International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sensitivity of a surface fire spread model and associated fire behaviour fuel models to changes in live fuel moisture

W. Matt Jolly

USDA Forest Service, RMRS, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT, USA. Email: mjolly@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(4) 503-509 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06077
Submitted: 16 May 2006  Accepted: 2 February 2007   Published: 20 August 2007

Abstract

Fire behaviour models are used to assess the potential characteristics of wildland fires such as rates of spread, fireline intensity and flame length. These calculations help support fire management strategies while keeping fireline personnel safe. Live fuel moisture is an important component of fire behaviour models but the sensitivity of existing models to live fuel moisture has not been thoroughly evaluated. The Rothermel surface fire spread model was used to estimate key surface fire behaviour values over a range of live fuel moistures for all 53 standard fuel models. Fire behaviour characteristics are shown to be highly sensitive to live fuel moisture but the response is fuel model dependent. In many cases, small changes in live fuel moisture elicit drastic changes in predicted fire behaviour. These large changes are a result of a combination of the model-calculated live fuel moisture of extinction, the effective wind speed limit and the dynamic load transfer function of some of the fuel models tested. Surface fire spread model sensitivity to live fuel moisture changes is discussed in the context of predicted fire fighter safety zone area because the area of a predicted safety zone may increase by an order of magnitude for a 10% decrease in live fuel moisture depending on the fuel model chosen.

Additional keywords: fire behaviour models, live fuel moisture, live fuel moisture of extinction, safety zones.


Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Pat Andrews and the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported in part by funds provided by the Joint Fire Science Program and the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, USA Department of Agriculture. We would like to thank Chip Collins and members of the National Park Service live fuel moisture sampling team in the Grand Tetons National Park for sharing the live fuel moisture data presented here.


References


Agee JK, Wright CS, Williamson N , Huff MH (2002) Foliar moisture content of Pacific Northwest vegetation and its relation to wildland fire behavior. Forest Ecology and Management  167, 57–66.
CrossRef |

Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. INT-30, USDA, Forest Service, Ogden, UT.

Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. GTR-INT-122, USDA Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)

Andrews PL, Bevins CD (2003) BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 2: Overview. In ‘2nd International Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress’. (Orlando, FL)

Andrews PL , Queen LP (2001) Fire modeling and information system technology. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 343–352.
CrossRef |

Burgan RE (1979) Estimating live fuel moisture for the 1978 national fire danger rating system. GTR-INT-226, USDA Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)

Butler B , Cohen JD (1998) Firefigther Safety Zones: A theoretical model based on radiative heating. International Journal of Wildland Fire  8, 73–77.
CrossRef |

Catchpole EA , Catchpole WR (1991) Modelling moisture damping for fire spread in a mixture of live and dead fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire  1, 101–106.
CrossRef |

Ceccato P, Leblon B, Chuvieco E, Flasse S, Carlson JD (2003) Estimation of live fuel moisture content. In ‘Wildland fire danger estimation and mapping, the role of remote sensing data’. (Ed. E Chuvieco) (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Singapore)

Cheney NP, Gould JS , Catchpole WR (1998) Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire  8, 1–13.
CrossRef |

Countryman CM (1972) The fire environment concept. (USDA Forest Service: Berkely, CA)

Finney MA (2004) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – Model development and evaluation. RMRS-RP-4 Revised, USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. (Fort Collins, CO)

Finney MA (2006) An overview of FlamMap modeling capabilities. In ‘Fuels Management – How to measure success’. (Eds PL Andrews, B Butler) p. 809. (USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: Portland, OR)

Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. (Ottawa, ON)

Fosberg MA, Schroeder MJ (1971) Fine herbaceous fuels in fire-danger rating. RM-185, USDA, Forest Service. (Fort Collins, CO)

Isukapalli SS (1999) Uncertainty analysis of transport-transformation models. (Rutgers University, Newark: NJ)

McArthur AG (1966) Forest fire danger meter. (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, Australia)

McArthur AG (1969) The Tasmanian bushfires of 7th February, 1967 and associated fire behaviour characteristics. A7. (Forest Research Institute, Canberra: Australia)

McArthur AG (1977) Grassland fire danger meter Mk V. (Canberra, Australia)

McRae GJ, Tilden JW , Seinfeld JH (1982) Global sensitivity analysis – a computational implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST). Computers & Chemical Engineering  6, 15–25.
CrossRef |

Mutch RW (1967) Cheatgrass coloration – a key to flammability? Journal of Range Management  20, 259.


Noble IR, Gill AM , Bary GAV (1980) McArthur's fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Austral Ecology  5, 201–203.
CrossRef |

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. INT-115, USDA, Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)

Rothermel RC (1991) Predicting behavior and size of crown fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains. INT-438, USDA, U.S. Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)

Scott JH, Burgan RE (2005) Standard fire behavior fuel models: A comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. RMRS-GTR-153, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. (Fort Collins, CO)

Van Wagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  7, 23–34.


Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L , Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral – ‘go or no-go?’. International Journal of Wildland Fire  14, 99–106.
CrossRef |

Wilson RAJr (1982) A reexamination of fire spread in free-burning porous fuel beds. INT-289, USDA, Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)

Wilson RA (1985) Observations of extinction and marginal burning states in free burning porous fuel beds. Combustion Science and Technology  44, 179–193.

CrossRef |

Wilson RAJr (1990) Reexamination of Rothermel's fire spread equations in no-wind and no-slope conditions. INT-434, USDA, Forest Service. (Ogden, UT)



Export Citation Cited By (20)