International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Long-term forest fire retardants: a review of quality, effectiveness, application and environmental considerations

Anna Giménez A B , Elsa Pastor A , Luis Zárate A , Eulàlia Planas A and Josep Arnaldos A

A CERTEC: Centre d’Estudis del Risc Tecnològic (Centre for Studies on Technological Risk) Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Av. Diagonal, 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain).

B Corresponding author. Telephone: +34 93 4016675; fax: +34 93 4017150; email: anna.gimenez@upc.es

International Journal of Wildland Fire 13(1) 1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF03001
Submitted: 17 January 2003  Accepted: 30 September 2003   Published: 8 April 2004

Abstract

Since the beginning of the 1930s research has been directed towards improving the effectiveness of water as a forest fire extinguishing agent. Throughout this time various chemical substances have been added to the water, and this is still the case today. Among these substances are the various types of long-term forest fire retardant, which maintain their ability to alter combustion when the water has been removed by evaporation. In order to provide an account of the current state of development of studies on long-term forest fire retardants, we carried out a bibliographic analysis with special attention to work done after 1976 on the different aspects that influence the final effectiveness of forest fire retardant: quality (programs and evaluation), effectiveness, application and environmental impact on streams and aquatic organisms, vegetation and humans. The scope of this work covers the wide subject of fire retardants and it introduces significant work related to all the aspects of fire retardant use.


References

Adams R Simmons D 1999 Ecological effects of fire fighting foams and retardants. Proceedings of Australian Bushfire Conference Albury. [on line] Available from http://life.csu.edu.au/bushfire99

Andersen WH Brown RE Louie NA Katio KG Buchfield IA Dalby JD Zerpow L 1976 Correlation of rheological properties of liquid fire retardant with aerially delivered performance. Contract 26-3198 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT

Andersen WH Wong JY 1978 Dynamic interaction of fire retardant droplets with fuel and the correlation with the rheological properties of the retardant. Contract 839–2031–7 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final Report Ogden, UT


Anderson HE 1974 Forest fire retardant: transmission through a tree crown. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-153 Ogden, UT


APHA 1971 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 13th American Public Health Association Washington, D.C.


ASTM 1989 Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 11.04 378 397


ASTM 1990 Standard guide for conducting static 96-hour toxicity tests with microalgae. ASTM Guide E 1218–90. ASTM Philadelphia, PA


ASTM 1998 Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates and amphibians. ASTM Guide E 729–88a. ASTM Philadelphia, PA


Barret LI 1931 Possibilities of fire extinguishes chemicals in fighting forest fires. Journal of Forestry 29 214


Blahm T Marshall WC Snyder GR 1974 Effect of chemical fire retardants on the survival of juvenile salmonoids. Final Report US Department of Commerce, NOAA National Marine Fish, Service Environment Facilities Prescott, OR


Blakely AD 1983 Monoammonium phosphate: effect on flammability of excelsior and pine needles. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-313 Ogden, UT


Blakely AD 1985 Combustion recovery: a measurement of fire retardant extinguishment capability. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-352 Ogden, UT


Blakely AD 1988 Flammability reduction comparisons of four forest fire retardants. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-381 Ogden, UT


Blakely AD 1990 Combustion recovery of flaming pine needle fuel beds sprayed with water/MAP mixtures. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-421 Ogden, UT


Blakely AD George CW Johnson GM 1982 Static testing to evaluate airtanker delivery performance. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-78 Ogden, UT


Bradstock R Sanders J Tegart A 1987 Short-term effects on the foliage of a eucalypt forest after an aerial application of a chemical fire retardant. Australian Forestry 50 2 71 80


Buhl KJ Hamilton SJ 1998 Acute toxicity of fire-retardant and foam suppressant chemicals to early life stages of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17 8 1589 1599


Buhl KJ Hamilton SJ 2000 Acute toxicity of fire-control chemicals, nitrogenous chemicals, and surfactants to Rainbow Trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129 408 418


Calogine D Leprévost JC Rimbert N Séro-Guillaume O 2000 Modeling of dropping and atomization. ACRE project. Unpublished data


Davis JB 1960 Air drop tests, Willows, Santa Ana, Ramona, 1955–59. California Air Attack Coordinating Committee USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Berkeley, CA


Davis JB Dibble DL Clinton BP 1961 Firefighting chemical... new weapons for the fire suppression crew. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Paper PSW-57 Berkeley, CA


Davis JB Dibble DL Phillips CB Mc Bride RS 1962 Viscous water and algin gel as fire control materials. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Technical Paper PSW-71 Berkeley, CA


DeLonay AJ Little EE Lipton JJ Woodward DF Hansen J 1996 Behavioral avoidance as evidence of injury to fishery resources: applications to natural resource damage assessments. Environmental toxicology and risk assessment: fourth volume LaPoint TW Price FT Little EE 268 280 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia, PA


Dodge M 1970 Nitrate poisoning, fire retardants, and fertilizers—any connection? Journal of Range Management 23 4 244 247


EPA 1975 Methods for acute toxicity tests with fish, macroinvertebrats and amphibians EPA Ecological Research Series Committee on Methods for Toxicity Tests with Aquatic Organisms Washington, D.C.


Gaikowski MP Hamilton SJ Buhl KJ 1996 Acute toxicity of three retardant and two fire-suppressant foam formulations to the early life stages of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15 8 1365 1374


Gale RD Mauk SG 1983 An evaluation of fire retardant use. Policy Analysis Staff Report USDA Forest Service Washington, D.C.


Gehring GA 1974 An investigation of fire retardant caused corrosion. Contract 26–3250 Ocean City Research Corp. Ocean City NJ. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final Report Ogden, UT


Gehring GA 1978 Laboratory studies of fire retardant corrosion. Contract 26–3250 Ocean City Research Corp. Ocean City NJ to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final report Ogden, UT


Gehring GA 1980 Corrosion survey of selected northern California airtankers. Contract 40–0353–7-799 Ocean City Research Corp. Ocean City NJ to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final Report Ogden, UT


Gehring GA Jr. George CW 1986 Guidelines for preventing fire retardant corrosion. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-210 Ogden, UT


George CW 1970 Literature review of the toxicity of fire retardant components toward fish and other aquatic organisms. A report of research on the behavior and impact of chemical fire retardants in forest streams. Appendix III 1 11 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Corvallis, OR


George CW 1975 Fire retardant ground distribution patterns from the CL-215 air tanker. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-165 Ogden, UT


George CW 1982 Measurements of airtanker drop conditions during firefighting operations. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-299 Ogden, UT


George CW Blakely AD 1970 Energy release rates in fire retardant evaluation. Fire Technology 6 3 203 210


George CW Blakely AD 1972 Effects of ammonium sulfate and ammonium phosphate on flammability. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Range and Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-121 Ogden, UT


George CW Blakely AD 1973 An evaluation of drop characteristics and ground distribution patterns of forest fire retardants. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-134 Ogden, UT


George CW Blakely AD Johnson GM 1976 Forest fire retardant research—A status report. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-31 Ogden, UT


George CW Blakely AD Johnson GM Simmerman DG 1977 Evaluation of liquid ammonium polyphosphate fire retardants. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-41 Ogden, UT


George CW Johnson CW 1986 Determining fire retardant quality in the field. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-201 Ogden, UT


George CW Johnson GM 1990 Developing air tanker performance guidelines. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-268 Ogden, UT


George CW Sussot RA 1971 Effects of ammonium phosphate and sulfate on the pyrolysis and combustion of cellulose. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-18 Ogden, UT


Giraud F Picard C 2000 ACRE project. Proceedings of the Research Special Session. Euromediterranean Wildfire Meetings Research Special Session 123 132 Hyères CEREN Gardanne, France


Grigel JE 1970 Air drop tests with the snow commander airtanker and Gelgard fire retardant. M.F. Thesis University of Montana Missoula


Grigel JE 1971 Air drop tests with Fire-Trol-100 and Phos-Check 205 fire retardants. Information Report NOR-X-8 Canadian Forest Service Edmonton


Grigel JE 1972 B-26 Airtanker air drop tests with liquid concentrate. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forest Research Centre. Forest Report 2 1 4 5


Hamilton SJ McDonald SF Gaikowski MP Buhl KJ 1996 Toxicity of fire retardant chemicals to aquatic organisms: progress report. Proceedings of International Wildland Fire Foam Symposium and Workshop Thunderbay. [on line]
Available from http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/fireweb/toxicity/toxicity.htm

Hardy CE 1977 Chemicals for forest fire fighting 3rd National Fire Protection Association Boston

