International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relative importance of fuel management, ignition management and weather for area burned: evidence from five landscape–fire–succession models

Geoffrey J. Cary A B H , Mike D. Flannigan C , Robert E. Keane D , Ross A. Bradstock B E , Ian D. Davies A , James M. Lenihan F , Chao Li G , Kimberley A. Logan C and Russell A. Parsons D

A The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way (Building 48), College of Medicine, Biology & The Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

B Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, Level 5, 340 Albert St., East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia.

C Canadian Forest Service, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.

D USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 W Broadway St., Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

E Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 1481, Australia.

F USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

G Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320-122nd St., Edmonton, AB, T6H 3S5, Canada.

H Corresponding author. Email: geoffrey.cary@anu.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 18(2) 147-156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF07085
Submitted: 27 June 2007  Accepted: 17 June 2008   Published: 3 April 2009

Abstract

The behaviour of five landscape fire models (CAFÉ, FIRESCAPE, LAMOS(HS), LANDSUM and SEM-LAND) was compared in a standardised modelling experiment. The importance of fuel management approach, fuel management effort, ignition management effort and weather in determining variation in area burned and number of edge pixels burned (a measure of potential impact on assets adjacent to fire-prone landscapes) was quantified for a standardised modelling landscape. Importance was measured as the proportion of variation in area or edge pixels burned explained by each factor and all interactions among them. Weather and ignition management were consistently more important for explaining variation in area burned than fuel management approach and effort, which were found to be statistically unimportant. For the number of edge pixels burned, weather and ignition management were generally more important than fuel management approach and effort. Increased ignition management effort resulted in decreased area burned in all models and decreased number of edge pixels burned in three models. The findings demonstrate that year-to-year variation in weather and the success of ignition management consistently prevail over the effects of fuel management on area burned in a range of modelled ecosystems.

Additional keywords: CAFÉ, fire management, FIRESCAPE, LAMOS, LANDSUM, model comparison, SEM-LAND, simulation modelling.


References

Bessie WCJohnson EA1995The relative importance of fuels and weather on fire behaviour in subalpine forests.Ecology76747762doi:10.2307/1939341

Bradstock RAGill AM2001Living with fire and biodiversity at the urban edge: in search of a sustainable solution to the human protection problem in southern Australia.Journal of Mediterranean Ecology2179195

Bradstock RABedward MKenny BJScott J1998aSpatially explicit simulation of the effect of prescribed burning on fire regimes and plant extinctions in shrublands typical of south-eastern Australia.Biological Conservation868395
doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00170-5

Bradstock RAGill AMKenny BJScott J1998bBushfire risk at the urban interface estimated from historical weather records: consequences for the use of prescribed fire in the Sydney region of south-eastern Australia.Journal of Environmental Management52259271doi:10.1006/JEMA.1997.0177

Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill AM (Eds) (2002) ‘Flammable Australia: the Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Bradstock RABedward MGill AMCohn JS2005Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals.Wildlife Research32409423doi:10.1071/WR02114

Bradstock RABedward MCohn JS2006The modelled effects of differing fire management strategies on the conifer Callitris verrucosa, within semi-arid mallee vegetation in Australia.Journal of Applied Ecology43281292doi:10.1111/J.1365-2664.2006.01142.X

Bugmann HKMYan XDSykes MTMartin PLindner MDesanker PVCumming SG1996A comparison of forest gap models: model structure and behaviour.Climatic Change34289313doi:10.1007/BF00224640

Byram GM (1959) Combustion of forest fuels. In ‘Forest Fire: Control and Use’. (Ed. KP Davis) pp. 61–80. (McGraw-Hill: New York)

Cary GJ (2002) Importance of a changing climate for fire regimes in Australia. In ‘Flammable Australia: the Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent’. (Eds R Bradstock, AM Gill, J Williams) pp. 26–46. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Cary GJ2005Research priorities arising from the 2002–2003 bushfire season in south-eastern Australia.Australian Forestry68104111

Cary GJ, Banks JCG (1999) Fire regime sensitivity to global climate change: an Australian perspective. In ‘Biomass Burning and its Inter-Relationship with the Climate System’. (Eds J Innes, M Verstraete, M Beniston) pp. 233–246. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, the Netherlands)

Cary GJ, Bradstock RA (2003) Sensitivity of fire regimes to management. In ‘Australia Burning: Fire Ecology, Policy and Management Issues’. (Eds G Cary, D Lindenmayer, S Dovers) pp. 65–81. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Cary GJKeane RKGardner RHLavorel SFlannigan MDavies IDLi CLenihan JMRupp TSMouillot F2006Comparison of the sensitivity of landscape-fire succession models to variation in terrain, fuel pattern, climate and weather.Landscape Ecology21121137
doi:10.1007/S10980-005-7302-9

Crutzen PJ, Goldammer JG (1993) ‘Fire in the Environment: the Ecological, Atmospheric and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires.’ (Wiley: New York)

Cumming SG2005Effective fire suppression in boreal forests.Canadian Journal of Forest Research35772786doi:10.1139/X04-174

Dale VHJoyce LAMcNulty SNeilson RPAyres MPFlannigan MDHanson PJIrland LCLugo AEPeterson CJSimberloff DSwanson FJStocks BJWotton BM2001Forest disturbances and climate change.Bioscience51723734doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2

Fernandes PMBotelho HS2003A review of prescribed burning effectiveness.International Journal of Wildland Fire12117128doi:10.1071/WF02042

Finney MA2001Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior.Forest Science47219228

Finney MA2007A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations.International Journal of Wildland Fire16702711
doi:10.1071/WF06063

Flannigan MD, Wotton BM (2001) Climate, weather and area burned. In ‘Forest Fires: Behaviour and Ecological Effects’. (Eds E Johnson, K Miyanishi) pp. 335–357. (Kluwer Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Flannigan MDLogan KAAmiro BDSkinner WRStocks BJ2005Future area burned in Canada.Climatic Change72116doi:10.1007/S10584-005-5935-Y

Fried JSGilless JKRiley WJMoody TJSimon de Blas CHayhoe KMoritz MStephens STom M2008Predicting the effect of climate change on wildfire behavior and initial attack success.Climatic Change87Suppl. 1251264doi:10.1007/S10584-007-9360-2

Gardner RHMilne BTTurner MG1987Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern.Landscape Ecology11928doi:10.1007/BF02275262

Hammer RBRadeloff VCFried JSStewart SI2007Wildland–urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon and Washington.International Journal of Wildland Fire16255265doi:10.1071/WF05077

Hammill KABradstock RA2006Remote sensing of fire severity in the Blue Mountains: influence of vegetation type and inferring fire intensity.International Journal of Wildland Fire15213226doi:10.1071/WF05051

Hély CFlannigan MBergeron YMcRae D2001Role of vegetation and weather on fire behaviour in the Canadian mixedwood boreal forest using two fire behaviour prediction systems.Canadian Journal of Forest Research31430441doi:10.1139/CJFR-31-3-430

Keane REParsons RHessburg P2002Estimating historical range and variation of landscape patch dynamics: limitations of the simulation approach.Ecological Modelling1512949doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00470-7

Keane RECary GJParsons R2003Using simulation to map fire regimes: an evaluation of approaches, strategies, and limitations.International Journal of Wildland Fire12309322doi:10.1071/WF03017

Keane RECary GJDavies IDFlannigan MDGardner RHLavorel SLennihan JMLi CRupp TS2004A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics.Ecological Modelling179327doi:10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2004.03.015

Keane RE, Holsinger L, Pratt S (2006) Simulating historical landscape dynamics using the landscape fire succession model LANDSUM version 4.0. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-171CD. (Fort Collins, CO)

Keeley JEFotheringham CJMorais M1999Reexamining fire suppression impacts on brushland fire regimes.Science28418291832doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.284.5421.1829

King KJCary GJBradstock RAChapman JPyrke AMarsden-Smedley JB2006Simulation of prescribed burning strategies in south-west Tasmania, Australia: effects on unplanned fires, fire regimes, and ecological management values.International Journal of Wildland Fire15527540doi:10.1071/WF05076

Krebs C (2003) Observations on fire ecology. In ‘Australia Burning: Fire Ecology, Policy and Management Issues’. (Eds G Cary, D Lindenmayer, S Dovers) pp. 229–235. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Lavorel S, Davies ID, Noble IR (2000) LAMOS: a LAndscape MOdelling Shell. In ‘Landscape Fire Modelling – Challenges and Opportunities’. (Eds B Hawkes, M Flannigan) Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-371, pp. 25–28. (Edmonton, AB)

Li C2000Reconstruction of natural fire regimes through ecological modelling.Ecological Modelling134129144doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00290-8

Li CFlanningan MDCorns IGW2000Influence of potential climate change on forest landscape dynamics of west central Alberta.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3019051912doi:10.1139/CJFR-30-12-1905

Minnich RAChou YH1997Wildland fire patch dynamics in the chaparral of southern California and northern Baja California.International Journal of Wildland Fire7221248doi:10.1071/WF9970221

Miyanishi KJohnson EA2001Comment – A reexamination of the effects of fire suppression in the boreal forest.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3114621466doi:10.1139/CJFR-31-8-1462

Moritz MAStephens SL2008Fire and sustainability: considerations for California’s altered future climate.Climatic Change87Suppl. 1265271doi:10.1007/S10584-007-9361-1

Piñol JBeven KViegas DX2005Modelling the effects of fire-exclusion and prescribed fire on wildfire size in Mediterranean ecosystems.Ecological Modelling183397409doi:10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2004.09.001

Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) ‘Introduction to Wildland Fire.’ 2nd edn. (Wiley: New York)

Radeloff VCHammer RBStewart SIFried JSHolcomb SSMcKeefry JF2005The wildland–urban interface in the United States.Ecological Applications15799805doi:10.1890/04-1413

Richardson CW1981Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation.Water Resources Research17182190doi:10.1029/WR017I001P00182

Shang BZHe HSCrow TRShifley SR2004Fuel load reductions and fire risk in central hardwood forests of the United States: a spatial simulation study.Ecological Modelling18089102doi:10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2004.01.020

Swetnam TW1993Fire history and climate change in giant sequoia groves.Science262885889doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.262.5135.885

Ward PCTithecott AGWotton BM2001Reply – A reexamination of the effects of fire suppression in the boreal forest.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3114671480doi:10.1139/CJFR-31-8-1467



Export Citation Cited By (54)