The importance of fire–atmosphere coupling and boundary-layer turbulence to wildfire spread
Ruiyu Sun A D , Steven K. Krueger A , Mary Ann Jenkins B , Michael A. Zulauf A and Joseph J. Charney C
A Department of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0110, USA.
B Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, Faculty of Pure and Applied Science, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
C United States Forest Service, North Central Research Station, East Landsing, MI, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(1) 50-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF07072
Submitted: 18 May 2007 Accepted: 26 March 2008 Published: 17 February 2009
The major source of uncertainty in wildfire behavior prediction is the transient behavior of wildfire due to changes in flow in the fire’s environment. The changes in flow are dominated by two factors. The first is the interaction or ‘coupling’ between the fire and the fire-induced flow. The second is the interaction or ‘coupling’ between the fire and the ambient flow driven by turbulence due to wind gustiness and eddies in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). In the present study, coupled wildfire–atmosphere large-eddy simulations of grassland fires are used to examine the differences in the rate of spread and area burnt by grass fires in two types of ABL, a buoyancy-dominated ABL and a roll-dominated ABL. The simulations show how a buoyancy-dominated ABL affects fire spread, how a roll-dominated ABL affects fire spread, and how fire lines interact with these two different ABL flow types. The simulations also show how important are fire–atmosphere couplings or fire-induced circulations to fire line spread compared with the direct impact of the turbulence in the two different ABLs. The results have implications for operational wildfire behavior prediction. Ultimately, it will be important to use techniques that include an estimate of uncertainty in wildfire behavior forecasts.
Additional keywords: atmospheric boundary layer, coupled atmosphere–wildfire numerical model, fire-induced convection, grassland fire, probabilistic wildfire prediction, rate of fire spread.
Albini FA1982Response of free-burning fires to non-steady wind.Combustion Science and Technology29225241doi:10.1080/00102208208923599
Albini FA1983The variability of wind-aided free-burning fires.Combustion Science and Technology31303311doi:10.1080/00102208308923648
Anderson HE, Rothermel RC (1965) Influence of moisture and wind upon the characteristics of free-burning fires. In ‘Tenth Symposium (International) Combustion. Proceedings’. pp. 1009–1019. (Combustion Institute: Pittsburgh, PA)
Anderson DHCatchpole EAde Mestre NJParkes T1982Modelling the spread of grass fires.Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society Series B – Applied Mathematics23451466
Beer T1991The interaction of wind and fire.Boundary-Layer Meteorology54287308doi:10.1007/BF00183958
Butler BW, Forthofer JM, Stratton RD, Finney MA, Bradshaw LS (2005) Fire growth simulations of the Price canyon, Thirtymile and Storm King Mountain fires using high-resolution wind simulation tools and FARSITE. In ‘Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Sixth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology and the 19th InteriorWest Fire Council Meeting’, 25–27 October 2005, Canmore, AB, Canada. (CD-ROM) (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA)
Cheney NPGould JS1995Fire growth in grassland fuels.International Journal of Wildland Fire54237247doi:10.1071/WF9950237
Cheney NPGould JSCatchpole WR1993The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands.International Journal of Wildland Fire313144doi:10.1071/WF9930031
Cheney NPGould JSCatchpole WR1998Prediction of fire spread in grassland.International Journal of Wildland Fire81113doi:10.1071/WF9980001
Clark TLJenkins MACoen JPackham D1996A coupled atmosphere–fire model: role of the convective Froude number and dynamic fingering at the fireline.International Journal of Wildland Fire6177190doi:10.1071/WF9960177
Clark TLCoen JLatham D2004Description of a coupled atmosphere–fire model.International Journal of Wildland Fire134963doi:10.1071/WF03043
Coen JL2005Simulation of the Big Elk Fire using coupled atmosphere–fire modeling.International Journal of Wildland Fire1414959doi:10.1071/WF04047
Crosby JChandler CC1966Get the most from your windspeed observation.Fire Management Today2741213
Deardorff JW1972Numerical investigation of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences2991115doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<0091:NIONAU>2.0.CO;2
Deardorff JW1980Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model.Boundary-Layer Meteorology18495527doi:10.1007/BF00119502
Droegemeier KKWilhelmson RB1987Numerical simulation of thunderstorm outflow dynamics. Part I: Outflow sensitivity experiments and turbulence dynamics.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences4411801210doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1180:NSOTOD>2.0.CO;2
Finney MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator – model, development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-4. (Ogden, UT)
Fons WL1946Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels.Journal of Agricultural Research72393121
Forestry Canadian Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behavior prediction system. Canadian Forest Service, Information Report STX-3. (Ottawa, ON)
Hirsch KH (1996) Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System: user’s guide. Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Center, Special Report 7. (Edmonton, AB)
Jenkins MA2002An examination of the sensitivity of numerically simulated wildfires to low-level atmospheric stability and moisture, and the consequences for the Haines Index.International Journal of Wildland Fire114213232doi:10.1071/WF02006
McArthur AG (1966) Weather and grass fire behaviour. Department of National Development, Forestry and Timber Bureau, Leaflet 100. (Canberra)
Mell WJenkins MAGould JCheney P2007A physically based approach to modelling grassland fires.International Journal of Wildland Fire16122doi:10.1071/WF06002
Moeng C-HSullivan PP1994A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences519991022doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<0999:ACOSAB>2.0.CO;2
Morvan D, Tauleigne V, Dupuy JL (2002) Wind effects on wildfire propagation through a Mediterranean shrub. In ‘Forest Fire Research and Wildland Fire Safety: Proceedings of IV International Conference on Forest Fire Research/2002 Wildland Fire Safety Summit’, 18–23 November 2002, Coimbra, Portugal. (Ed. DX Viegas) (Millpress: Rotterdam)
Pitts WM1991Wind effects on fires.Progress in Energy and Combustion Science1783134doi:10.1016/0360-1285(91)90017-H
Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research paper INT 115. (Ogden, UT)
Stevens DEBretherton CS1996A forward-in-time advection scheme and adaptive multilevel flow solver for nearly incompressible atmospheric flow.Journal of Computational Physics129284295doi:10.1006/JCPH.1996.0250
Stocks BJAlexander MEWotton BMStefner CNFlannigan MDTaylor SW2004Crown fire behavior in a northern jack pine–black spruce forest.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3415481560doi:10.1139/X04-054
Stull RB (1988) ‘An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)
Sun RJenkins MAKrueger SKCharney J2006An evaluation of fire plume properties simulated with the FDS and Clark coupled wildfire model.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3628942908doi:10.1139/X06-138
Taylor SWWotton BMAlexander MEDalrymple GN2004Variation in wind and crown fire behavior in a northern jack pine–black spruce forest.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3415611576doi:10.1139/X04-116
Wicker LJSkamarock WC1998A time-splitting scheme for the elastic equations incorporating second-order Runge–Kutta time differencing.Monthly Weather Review12619921999doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1992:ATSSFT>2.0.CO;2
Zalesak ST1979Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithm for fluids.Journal of Computational Physics31335362doi:10.1016/0021-9991(79)90051-2
Zulauf MA (2001) Modeling the effects of boundary layer circulations generated by cumulus convection and leads on large-scale surface fluxes. PhD dissertation, University of Utah.