Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Alternative replenishment regimens to maintain diazinon concentration during shower, plunge and immersion cage dipping of Merino sheep

G. W. Levot A C and R. D. Lund B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 8, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

B Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, PMB 19, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: garry.levot@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(11) 1326-1332 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06168
Submitted: 1 June 2006  Accepted: 5 April 2007   Published: 18 October 2007

Abstract

Constant replenishment of a 1000-L Buzzacott shower dip sump with diazinon solution at concentrations 100, 200, 300 or 500 mg/L failed to maintain the initial charge rate of 100 mg/L when short-wool Merino sheep were showered for 12 min. According to these regimens, by the completion of dipping the third pen of sheep working concentrations had dropped to 11, 29, 35 and 51 mg/L for sheep treated with replenishment solutions of 100, 200, 300 and 500 mg/L, respectively. These results suggest that the working concentration of diazinon sheep dips may be increased and maintained by raising the concentration of the replenishment solution. On average, wool samples taken from these sheep immediately after dipping contained 207, 453, 473 and 730 mg/kg, respectively. Comparison of dip concentration and wool residues indicated a linear relationship. This suggests that the capacity for Merino wool to absorb diazinon had not yet reached saturation. Compounding the difficulties with the reliability of constant replenishment shower dipping, current label directions for reinforcement and topping-up of diazinon sheep dips are unclear and often misinterpreted. A simpler and far more reliable strategy that ensured that each pen of sheep was treated similarly was tested. In this scheme, sufficient fresh dip wash (540 mg/L) from the replenishment tank was transferred to the dip sump to restore the initial sump volume after showering of each pen of sheep. This scheme reliably restored the sump concentration to the current nominal initial charge rate (100 mg/L) and was by far the easiest and most practical replenishment scheme tested. This should be the preferred strategy for shower dipping. Working concentrations of diazinon in a 5000-L mobile plunge dip charged at 100 mg/L and constantly replenished with 200 mg/L solution were maintained close to the nominal application rate of 100 mg/L. Current product label directions for reinforcement and topping-up of plunge dips were shown to be suitable for immersion cage dips operated according to these principles.


Acknowledgements

We thank Messrs Phillip King of King Livestock Services and Paul Gentles of Paul Gentles Plunge Dipping for their willing cooperation and for the use of their dips, Ms Kim Dawson for assistance with the shower dipping trials and the woolgrowers who allowed us onto their properties. The study described in this paper was funded by Australian woolgrowers and the Australian Government through Australian Wool Innovation Limited.


References


Chandler D, Richards G (2001) Low residue Diprite® dipping of sheep with the Richards immersion-cage sheep dip. In ‘Proceedings of the fly and lice integrated control strategies conference, Launceston, June 2001’. pp. 200–205.

Graham NPH, Sinclair AN, Cavey WA (1959) Control of insecticide exhaustion in sheep showers. Australian Veterinary Journal 35, 99–100. open url image1

Levot GW (1994) A survey of organophosphate susceptibility in populations of Bovicola ovis (Schrank) (Phthiraptera: Trichodectidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 33, 31–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lund RD, Johnson PW, Gould NS, Van De Ven RJ (1998) DAN 197 Improved design and use of dipping equipment for sheep lice eradication. Final Report to International Wool Secretariat.

Lund RD, Levot GW, Black R (2005) Changes in insecticide concentration during shower and plunge dipping of Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1139–1145.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

NSW Sheep Lice Control Manual Advisory & Regulatory Programs & Policies. NSW Agriculture (1997) .

Robinson PW, Reid TC, Joyce NI, Boul HL (1998) Meeting market and consumer requirements in wool production. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 46, 172–187.

Sherwood N, Watts T, Allan C, Chandler D (1999) Variation of pesticide concentration in sheep dips operated according to traditional and revised methods. Australian Veterinary Journal 77, 384–387.
PubMed |
open url image1