Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics

Barbara A. Strom A and Peter Z. Fulé A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Forestry and Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: pete.fule@nau.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 16(1) 128-138 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06051
Published: 20 February 2007

Abstract

The 2002 Rodeo–Chediski fire, the largest wildfire in south-western USA history, burned over treated stands and adjacent untreated stands in the Apache–Sitgreaves National Forest, setting the stage for a natural experiment testing the effectiveness of fuel reduction treatments under conditions of extraordinary fire severity. In seven pairs of treated–untreated study sites measured 2 years after the fire, thinning was strongly associated with reduced burn severity. Treated areas had more live trees, greater survival, and reduced fire intensity as indicated by crown base height and bole char. Ponderosa pine regeneration was patchy but more dense in treated areas. We assessed decade- to century-long effects of the pre-wildfire fuel treatments using the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS). Differences between treated and untreated areas were projected to persist for several decades after the fire in terms of stand structure characteristics and for at least 100 years in terms of species composition, with ponderosa pine making up ~60% of basal area in treated areas but only 35% in untreated areas. Future ecosystem development may take the trajectory of recovery to a ponderosa pine/Gambel oak forest or of a shift to an alternative stable state such as an oak-dominated shrubfield, with untreated areas more apt to undergo a shift to a shrubfield state. Current management decisions about fuel treatments have multi-century legacies.

Additional keywords: Arizona, Forest Vegetation Simulator, fuel reduction Rodeo–Chediski fire.


Acknowledgements

Thanks to Linda Wadleigh, Chad Hoffman, Gayle Richardson, and staff of the Apache–Sitgreaves National Forest for assistance in selecting the study sites and providing data on treatments and fire effects. Staff and students of the Ecological Restoration Institute supported field and laboratory work, especially Matt Tuten, Mark Daniels, and Amanda Kuenzi. Jim Youtz sparked interest in fuel treatment effects on fire behaviour during the Rodeo–Chediski burn. This research was supported by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Joint Venture Agreement #03-JV-11221615-153. Thanks to Carolyn Sieg and Carl Edminster. Two anonymous reviewers and an editor provided helpful comments.


References


Agee JK , Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management  211, 83–96.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Anderson MJ (2004) ‘DISTLM v. 5: A FORTRAN Computer Program to Calculate a Distance-Based Multivariate Analysis for a Linear Mode.’ (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand)

Anderson MJ , Robinson J (2001) Permutation tests for linear models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics  43, 75–88.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Barger RL, Ffolliott PF (1972) Physical characteristics and utilisation of major woodland tree species in Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper RM-83. (Fort Collins, CO)

Barton AM (2002) Intense wildfire in south-eastern Arizona: transformation of a Madrean oak–pine forest to oak woodland. Forest Ecology and Management  165, 205–212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Blatner KA, Govett RL (1988) Ponderosa pine lumber market. In ‘Ponderosa Pine: the Species and its Management. Symposium Proceedings 29 September–1 October 1987, Spokane, WA’. (Compilers DM Baumgartner, JE Lotan) pp. 7–9. (Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: Pullman, WA)

Brose P , Wade D (2002) Potential fire behavior in pine flatwood forests following three different fuel reduction techniques. Forest Ecology and Management  163, 71–84.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-16. (Ogden, UT)

Chambers CL , Mast JN (2005) Ponderosa pine snag dynamics and cavity excavation following wildfire in northern Arizona. Forest Ecology and Management  216, 227–240.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Cram DS, Baker TT (2003) Annual report: inventory and classification of wildland fire effects in silviculturally treated vs untreated forest stands of New Mexico and Arizona. (College of Agriculture and Home Economics, New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM)

Deeming JE (1990) Effects of prescribed fire on wildfire occurrence and severity. In ‘Natural and Prescribed Fire in Pacific Northwest Forests’. (Eds JD Walstad, SR Radosevich, DV Sandberg) pp. 95–104. (Oregon State University Press: Corvallis, OR)

Dixon GE comp. (2003) Essential FVS: A user’s guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center. (Fort Collins, CO)

Edminster CB, Mowrer HT, Mathiasen RL, Schuler TM, Olsen WK, Hawksworth FG (1991) GENGYM: a variable density stand table projection system calibrated for mixed conifer and ponderosa pine stands in the Southwest. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Paper RM-297. (Fort Collins, CO)

Ffolliott PF, Clary WP, Davis JR (1968) Some characteristics of the forest floor under ponderosa pine in Arizona. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note RM-127. (Fort Collins, CO)

Fiedler CE, Keegan CEIII, Robertson SH, Morgan TA, Woodall CW, Chmelik JT (2002) A strategic assessment of fire hazard in New Mexico. Final report to the Joint Fire Science Program. (Boise, ID)

Finney MA (2001) Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behaviour. Forest Science  47, 219–228.
Foxx TS (1996) Vegetation succession after the La Mesa fire at Bandelier National Monument. In ‘Fire Effects in Southwestern Forests: Proceedings of the 2nd La Mesa Fire Symposium’. (Ed. CD Allen) pp. 47–69. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RM-GTR-286. (Fort Collins, CO)

Fulé PZ, Garcia-Arevalo A , Covington WW (2000) Effects of an intense wildfire in a Mexican oak–pine forest. Forest Science  46, 52–61.
Hawksworth FG (1977) The 6-Class Dwarf Mistletoe Rating System. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM–48. (Fort Collins, CO)

He HS, Mladenoff DJ , Gustafson EJ (2002) Study of landscape change under forest harvesting and climate warming-induced fire disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management  155, 257–270.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Linhart YB (1988) Ecological and evolutionary studies of ponderosa pine in the Rocky Mountains. In ‘Ponderosa Pine: The Species and its Management. Symposium Proceedings, 29 September–1 October 1987, Spokane, WA’. (Compilers DM Baumgartner, JE Lotan) pp. 77–89. (Washington State University, Cooperative Extension: Pullman, WA)

Martinson EJ, Omi PN (2003) Performance of fuel treatments subjected to wildfires. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-29. (Fort Collins, CO)

McHugh CW , Kolb TE (2003) Ponderosa pine mortality following fire in northern Arizona. International Journal of Wildland Fire  12, 7–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Omi PN, Martinson EJ (2002) Effect of fuels treatment on wildfire severity. Final report to the Joint Fire Science Program Governing Board, Western Forest Fire Research Center, Colorado State University. (Fort Collins, CO)

Petraitis PS , Latham RE (1999) The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states. Ecology  80, 429–442.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Hardy CC, Hann WJ, Bunnell DL (2002) Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-87. (Fort Collins, CO)

Stephens SL (1998) Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatment on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management  105, 21–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1968) ‘An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago)

Swetnam TW , Betancourt JL (1990) Fire–Southern Oscillation relations in the southwestern United States. Science  249, 1017–1020.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Thomas JW (1979) Wildlife habitats in managed forests in the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service agriculture handbook No. 553. (Washington, DC)

USDA Forest Service (2002) Rodeo–Chediski fire effects summary report: Apache–Sitgreaves National Forests. (USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC)

van Wagtendonk JW (1996) Use of a deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options’. pp. 1155–1166. (Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California: Davis, CA)

Vihanek RE, Ottmar RD (1993) When logged units burn in a wildfire, does slash treatment mitigate effects? In ‘Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, October 26–28, 1993. Jekyll Island, GA’. SAF Publication 94-02. pp. 709–714. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

Wagle RF , Eakle TW (1979) A controlled burn reduces the impact of a subsequent wildfire in a Ponderosa pine vegetation type. Forest Science  25, 123–129.


Waltz AEM, Fulé PZ, Covington WW , Moore MM (2003) Diversity in ponderosa pine forest structure following ecological restoration treatments. Forest Science  49, 885–900.


Weatherspoon CP , Skinner CN (1995) An assessment of factors associated with damage to tree crowns from the 1987 wildfires in northern California. Forest Science  41, 430–451.


Weaver H (1951) Fire as an ecological factor in the southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Forestry  49, 93–98.


Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR , Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science  313, 940–943.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |