available at: www.icarda.org/Publications/Caravan/Caravan9/Article7.html

Morley FHW (1961) Subterranean clover. Advances in Agronomy 13, 57–123.
Subterranean clover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pengelly BC, Eagles DA (1995) Geographical distribution and diversity in a collection of the tropical legume Macroptilium gracile Poeppiga ex Bentham) Urban. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 569–580.
Geographical distribution and diversity in a collection of the tropical legume Macroptilium gracile Poeppiga ex Bentham) Urban.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schmidt A, Schultze-Kraft R, Maass BL, Herrmann R (1994) Aspects of the amphicarpy of the tropical pasture legume Centrosema rotundifolium Mart. Ex Bentham. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) Publication No. 66861. CIAT, Columbia. Available at: http://ciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/ciat_digital/CIAT/66861.pdf

Schultze-Kraft R, Schmidt A, Holm H (1997) Amphicarpic legumes for tropical pasture persistence. ID No. 191: pp. 1–13–1–14. In ‘Proceedings of the International Grasslands Congress XVIII’. Winnepeg, Manitoba and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Available at: www.internationalgrasslands.org/files/igc/publications/1997/1-01-013.pdf

Shepard BM, Lawn RJ, Schneider MA (1983) ‘Insects on grain legumes in northern Australia—a survey of potential pests and their enemies.’ (University of Queensland Press: Brisbane)

Smartt J (1976) Comparative evolution of pulse crops. Euphytica 25, 139–143.
Comparative evolution of pulse crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smartt J (1978) The evolution of pulse crops. Economic Botany 32, 185–198.
The evolution of pulse crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tindale MD, Craven LA (1988) Three new species of Glycine (Fabaceae: Phaseolae) from north-western Australia, with notes on amphicarpy in the genus. Australian Journal of Systematic Botany 1, 399–410.
Three new species of Glycine (Fabaceae: Phaseolae) from north-western Australia, with notes on amphicarpy in the genus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van der Maesen LJG (2003) Cajaninae of Australia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Australian Systematic Botany 16, 219–227.
Cajaninae of Australia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

White CT (1918) On a peculiar subterranean fruiting habit of Vigna lanceolata, R. Br., with a description of a new variety. Queensland Agricultural Journal July 1918, 41–44.

Williams RW (1989) A study of the causes of, and selection for resistance to, weather damage in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek; V. mungo (L.) Hepper). PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia.

Williams RW, Lawn RJ, Imrie BC, Byth DE (1995) Studies on weather damage in mungbean. I. Effect of weathering on seed quality and viability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 887–899.
Studies on weather damage in mungbean. I. Effect of weathering on seed quality and viability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yeates SJ, Lawn RJ, Adkins SW (2000) Prediction of weather damage of mungbean seed in tropical Australia. I. Relation between seed quality, weather and reproductive development. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 637–648.
Prediction of weather damage of mungbean seed in tropical Australia. I. Relation between seed quality, weather and reproductive development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |