Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF06101
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(8)

Spatial distribution of commercial dredge fishing effort: application to survey design and the spatial management of a patchily distributed benthic bivalve species

Julian J. Harrington A B , Jayson M. Semmens A and Malcolm Haddon A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Marine Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: Julian.Harrington@utas.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(8) 756-764 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06101
Submitted: 13 June 2006  Accepted: 28 June 2007   Published: 27 August 2007

Abstract

The patchy spatial distribution of many benthic commercial bivalve species plays an important role in determining the fishing and management strategies applied within a fishery. This study used fisher catch-return data and high resolution Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data to determine the distribution of fishing effort within a region opened to commercial dredge fishing during the 2003 Tasmanian commercial scallop (Pecten fumatus) fishery, Australia. Fisher catch return data suggested that most (88%) of the open region was fished, however, fine-scale VMS data showed that 50% of the fishing effort occurred within 0.85% of the total area available to fishing, and 95% of the effort occurred within ~12% of the open region. The distribution of VMS inferred that the fishing effort was found to be patchy at all measured spatial scales (5 × 5 km to 250 × 250 m grid cell sizes); however, the degree of patchiness decreased with lower spatial scale cell sizes. Significant differences in the dredged benthic communities recorded within regions exposed to different concentrations of fishing intensity (heavy, moderate and low) were observed, with low and moderately fished regions containing high abundances of screwshells and their associated hermit crabs. Water depth was found to explain some of these observed differences, suggesting that the results may be the consequence of fisher behaviour over pre-existing habitat types. The observed distribution of the fishing effort and scallop beds within the Tasmanian commercial scallop, Pecten fumatus, fishery suits a closed area spatial management strategy, with the areas opened to fishing potentially being of the same scale as scallop beds (km × km).

Additional keywords: benthic communities, fishing effort, scallop fisheries, spatial management, spatial scale.


Acknowledgements

Funding for this project came from the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (March 2003 survey) and Fisheries Research Development Corporation (November 2003 survey) (2003/017) to MH and JS. Further financial support was contributed by Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Water and Environment. We wish to thank the skippers and crew of the Dell Richey II for their support during the surveys. Thanks also to C. Gardner, P. Ziegler, H. Pederson and A. Hirst for their helpful comments on the manuscript.


References

Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brand A. R. (2006). Scallop ecology: distribution and behaviour. In ‘Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture’. 2nd edn. (Eds S. E. Shumway and G. J. Parsons.) pp. 991–1035. (Elsevier: Leiden.)

Clarke K., and Warwick R. (2001). ‘Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation.’ 2nd edn. (PRIMER – E: Plymouth.)

Currie, D. R. , and Parry, G. D. (1999). Impacts and efficiency of scallop dredging on different soft substrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56, 539–550.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Haddon M., Harrington J. J., and Semmens J. M. (2006). Juvenile scallop discard rates and bed dynamics: testing the management rules for scallops in Bass Strait. FRDC Final Report. University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Haggan N. (2001). Reinventing the tree: reflections on the organic growth and creative pruning of fisheries management structures. In ‘Reinventing Fisheries Management’. (Eds T. J. Pitcher, P. J. B. Hart and D. Pauly.) pp. 19–29. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.)

Halpern, B. S. (2003). The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter? Ecological Applications 13, 117–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hooge P. N., Eichenlaub W. M., and Solomon E. K. (2001). Using GIS to analyse animal movements in the marine environment. In ‘Spatial Processes and Management of Marine Populations’. (Eds G. H. Kruse, N. Bez, A. Booth, M. W. Dorn, S. Hills, R. N. Lipcius, D. Pelletier, C. Roy, S. J. Smith and D. Witherell.) pp. 37–51. (University of Alaska Sea Grant, AK-SG-01–02: Fairbanks.)

Marsden I. D., and Bull M. F. (2006). New Zealand. In ‘Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture’. 2nd edn. (Eds S. E. Shumway and G. J. Parsons.) pp. 1413–1439. (Elsevier: Dordrecht.)

McArdle, B. H. , and Anderson, M. J. (2001). Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy anaylsis. Ecology 82, 290–297.
Orensanz J. M., Parma A. M., Turk T., and Valero J. (2006). Dynamics, assessment and management of exploited natural populations. In ‘Scallops: Biology, Ecology and Aquaculture’. 2nd edn. (Eds S. E. Shumway and G. J. Parsons.) pp. 765–867. (Elsevier: Dordrecht.)

Pielou E. C. (1977). ‘Mathematical Ecology.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York.)

Rijnsdorp, A. D. , Buys, A. M. , Storbeck, F. , and Visser, E. G. (1998). Micro-scale distribution of beam trawl effort in the southern North Sea between 1993 and 1996 in relation to the trawling frequency of the sea bed and the impact on benthic organisms. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55, 403–419.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith, S. J. , and Rago, P. (2004). Biological reference points for sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus): the benefits and costs of being nearly sessile. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 1338–1354.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stokesbury, K. D. (2002). Estimation of Sea Scallop abundance in closed areas of Georges Bank, USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131, 1081–1092.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Veale, L. O. , Hill, A. S. , Hawkins, A. S. J. , and Brand, A. R. (2000). Effects of long-term physical disturbance by commercial scallop fishing on subtidal epifaunal assemblages and habitats. Marine Biology 137, 325–337.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Worton, B. J. (1989). Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70, 164–168.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |