Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 1. Breed and fixed effects for birth and weaning weight of first-cross lambs, gestation length, and reproduction of base ewes

N. M. Fogarty A F , V. M. Ingham A , A. R. Gilmour A , L. J. Cummins C , G. M. Gaunt D , J. Stafford E , J. E. Hocking Edwards E and R. G. Banks F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

C Department of Primary Industries, Primary Industries Research, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.

D South Australian Research & Development Institute, Struan Research Centre, Naracoorte, SA 5271, Australia.

E Meat and Livestock Australia, Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

F Corresponding author. Email: neal.fogarty@agric.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(5) 443-453 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04221
Submitted: 14 September 2004  Accepted: 3 March 2005   Published: 31 May 2005

Abstract

This is the first paper in a series that reports on a national maternal sire central progeny test program (MCPT) to evaluate the genetic variation for economically important production traits in first- and second-cross progeny of maternal and dual purpose (meat and wool) sires and the scope for genetic improvement. The MCPT program also provides direct linkages between breeds that will contribute information for across-breed genetic evaluation. Crossbred progeny by 91 sires from more than 7 maternal breeds (including Border Leicester, East Friesian, Finnsheep, Coopworth, White Suffolk, Corriedale, and Booroola Leicester) at 3 sites over 3 years with 3 link sires in common at each site and year were evaluated in this study. National estimated breeding values for the sires that were entered by industry breeders indicated that there was some selection for weight, but not other traits and the sires were generally representative of the maternal genetics available to the industry. There were 8377 base Merino and Corriedale ewes artificially inseminated with thawed-frozen semen from the 91 sires and 8193 crossbred lambs born and 6117 lambs weaned. Mixed model analyses of birth and weaning weight, lamb survival, and gestation length as well as fertility, litter size, and lamb weaning rate of the base ewes are reported. Sire breed was significant for birth weight (with a range of 4.0–4.4 kg at an average litter size of 1.8) and weaning weight (19.6–22.5 kg), as well as lamb survival (70–79%) and gestation length (147.1–150.3 days). Birth/rearing type was significant for all traits. Males were significantly heavier than females at birth and weaning, although there was no sex difference for lamb survival or gestation length when birthweight was included in the model. Pregnancy rate from the artificially inseminated base ewes varied from 40 to 84% at the 3 locations in the various years. Sire breed was significant for the number of lambs weaned per ewe lambing, but not for fetal number or litter size born. There were also significant differences in performance due to the source of the base ewes at each site.

Additional keywords: progeny test, lamb growth, maternal, Border Leicester.


Acknowledgments

The MCPT is run by the NSW Department of Primary Industries, the Department of Primary Industries Victoria, and the South Australian Research and Development Institute with the generous financial support of Meat and Livestock Australia. Commonwealth funding provided through the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre is also acknowledged. We also gratefully thank the many other scientists and technical and other support staff at the Centre for Sheep Meat Development, Cowra; Orange Agricultural Institute; the Pastoral and Veterinary Institute, Hamilton; Rutherglen Research Institute; and Struan Research Centre who have contributed to and supported the project over several years. We especially acknowledge the contributions of Jayce Morgan, Lynette McLeod, Kelly Lees, Tony Markham, Murray Arnold, Kerrie Groves, Trevor Pollard, Greg Seymour, Taffy Phillips, Paul Curran, Jack Rowe, Tamara Starbuck, Liz Abraham, Elke Hocking, and Nick Edwards. The support of ram breeders who entered sires is also greatly appreciated as well as the Advisory Group of Lynton Arney, Sandy Cameron, Don Peglar, John Keiller, Charlie Prell, and Robert Mortimer. Dr Daniel Brown is thanked for providing information from the LAMBPLAN analyses. Dr Rob Woolaston made valuable comments on the manuscript.


References


Atkins KD, Gilmour AR (1981) The comparative productivity of five ewe breeds 4. Growth and carcase characteristics of purebred and crossbred lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21, 172–178.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Atkins KD, Thompson JM (1979) Carcass characteristics of heavyweight lambs 1. Growth and carcass measurements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 1197–1205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Banks RG (1994) LAMBPLAN: Genetic evaluation for the Australian lamb industry. ‘Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’. Guelph, Canada..


Banks RG (2002) An integrated system of genetic evaluation and improvement tools for Australian sheep breeders. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 359–365. open url image1

Bradford GE, Hart R, Quirke JF, Land RB (1972) Genetic control of the duration of gestation in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 30, 459–463.
PubMed |
open url image1

Brown DJ, Tier B, Reverter A, Banks R, Graser HU (2000) OVIS: A multiple trait breeding value estimation program for genetic evaluation of sheep. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 48, 285–297. open url image1

Cameron ND, Drury DJ (1985) Comparison of terminal sire breeds for growth and carcass traits in crossbred lambs. Animal Production 40, 315–322. open url image1

Cloete SWP, Scholtz AJ (1998) Lamb survival in relation to lambing and neonatal behaviour in medium wool Merino lines divergently selected for multiple rearing ability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 801–811.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dwyer CM (2003) Behavioural development in the neonatal lamb: effect of maternal and birth-related factors. Theriogenology 59, 1027–1050.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB, Brown HE, Simm G (1996) Effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing ease and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8, 1123–1129. open url image1

Eppleston J, Maxwell WMC (1995) Sources of variation in the reproductive performance of ewes inseminated with frozen-thawed ram semen by laparoscopy. Theriogenology 43, 777–788.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Evans G (1991) Application of reproductive technology to the Australian livestock industries. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 3, 627–650. open url image1

Fogarty NM (1972) Crossbreeding for lamb production. 1. Survival and growth of first cross lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 12, 234–239.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fogarty NM, Cummins LJ, Gaunt G, Hocking Edwards J, Edwards N (2002) Progeny testing maternal sires in the Australian lamb industry. ‘Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’. Montpellier, France.. (CD-ROM, Communication No. 02–04)


Fogarty NM, Cummins LJ, Gaunt G, Hocking Edwards J, Edwards N, Lees K, Morgan JE (2001) Opportunities to exploit genetic variation among maternal sires in the lamb industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 123–126. open url image1

Fogarty NM, Hopkins DL, van de Ven R (2000) Lamb production from diverse genotypes 1. Lamb growth and survival and ewe performance. Animal Science 70, 135–145. open url image1

Fogarty NM, McLeod L, Morgan JE (2003) Variation among crossbred ewes in lamb productivity and profit on a feed unit basis. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 314–317. open url image1

Freking BA, Leymaster KA, Young LD (2000) Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: I. Effects of ram breed on productivity of ewes of two crossbred populations. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1422–1429.
PubMed |
open url image1

Gilmour, AR , Gogel, BJ , Cullis, BR , Welham, SJ ,  and  Thompson, R (2002). ‘ASReml user guide release 1.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Hill JR, Thompson JA, Perkins NR (1998) Factors affecting pregnancy rates following laparoscopic insemination of 28,447 Merino ewes under commercial conditions: a survey. Theriogenology 49, 697–709.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Hinch GN, Lynch JJ, Nolan JV, Leng RA, Bindon BM, Piper LR (1996) Supplementation of high fecundity Border Leicester × Merino ewes with a high protein feed: its effect on lamb survival. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 129–136.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hodge R, Beard K (1981) Comparison of the progeny of Peppin and Bungaree Merino ewes when mated to Border Leicester rams. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21, 280–286.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Johnston SD, Steen RWJ, Kilpatrick DJ, Lowe DE, Chestnut DMB (1999) A comparison of sires of Suffolk and Dutch Texel breeds and ewes of Greyface, Suffolk, Cheviot and Dutch Texel breeds in terms of food intake, prolificacy and lamb growth rates. Animal Science 68, 567–575. open url image1

Kleemann DO, Ponzoni RW, Stafford JE, Cutten IN, Grimson RJ (1985) Growth and carcase characteristics of the South Australian Merino and its crosses with the Booroola and Trangie Fertility Merino. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 750–757.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Knight TW, Lynch PR, Hall DRH, Hockey H-UP (1988) Indication of factors contributing to the improved lamb survival in Marshall Romney sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 259–271. open url image1

Safari A, Fogarty NM (2003) Genetic parameters for sheep production traits: estimates from the literature. Technical Bulletin 49, NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia, http://www.sheep.crc.org.au/articles.php3?rc=145

Scales GH, Bray AR, Baird DB, O’Connell D, Knight TL (2000) Effect of sire breed on growth, carcase and wool characteristics of lambs born to Merino ewes in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 93–100. open url image1

Wolf BT, Smith C, Sales DI (1980) Growth and carcass composition in the crossbred progeny of six terminal sire breeds of sheep. Animal Production 31, 307–313. open url image1