Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF06198
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(8)

Does adding wood to agricultural streams enhance biodiversity? An experimental approach

Rebecca E Lester A B C , Wendy Wright A and Michelle Jones-Lennon B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Monash University, Gippsland Campus, Churchill, Vic. 3842, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rebecca.lester@flinders.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(8) 687-698 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06198
Submitted: 23 October 2006  Accepted: 9 May 2007   Published: 20 August 2007

Abstract

Riparian clearing and the removal of wood from channels have affected many streams in agricultural landscapes. As a result, these streams often have depauperate in-stream wood loads, and therefore decreased habitat complexity and lower levels of in-stream biodiversity. The introduction of wood was investigated as a possible rehabilitation technique for agricultural streams. Wood was re-introduced to eight streams in two separate high-rainfall, intensively grazed regions of Victoria, Australia and the effect on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities was measured. The addition of wood increased overall family richness and the richness of most functional feeding groups occupying edge and benthic habitats within the stream. Wood addition led to less overlap between benthic and edge macroinvertebrate communities, suggesting increased habitat heterogeneity within the stream ecosystem. Of all sampled habitats, wood supported the greatest density of families and was colonised by all functional feeding groups. Wood habitats also had the highest overall richness and supported the most taxa that were sensitive to disturbance. These findings suggest that re-introducing wood to agricultural streams is an appropriate rehabilitation technique where those streams are affected by reduced habitat complexity. Additional work is needed to confirm these findings over larger spatial and temporal scales.

Additional keywords: agricultural landscape, aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity, coarse woody debris, ecological restoration, stream rehabilitation, wood load.


Acknowledgements

This research was conducted as a part of R. Lester’s Ph.D. studies, supported by a scholarship from the School of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Monash University and in-kind support from the Department of Primary Industries, Ellinbank. We thank those landholders who generously providing access to their properties, and all those who assisted with the study, especially the Productive Grazing, Healthy Rivers project team. We also thank G. Quinn and P. S. Lake for assistance with experimental design, M. Hannah and P. Rayment for assistance in statistical analysis and R. Thompson, J. Larkins, P. Fairweather and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.


References

Barlow B. A. (1994). Phytogeography of the Australian region. In ‘Australian Vegetation’. (Ed. R. H. Groves.) pp. 3–35. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Benke, A. C. , Henry, R. L. , Gillespie, D. M. , and Hunter, R. J. (1985). Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries 10, 8–13.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clarke K. R., and Gorley R. N. (2001). ‘PRIMER v5. User Manual/Tutorial.’ (PRIMER-E: Plymouth.)

Clarke K. R., and Warwick R. M. (2001). ‘Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation.’ 2nd edn. (PRIMER-E: Plymouth.)

Colwell R. K. (2005). ‘EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples.’ Version 7.5.0 (Software and User's Guide and application published at http://purl.ococ.org/estimates). (University of Connecticut: Storrs.)

Costermans L. F. (1994). ‘Trees of Victoria and Adjoining Areas.’ (Costermans Publishing: Frankston.)

Crook, D. A. , and Robertson, A. I. (1999). Relationships between riverine fish and woody debris: implications for lowland rivers. Marine and Freshwater Research 50, 941–953.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Galwey N. W. (2006). ‘Introduction to Mixed Modelling: Beyond Regression and Analysis of Variance.’ (John Wiley and Sons: West Sussex.)

Gerhard, M. , and Reich, M. (2000). Restoration of streams with large wood: effects of accumulated and built-in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. International Review of Hydrobiology 85, 123–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Gippel C. J., and White K. (2000). Re-introduction techniques for instream large woody debris. In ‘A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams’. (Eds I. D. Rutherfurd, K. Jerie and N. Marsh.) pp. 313–321. (Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation and Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology: Canberra.)

Gooderham J., and Tsyrlin E. (2002). ‘The Waterbug Book: A Guide to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Temperate Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Gotelli, N. J. , and Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4, 379–391.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hawking J. H. (2000). ‘Key to Keys. A Guide to Keys and Zoological Information to Identify Invertebrates from Australian Inland Waters. Identification Guide No 2.’ (Murray Darling Freshwater Research Centre: Albury.)

Heilmann-Clausen, J. , and Christensen, M. (2004). Does size matter? On the importance of various dead wood fractions for fungal diversity in Danish beech forests. Forest Ecology and Management 201, 105–117.
Koehn J. (1987). ‘Artificial Habitat Increases Abundance of Two-spined Blackfish (Gadopsis bispinosis) in Ovens River, Victoria.’ (Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research: Melbourne.)

Laasonen, P. , Muotka, T. , and Kivijarvi, I. (1998). Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems 8, 101–113.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCafferty W. P. (1981). ‘Aquatic Entomology: The Fishermen’s and Ecologists’ Illustrated Guide to Insects and their Relatives.’ (Science Books International: Boston.)

McKie, B. G. L. , and Cranston, P. S. (1998). Keystone coleopterans? Colonization by wood-feeding elmids of experimentally immersed woods in south-eastern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 49, 79–88.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Marsh N., Rutherfurd I. D., and Jerie K. (1999). Large woody debris in some Australian streams: natural loadings, distribution and morphological effects. In ‘Second Australian Stream Management Conference Proceedings: the Challenge of Rehabilitating Australia’s Streams, 8–11 February 1999’. Volume 2. (Eds I. D. Rutherfurd and R. Bartley.) pp. 427–432. (Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Adelaide.)

Mead R., Curnow R. N., and Hasted A. M. (1993). ‘Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: London.)

Merritt R. W., and Cummins K. W. (Eds) (1984). ‘An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America.’ (Kendall Hunt Publishing: Dubuque.)

Neumann, R. M. , and Wildman, T. L. (2002). Relationships between trout habitat use and woody debris in two southern New England streams. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 11, 240–250.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | DNRE (1997). ‘Victoria’s Biodiversity: Directions in Management.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Melbourne.)

DNRE (2002). ‘Biodiversity Conservation in Intensive Grazing Systems: Riparian and In-stream Management.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Ellinbank.)

O’Connor, N. A. (1991). The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonizing wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85, 504–512.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Reich M., Kershner J. L., and Wildman R. C. (2003). Restoring streams with large wood: a synthesis. In ‘The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers’. (Eds S. V. Gregory, K. L. Boyer and A. M. Gurnell.) pp. 355–356. (American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD.)

Robertson, A. I. , and Rowling, R. W. (2000). Effects of livestock on riparian zone vegetation in an Australian dryland river. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16, 527–541.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rutherfurd I. D., Jerie K., and Marsh N. (2000). ‘A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams. Volumes 1 and 2.’ (Land & Water Resources Research and Development Corporation and Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology: Canberra.)

Saville, D. (2003). Basic statistics and the inconsistency of multiple comparison procedures. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57, 167–175.
| PubMed | Shaw P. J. A. (2003). ‘Multivariate Statistics for Environmental Sciences.’ (Hodder Arnold: London.)

Shields, F. D. , Knight, S. S. , and Cooper, C. M. (1994). Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes. Environmental Management 18, 43–57.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Triska F. J., and Cormack K.Jr (1980). The role of wood debris in forests and streams. In ‘Forests: Fresh Perspectives from Ecosystem Analysis. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Biology Colloquium’. Oregon State University. (Ed. R. H. Waring.) pp. 171–190. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis.)

Wallace, J. , and Benke, A. (1984). Quantification of wood habitat in subtropical coastal plain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41, 1643–1652.
Williams W. D. (1980). ‘Australian Freshwater Life: the Invertebrates of Australian Inland Waters.’ (Macmillan: Melbourne.)

Wright, I. A. , Chessman, B. C. , Fairweather, P. G. , and Benson, L. J. (1995). Measuring the impact of sewage effluent on the macroinvertebrate community of an upland stream: The effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Australian Journal of Ecology 20, 142–149.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |