Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system

R. Polkinghorne; R. Watson; J. M. Thompson; D. W. Pethick

doi:10.1071/EA07175

RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Previous Next Contents Vol 48(11)

Current usage and future development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) grading system

R. Polkinghorne ^A ^E , R. Watson ^B , J. M. Thompson ^C and D. W. Pethick ^D

+ Author Affiliations

- Author Affiliations

^A Marrinya Agricultural Enterprises, 70 Vigilantis Road, Wuk Wuk, Vic. 3875, Australia.

^B Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

^C Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.

^D Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences,Murdoch University, WA 6150, Australia.

^E Corresponding author. Email: rod.polkinghorne@gmail.com

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(11) 1459-1464 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07175
Submitted: 12 June 2007 Accepted: 18 July 2008 Published: 16 October 2008

Abstract

Progress in the development and adoption of the Meat Standards Australia system has encouraged substantial change and an improved consumer awareness at all points of the Australian beef production chain. The system is moving from niche to mainstream market application with the exciting potential to transform many industry practices and build a more direct consumer focus. The system aims to accurately predict consumer satisfaction levels for individual cooked beef portions. This is a major advance on grading systems that classify carcasses into groups of like appearance. A prediction model was developed based on consumer testing and has proved to be useful in categorising a wide range of beef into consumer grades within cooking methods. These provide a basis to ensure a predictable eating quality result for the consumer and a mechanism to align product description and pricing throughout the production chain. When used in value-based marketing systems financial reward can be directly linked to consumer satisfaction encouraging a consumer-focussed industry. Research is proceeding to extend and improve the accuracy of the prediction model encompassing additional cattle types and cooking methods. Several projects in other countries are adding insights into the relative response of consumers from varied cultural backgrounds. It is hoped that further international collaboration will facilitate use of the developed technology to improve consumer value and industry returns through improved product consistency in global markets.

Additional keywords: beef grading, beef quality, value-based pricing.

References

Dart C, Griffiths G, Rodgers H, Thompson J (2008) The aggregate economic benefits at the wholesale level from the adoption of Meat Standards Australia. First estimates. Australasian Agribusiness Review 16, in press.

Hwang IH, Polkinghorne R, Lee JM, Thompson JM (2008) Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1387–1395.

Miller RK , Taylor JF , Sanders JO , Lunt DK , Davis SK , Turner JW , Savell JW , Kallel F , Ophir J , Lacey RE (1996) Methods for improving beef tenderness. In ‘Proceedings of the 49th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference. Vol. 49’. p. 106.

Park BY, Hwang IH, Cho SH, Yoo YM, Kim JH, Lee JM, Polkinghorne R, Thompson JM (2008) Effect of carcass suspension and cooking method on the palatability of three beef muscles as assessed by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1396–1404.

Polkinghorne R (2005) Does variation between muscles in sensory traits preclude carcass grading as a useful tool for consumers? In ‘Proceedings of 51st International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 7–12 August 2005, Baltimore, USA’. p. 4.

Polkinghorne R (2006) Implementing a palatability assured critical control point (PACCP) approach to satisfy consumer demands. Meat Science 74, 180–187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polkinghorne R, Philpott J, Gee A, Doljanin A, Innes J (2008 ) Development of a commercial system to apply the Meat Standards Australia grading model to optimise the return on eating quality in a beef supply chain. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1451–1458.

Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Koohmaraie M (2005) On-line classification of US Select beef carcasses for longissimus tenderness using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Meat Science 69, 409–415.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thompson JM, Polkinghorne R, Hwang IH, Gee AM, Cho SH, Park BY, Lee JM (2008) Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1380–1386.

Watson R, Polkinghorne R, Thompson JM (2008a) Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1368–1379.

Watson R, Gee A, Polkinghorne R, Porter M (2008b) Consumer assessment of eating quality – development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1360–1367.