Fire danger rating in the United States of America: an evolution since 1916*
Colin C. Hardy A C and Charles E. Hardy B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 US Highway 10 West, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.
B Retired. Formerly of Northern Forest Fire Laboratory (now called the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory), USDA Forest Service.
C Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(2) 217-231 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06076
Published: 30 April 2007
Fire scientists in the United States began exploring the relationships of fire-danger and hazard with weather, fuel moisture, and ignition probabilities as early as 1916. Many of the relationships identified then persist today in the form of our National Fire-Danger-Rating System. This paper traces the evolution of fire-danger rating in the United States, including discussions of significant developmental milestones, innovative instrumentation, and a succession of analogue fire-danger meters, or calculators. Although the primary theme of this paper is an historical review of pioneering efforts leading up to our current state-of-knowledge, a common thread throughout this paper is the desire by every generation of developer to achieve a ‘purely analytical system’. A national system was first introduced in 1964. The current system used throughout the USA was implemented in 1978, with optional revisions added in 1988. We present this evolution within the context of three periods of development: first, the pioneering efforts initiated at the Priest River Experiment Station in northern Idaho; second, the implementation of a national, standardised fire-danger-rating system; and third, spatially explicit delivery systems that provide a national view of weather and fire potential, which include national fire-danger and weather maps and satellite-derived maps that reflect the state of live vegetation across the United States.
Andrews PL, Bradshaw LS (1991) Use of meteorological information for fire management in the United States. In ‘Workshop on Meteorological Information for Fire Management in the United States’. pp. 325–332. (Rabat, Morroco)
Brackebusch AP (1975) Gain and loss of moisture in large forest fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-173. (Ogden, UT).
Bradshaw LS, McCormick E (2000) FireFamily Plus user's guide, version 2.0. (USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station) Available at: www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr67.html [Verified 2000]
Bradshaw LS, Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1983) The 1978 National Fire-Danger-Rating System: technical documentation. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-169. (Ogden, UT)
Burgan RE (1979) Estimating live fuel moisture for the 1978 National Fire-Danger-Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-226. (Ogden, UT)
Burgan RE (1988) 1988 revisions to the 1978 National Fire-Danger-Rating System. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station Research Paper SE-273. (Asheville, NC)
Burgan RE, Hartford RA (1993) Monitoring vegetation greenness with satellite data. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-297. (Ogden, UT)
Burgan RE, Cohen WB, Deeming JE (1977) Manually calculating fire-danger ratings–1978 National Fire-Danger-Rating System. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-40. (Ogden, UT)
Burgan RE, Andrews PL, Bradshaw LS, Chase CH, Hartford RA , Latham DJ
(1987) WFAS: wildland fire assessment system. Fire Management Notes 57, 14–17.
Burgan RE, Hartford RA, Eidenshink JC, Werth LF (1991) Estimation of vegetation greenness and site moisture using AVHRR data. In ‘11th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Missoula, MT’. (Eds PL Andrews, DF Potts) pp. 17–24. (Society of American Foresters)
Burgan RE, Hartford RA, Eidenshink JC (1996) Using NDVI to assess departure from average greenness and its relation to fire business. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-333. (Ogden, UT)
Calkin D (2006) Rapid assessment of values at risk for wildland fire decision support systems. In ‘Third International Fire Ecology and Management Congress, San Diego, CA’. p. 282. (Washington State University, Department of Natural Resource Sciences Extension: Pullman, WA) [Abstract]
Deeming JE (1983) Reflections on the development, application, and future of the National Fire-Danger-Rating System. In ‘7th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Fort Collins, CO’. pp. 139–146. (American Meteorological Society)
Deeming JE, Lancaster JW, Fosberg MA, Furman RW, Schroeder P (1972) National fire-danger-rating system. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper RM-84. (Fort Collins, CO)
Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1977) The National Fire-Danger-Rating System – 1978. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-39. (Ogden, UT)
Finney MA (2006) FS Pro: a method for estimating wildland fire spread probabilities. In ‘Third International Fire Ecology and Management Congress, San Diego, CA’. p. 281. (Washington State University, Department of Natural Resource Sciences Extension: Pullman, WA) [Abstract]
Fischer WC, Hardy CE (1976) Fire-weather observer’s handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 494. (Washington, DC)
Gale RS, Eubanks R, Roussopoulos PJ (1986) ‘NFDRS-East Workshop Proceedings. USDA Forest Service, Fire and Atmospheric Sciences Research. Washington, DC NFDRS-East Workshop.’ (Harper’s Ferry: WV)
Gisborne HT (1922) Weather records applied to the fire problem. USDA Forest Service, Northern Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Applied Forestry Note 42. (Missoula, MT)
(1923) Importance of duff moisture content in the forest fire problem. Journal of Forestry 21, 807–809.
