Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differential responses to selection for aluminium stress tolerance in triticale

X. G. Zhang, R. S. Jessop and the late F. Ellison

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53(12) 1295 - 1303
Published: 16 December 2002

Abstract

A directional selection program was initiated to select triticale genotypes with improved aluminium (Al) tolerance and presumably acid-stress tolerance. Two consecutive cycles of 2-way selection for either high or low apparent Al tolerances from a base population, Tahara, resulted in the production of 6 selected lines, whose progenies were tested for Al tolerance response in terms of root regrowth characteristics in nutrient solutions to assess selection effectiveness. In addition, 1 cycle of 2-way selection from 2 other base populations, Empat and 19th ITSN 70-4, resulted in 4 selected lines.

Selective responses differed among selected lines, depending largely on the direction of the selection made and, to a lesser extent, on the genetic background of the original population. Upward selection for longer root regrowth produced progeny with more highly Al-tolerant plants. Although varying estimates of realised heritability were generated, the 2 cycles of upward selection resulted in an enhanced Al tolerance of 14.5% in the progeny A9701 derived from the base population Tahara. These results suggest that directional selection based on longer root regrowth in nutrient solutions was effective in improving Al tolerance. A pot-culture experiment showed that the second selection generation (S2) Al-tolerant lines were more productive than their moderately Al-tolerant counterparts, further implicating the effectiveness of directional selection in enhancing Al stress tolerance and plant productivity.

Keywords: acid stress, directional selection, genetic evaluation, heritability, nutrient solutions, root regrowth.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01187

© CSIRO 2002

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Cited By (5) Get Permission

View Dimensions