Hardy CE Rothermel RC Davis JB 1962 Evaluation of forest fire retardants—a test of chemicals on laboratory fires. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-64 Ogden, UT


Johansen RW Shimmel JW 1963 Increasing the viscosity of water and chemical fire retardants with clays and gums. Georgia Forest Research Council, Forest Research Paper 19 Macon, GA


Johnson CW George CW 1990 Relative corrosivity of currently approved wildland fire chemicals. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-437 Ogden, UT


Johnson G Jordan C 2000 Airtanker drop guides. USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, Missoula Technology & Development Center Missoula, MT


Johnson WW Sanders HO 1977 Chemical forest fire retardants: acute toxicity to five freshwater fishes and a scud. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Technical Paper No. 91 Washington, D.C.


Kalabokidis KD 2000 Effects of wildfire suppression chemicals on people and the environment – A review. Global Nest: The International Journal 2 2 129 137


Labat Anderson Inc. 1994 Human health risk assessment: chemicals used in wildland fire suppression. Labat Anderson Inc. Contract 53–3187–9-30 to USDA Forest Service, Fire and Aviation Management Arlington, VA.


Larson DL Newton WE Anderson P Stein SJ 1999 Effects of fire retardant chemical and fire suppressant foam on shrub steppe vegetation in northern Nevada. International Journal of Wildland Fire 9 2 115 127
doi:10.1071/WF00013

Larson JR Duncan DA 1982 Annual grassland response to fire retardant and wildfire. Journal of Range Management 35 6 700 703

Little EE Calfee RD 2000 The effects of UVB radiation on the toxicity of fire-fighting chemicals. USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center, Final Report to USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, Missoula Technology & Development Center Missoula, MT


Little EE Calfee RD 2002a Effects of fire-retardant chemical products on fathead minnows in experimental streams. USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center, Final Report to USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, Missoula Technology & Development Center Missoula, MT


Little EE Calfee RD 2002b Environmental persistence and toxicity of fire-retardant chemicals, Fire-Trol GRS-R and Phos-Chek D-75 to fathead minnows. USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center, Final Report to USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, Missoula Technology & Development Center Missoula, MT


Little EE Calfee RD 2002c Environmental implications of fire-retardant chemicals. USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center, Project Summary to USDA Forest Service, Aviation and Fire Management Washington, D.C.


Little EE Wells JB Calfee RD 2002 Behavioral avoidance/attractance response of rainbow trout to fire-retardant chemicals. USGS Columbia Environmental Research Center, Final Report to USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems, Missoula Technology & Development Centre Missoula, MT


Loane IT Gould JS 1986 Project Aquarius: aerial suppression of bushfires—cost–benefit study for Victoria Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Division of Forest Research / National Bushfire Research Unit Canberra


Lovellette G 2000 Safe drop height for fixed wing airtankers. USDA Forest Service, Technology and Development Program, 0057–2317-MTDC Missoula, MT


McDonald SF Hamilton SJ Buhl KJ Heisinger JF 1997 Acute toxicity of fire-retardant and foam suppressant to Hyalella azteca. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16 7 1370 1376


Mount DI Brungs WA 1967 A simplified dosing apparatus for fish toxicology studies. Water Resources 1 21 29
doi:10.1016/0043-1354(67)90061-9

Newstead RG 1973 Recent airtanker drop tests. Northern Forest Research Centre, Forest Report No. 3(1) Canadian Forest Service Edmonton

Newstead RG Lieskovsky RJ 1985 Air tanker and fire retardant drop patterns. Information Report NOR-X-273 Canadian Forest Service Edmonton


Norris LA Hawkes C Webb WL Moore DG Bollen WB Holcombe E 1978 A report of research on the behavior and impact of chemical fire retardants in forest streams. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Internal Report Corvallis, OR


Norris LA Webb WL 1989 Effects of fire retardant on water quality. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PSW-109 Berkeley, CA


Northeast Forest Fires Supervisors 1987 An analysis of ground application of retardants. Roscommon Equipment Center Program, Project No. 41 Roscommon, MI


NWCG 2000 Lot acceptance, quality assurance, and field quality control for fire retardant chemicals. National Wildfire Coordinating Group, National Interagency Fire Center, Report NFES 1245 Boise, ID


Operation Firestop 1955a Progress Report No. 4, Retardants-I. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Berkeley, CA


Operation Firestop 1955b Progress Report No.9. Aerial firefighting. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Berkeley, CA


Rawson R 1977 A study of the distribution of aerially applied fire retardant in softwood plantations. Division of Forest Protection Report No. 1 Fire Research Branch, Forest Commission Melbourne, Victoria


Rees B 1983 Retardant distribution for six agricultural aircraft. Division of Forest Protection Report No. 16 Fire Research Branch, Forest Commission Melbourne, Victoria


Robertson K Fogarty L Webb S 1997 a Firebombing effectiveness—Where to from here? Fire Technology Transfer Note N.11 National Rural Fire Authority, Forest Research Institute, Forest and Rural Fire Research New Zealand


Robertson K Fogarty L Webb S 1997b Guidelines for determining aerial drop patterns in open areas. Fire Technology Transfer Note N.12 National Rural Fire Authority, Forest Research Institute, Forest and Rural Fire Research New Zealand


Rothermel RC 1972 A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115 Ogden, UT


Rothermel RC Philpot CW 1975 Reducing fire spread in wildland fuels. Experimental methods in fire research. Proceedings of the Meeting to Honor Clay Preston Butler 369 403 Stanford Research Institute Stanford, CA


Storey TG Wendel GW Altobellis AT 1959 Testing the TBM aerial tanker in the southeast. USDA Forest Service, Southeast Forest Experiment Station Paper 101


Swanson DH Helvig TN 1973 High altitude drop mechanization study: Final report. Honeywell Contract 26–2888 Vol. I–II to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT


Swanson DH Helvig TN 1974 Extended high altitude drop mechanization study: Final report. Honeywell Contract 26–288 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT


Swanson DH Luedecke AD Helvig TN 1978 Experimental tank and gating system (ETAGS) Honeywell Contract 26–3245 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final Report Ogden, UT


Swanson DH Luedecke AD Helvig TN Parduhn FJ 1975 Development of user guidelines for selected retardant aircraft: Final report. Honeywell Contract 26–3332 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT


Swanson DH Luedecke AD Helvig TN Parduhn FJ 1977 Supplement to development of user guidelines for selected retardant aircraft. Honeywell Contract 26–3332 to USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Final report Ogden, UT


Truax TR 1939 The use of chemicals in forest fire control. Forest Products Laboratory Report 1199 USDA Forest Service Madison


Tyner HD 1941 Fire extinguishing effectiveness of chemicals in water solution. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 33 1 60 65


USDA Forest Service 1969 Specification for retardant, forest fire, dry chemical for fixed-wing aircraft application. Interim specification 5100–00301 USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 1970 Specification for retardant, forest fire, liquid chemical, unthickened for aircraft or ground application. Interim specification 5100–00302. USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 1975a Specification for retardant, forest fire, dry chemical for aircraft or ground application. Interim specification 5100–00301a USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 1975b Specification for retardant, forest fire, liquid chemical, unthickened for aircraft or ground application. Interim specification 5100–00302b USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 1982 Specification for long-term retardant, forest fire, aircraft or ground application. Interim specification 5100–304 USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 1986 Specification for long-term retardant, forest fire, aircraft or ground application. Interim specification. 5100–304a USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Equipment Development Center San Dimas, CA


USDA Forest Service 2000 Specification for long-term retardants, wildland fire, aircraft or ground application. Interim specification 5100–304b USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center San Dimas, CA


Van Meter WP George CW 1981 Correlating laboratory air drop data with retardant rheological properties. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-278 Ogden, UT


Van Meter WP George CW Johnson CW 1985 Chemical analysis procedures for forest fire retardant constituents. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-181 Ogden, UT


Vandersall HL 1994 Air attack: retardants, rheology and some new options. International Journal of Wildland Fire 4 1 45 51


Vandersall HL 1998 The impact of rheology on the performance of aerially applied wildland fire retardant solutions. Proceedings of the III International Conference on Forest Fire Research, 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology 16–20 Nov.1998 Viegas X 2317 2333 Coimbra ADAI Coimbra, Portugal
Vol. II.

Xanthopoulos G Noussia P 2000 Small scale evaluation of the width of a retardant-reinforced firebreak required to stop a forest fire. (Preliminary Version). ACRE project




Export Citation