Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The transferability of a dNBR-derived model to predict burn severity across 10 wildland fires in western Canada

Nicholas O. Soverel A , Nicholas C. Coops A E , Daniel D. B. Perrakis B , Lori D. Daniels C and Sarah E. Gergel D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest Resource Management, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Email: nsoverel@gmail.com

B Western and Northern Service Centre, Parks Canada, 1550, 635 8 Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 3M3, Canada. Email: dan.perrakis@pc.gc.ca

C Tree-Ring Laboratory at UBC, Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, 2171984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada. Email: daniels@geog.ubc.ca

D Department of Forest Sciences and Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Email: sarah.gergel@ubc.ca

E Corresponding author. Email: nicholas.coops@ubc.ca

International Journal of Wildland Fire 20(4) 518-531 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF10081
Submitted: 17 July 2010  Accepted: 17 September 2010   Published: 20 June 2011

Abstract

Wildfire is a complex and critical ecological process that is an integral component of western Canadian terrestrial ecosystems. Therefore, Canadian land management agencies such as Parks Canada require detailed burn severity data for the monitoring and managing of both wildland and prescribed fires. In order to gather this type of information for our study, the acquisition of Landsat imagery was acquired and the differenced Normalised Burn Ratio was computed, a technique that has been shown to be sensitive to field measured burn severity. It is less known if this technique can be transferred and extrapolated over space and time so as to make routine and operational application of the approach feasible. To answer this question, we combined burn severity data from 10 fires across western Canada to test the transferability of an overall model as well as one stratified by land cover and ecozone. Finally, we tested the statistical benefit of incorporating pre- and post-fire data directly into the statistical model using transformations of the remote sensing imagery. Our results indicated that an overall differenced Normalised Burn Ratio derived model successfully estimated burn severity for the majority of fires in the study, which supports its transferability across multiple western Canadian landscapes.

Additional keywords: Landsat, Parks Canada, remote sensing, tasselled cap transformation (TCT).


References

Agee JK (1993) ‘Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests.’ (Island Press: Covelo, CA)

Avery TE, Berlin GL (1992) ‘Fundamentals of Remote Sensing and Airphoto Interpretation.’ (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ)

Balshi MS, McGuire AD, Duffy P, Flannigan MD, Walsh J, Melillo J (2009) Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach. Global Change Biology 15, 578–600.
Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) ‘Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control.’ (Holden-Day: London, UK)

Burton PJ, Parisien M, Hicke JA, Hall RJ, Freeburn JT (2008) Large fires as agents of ecological diversity in the North American boreal forest. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 754–767.
Large fires as agents of ecological diversity in the North American boreal forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chander G, Markham B (2003) Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and post-calibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41, 2674–2677.
Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and post-calibration dynamic ranges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chavez PS (1989) Radiometric calibration of Landsat Thematic Mapper multispectral images. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 9, 1285–1294.

Chuvieco E, Congleton RG (1988) Mapping and inventory of forest fires from digital processing of TM data. Geocarto International 3, 41–53.
Mapping and inventory of forest fires from digital processing of TM data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cocke EA, Fulé PZ, Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 189–198.
Comparison of burn severity assessments using the Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cohen WB, Spies TA, Fiorella M (1995) Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16, 721–746.
Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crist EP, Cicone RC (1984) A physically based transformation of Thematic Mapper data – the TM tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing GE-22, 256–263.
A physically based transformation of Thematic Mapper data – the TM tasseled cap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

DeBano LF, Neary DG, Ffolliott PF (1998) ‘Fire’s Effects on Ecosystems.’ (Wiley: New York)

DeSantis A, Chuvieco E (2007) Burn severity estimation from remotely sensed data: performance of simulation versus empirical models. Remote Sensing of Environment 108, 422–435.
Burn severity estimation from remotely sensed data: performance of simulation versus empirical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ecological Stratification Working Group (1996) National ecological framework for Canada. (Agriculture and Agric.-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of Environment Directorate: Ottawa) Available at http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/ecostrat/intro.html [Verified 11 May 2011]

Elvidge CD (1990) Visible and near-infrared reflectance characteristics of dry plant materials. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11, 1775–1795.
Visible and near-infrared reflectance characteristics of dry plant materials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Epting J, Verbyla D (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment 96, 328–339.
Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

ESRI (2010) ‘ArcMap Ver. 9.2.’ (Environmental Systems Research Institute: Redlands, CA)

Fischer WC, Clayton BD (1983) Fire ecology of Montana forest habitat types east of the continental divide. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-141. (Ogden, UT)

Flannigan MD, Stocks BJ, Turetsky M, Wotton M (2009) Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Global Change Biology 15, 549–560.
Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

French NHF, Kasischke ES, Hall RJ, Murphy KA, Verbyla DL, Hoy EE, Allen JL (2008) Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 443–462.
Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gillett NP, Weaver AJ (2004) Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires. Geophysical Research Letters 31, L18211
Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall RJ, Freeburn JT, de Groot WJ, Pritchard JM, Lynham TJ, Landry R (2008) Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from western Canada boreal fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 476–489.
Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from western Canada boreal fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Halofsky JE, Hibbs DE (2009) Relationships among indices of fire severity in riparian zones. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 584–593.
Relationships among indices of fire severity in riparian zones.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang C, Wylie B, Yang L, Homer C, Zylstra G (2002) Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23, 1741–1748.
Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

ITT (2010) ‘ENVI User’s Manual. Ver. 4.4.’ (ITT Visual Information Solutions: Boulder, CO)

Jin S, Sader SA (2005) Comparison of time series tasseled cap wetness and the normalized difference moisture index in detecting forest disturbances. Remote Sensing of Environment 94, 364–372.
Comparison of time series tasseled cap wetness and the normalized difference moisture index in detecting forest disturbances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson EA (1992) ‘Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forest.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York)

Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR, Ottmar RD, French NHF, Hoy EE, Kane ES (2008) Evaluation of the Composite Burn Index for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 515–526.
Evaluation of the Composite Burn Index for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index, and remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Index. In ‘FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System’. (Eds DC Lutes, RE Keane, JF Caratti, CH Key, NC Benson, S Sutherland, LJ Gangi) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD: LA1–51. (Ogden, UT)

Klenner W, Walton R, Arsenault A, Kremsater L (2008) Dry forests in the southern interior of British Columbia: historic disturbances and implications for restoration and management. Forest Ecology and Management 256, 1711–1722.
Dry forests in the southern interior of British Columbia: historic disturbances and implications for restoration and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kuzera K, Rogan J, Eastman JR (2005) Monitoring vegetation regeneration and deforestation using change vector analysis: Mt St Helens area. In ‘ASPRS 2005 Annual Conference’, 7–11 March 2005, Baltimore, MD. Available at http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~kuzera/kuzera_rogan_eastman_1.pdf [Verified 30 May 2011]

Larsen CPS (1997) Spatial and temporal variations in boreal forest fire frequency in northern Alberta. Journal of Biogeography 24, 663–673.
Spatial and temporal variations in boreal forest fire frequency in northern Alberta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE, Benson NC (2006) Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 319–345.
Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

López García MJ, Caselles V (1991) Mapping burns and natural reforestation using Thematic Mapper data. Geocarto International 6, 31–37.
Mapping burns and natural reforestation using Thematic Mapper data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lyon LJ, Stickney PF (1976) Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In ‘Proceedings 14th Tall Timbers fire Ecology Conference and Fire and Land’, 8–10 October 1974, Missoula, MT. pp. 355–375. (Tall Timbers Research Station: Tallahassee, FL)

Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ration (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment 109, 66–80.
Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ration (dNBR).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller JD, Knapp EE, Key CH, Skinner CN, Isbell CJ, Creasy RM, Sherlock JW (2009) Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 645–656.
Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morgan P, Neuenschwander LF (1988) Shrub response to high- and low-severity burns. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 3, 5–9.

NASA (1998) Landsat 7 Science Data Users’ Handbook. Landsat Project Science Office, NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. (Greenbelt, MD) Available at http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/pdfs/Landsat7_Handbook.pdf [Verified 11 May 2011]

Podur J, Martell DL, Knight K (2002) Statistical quality control analysis of forest fire activity in Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 195–205.
Statistical quality control analysis of forest fire activity in Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rogan J, Yool SR (2001) Mapping fire-induced vegetation depletion in the Peloncillo Mountains, Arizona and New Mexico. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22, 3101–3121.
Mapping fire-induced vegetation depletion in the Peloncillo Mountains, Arizona and New Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ryan KC (2002) Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. Silva Fennica 36, 13–39.

Ryan KC, Noste NV (1985) Evaluating prescribed fires. In ‘Proceedings – Symposium and Workshop on Wilderness Fire’, 15–18 November 1983, Missoula, MT. (Eds JE Lotan, BM Kilgore, WC Fischer, RW Mutch) USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-182, pp. 230–238. (Ogden, UT)

Snee RD (1977) Validation of regression models: methods and examples. Technometrics 19, 415–428.
Validation of regression models: methods and examples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stocks BJ, Mason JA, Todd JB, Bosch EM, Wotton BM, Amiro BD, Flannigan MD, Hirsch KG, Logan KA, Martell DL, Skinner WR (2003) Large forest fires in Canada 1959–1997. Journal of Geophysical Research 107, 1–12.

Tande GF (1979) Fire history and vegetation pattern of coniferous forests in Jasper National Park, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 57, 1912–1931.
Fire history and vegetation pattern of coniferous forests in Jasper National Park, Alberta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner MG, Romme WH, Tinker DB (2003) Surprises and lessons from the 1988 Yellowstone Fires. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 351–358.
Surprises and lessons from the 1988 Yellowstone Fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Wagner CE, Finney MA, Heathcott M (2006) Historical fire cycles in the Canadian Rocky Mountain parks. Forest Science 52, 704–717.

van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR, Key CH (2004) Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 397–408.
Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weir JMH, Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2000) Fire frequency and the spatial age mosaic of the mixed-wood boreal forest in western Canada. Ecological Applications 10, 1162–1177.
Fire frequency and the spatial age mosaic of the mixed-wood boreal forest in western Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wulder MA, Kakun RS, Kurz WA, White JC (2004) Estimating time since forest harvest using segmented Landsat ETM+ imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 93, 179–187.
Estimating time since forest harvest using segmented Landsat ETM+ imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wulder MA, White JC, Bentz BJ, Ebata T (2006) Augmenting the existing survey hierarchy for mountain pine beetle red attack damage with satellite remotely sensed data. Forestry Chronicle 82, 187–202.

Wulder MA, White JC, Magnussen S, McDonald S (2007) Validation of a large area land cover product using purpose-acquired airborne video. Remote Sensing of Environment 106, 480–491.
Validation of a large area land cover product using purpose-acquired airborne video.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wulder MA, White JC, Cranny M, Hall RJ, Luther JE, Beaudoin A, Goodenough DG, Dechka JA (2008a) Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: completion of the EOSD land cover project. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 34, 563–584.

Wulder MA, White JC, Han T, Coops NC, Cardille JA, Holland T, Grills D (2008b) Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 2: national forest fragmentation and pattern. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 34, 563–584.

Wulder MA, White JC, Alvarez F, Han T, Rogan J, Hawkes B (2009) Characterizing boreal forest wildfire with multi-temporal Landsat and LIDAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 1540–1555.
Characterizing boreal forest wildfire with multi-temporal Landsat and LIDAR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhu Z, Key CH, Ohlen D, Benson NC (2006) Evaluate sensitivities of burn-severity mapping algorithms for different ecosystems and fire histories in the United States. Available at http://www.firescience.gov/projects/01-1-4-12/project/01-1-4-12_final_report.pdf [Verified 11 May 2011]