(1924) Moisture content of fuels as an index of fire danger. Lumber World Review 45, 44.
Gisborne HT (1925) The effect of weather on the inflammability of forest fire fuels. USDA Forest Service Northern Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Applied Forestry Note 58. (Missoula, MT)
(1926) Lightning and forest fires in the northern Rocky Mountain Region. Monthly Weather Review 54, 281–286.
| CrossRef |
(1927a) An investigation of lightning storms in the Northern Rocky Mountain region. Northwest Science 1, 72–73.
(1927b) The objectives of forest fire-weather research. Journal of Forestry 25, 452–456.
Gisborne HT (1928) Measuring forest fire danger in Northern Idaho. USDA Miscellaneous Publication 64. (Washington, DC)
(1929) The complicated controls of fire danger. Journal of Forestry 27, 311–312.
Goward SN, Markham B, Dye DG, Dulaney W , Yang J
(1991) Normalized difference vegetation index measurements from the advanced very high resolution radiometer. Remote Sensing of Environment 35, 257–277.
| CrossRef |
Hardy CE (1958) The proposed national fire danger rating system. In ‘1958 National Meeting of the American Meteorology Society, Logan, UT’. (American Meteorology Society: Washington, DC)
Hardy CE (1977) The Gisborne era of forest fire research. University of Montana, Forest and Conservation Experiment Station Completion Report Contract No. 12-11-204-1. (Missoula, MT)
Hardy CE (1983) The Gisborne era of forest fire research: legacy of a pioneer. USDA Forest Service Report 367. (Missoula, MT)
Hayes GL (1940) The moisture content of large sized fuels as an index of intraseasonal fire danger severity. MSc thesis, Yale University.
Helfman RS, Deeming JE, Straub RJ, Furman RW (1975) User’s guide to AFFIRMS: Time-sharing computerized processing for fire danger rating. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM-15. (Fort Collins, CO)
Hornby LG (1936) Fire control planning in the Northern Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service, Northern Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Progress Report. (Missoula, MT)
Jolly WM, Graham JM, Michaelis A, Nemani R , Running SW
(2004) A flexible, integrated system for generating meteorological surfaces derived from point sources across multiple geographic scales. Environmental Modelling and Software 20, 873–882.
| CrossRef |
Jolly WM, Nemani R , Running SW
(2005) A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar response to climate. Global Change Biology 11, 619–632.
| CrossRef |
Keetch JJ, Byram GM (1968) A drought index for forest fire control. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station Research Paper SE-38. (Asheville, NC)
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2005) NWCG National Fire Danger Rating System weather station standards. National Wildfire Coordinating Group PMS 426-3. (Boise, ID)
(2000) Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30, 1071–1087.
| CrossRef |
Pyne SJ (2001) ‘Year of the fires: the story of the great fires of 1910.’ (Viking Press: New York)
Rollins MG, Frame CK (2006) The LANDFIRE prototype project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-175. (Fort Collins, CO)
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)
USDA Forest Service (2003) WIMS Web application user guide. (USDA Forest Service, Fire and Aviation Management) Available at: www.fs.fed.us/fire/planning/nist/wims_web_ug/wims_ug_complete061803.pdf [Verified 18 June 2003]
USDA Forest Service, US Department of Interior (2001) Review and update of the 1995 Federal wildland fire management policy. Available at: www.nifc.gov/fire_policy/history/index.htm [Verified 2001]
This article was written and prepared by US Government employees on official time and is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright.