Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Environmental impact of conventional and Bt insecticidal cotton expressing one and two Cry genes in Australia

Oliver G. G. Knox A E , Greg A. Constable B , Bruce Pyke C and V. V. S. R. Gupta D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Entomology, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.

B CSIRO Plant Industry, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.

C Cotton Research and Development Corporation, 2 Lloyd Street, PO Box 282, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.

D CSIRO Entomology, Gate 5, Waite Road, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: oliver.knox@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(5) 501-509 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05366
Submitted: 18 October 2005  Accepted: 30 January 2006   Published: 17 May 2006

Abstract

Genetically modified Bt cotton, expressing the Cry1Ac protein for specific insecticidal activity against economically significant lepidopteran pests, has been available commercially in Australia since 1996. This technology has been improved and superseded by the addition of a second gene, allowing new varieties to express both the Cry1Ac the Cry2Ab proteins.

Bt cotton offers several advantages to the grower, mainly through reduced insecticide spray requirements. The environmental benefits of reduced insecticide usage are assessed in this paper using the environmental impact quotient (EIQ). The assessment included consideration of the impact of the expressed transgenic proteins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab. EIQ values of the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab proteins were calculated at 9.9 and 7.9, respectively. Bt protein expression, plant biomass, insecticide application records, constituent of active ingredient, and insecticide EIQ values were used to produce an environmental impact (EI) value for insecticide use (kg a.i./ha) for conventional non-GM and single- and 2-gene Bt cotton for the 1997–98 to 2003–04 seasons. Inclusion of the Cry proteins in the assessment increased the EI values for Bt cotton by only 2%. The average insecticide EI value, for 2002–03 and 2003–04 seasons, for conventional cotton was 135 kg a.i./ha, whereas for the 2-gene Bt variety it was only 28 kg a.i./ha. Results of the EI evaluation indicate that, due to changes in insecticidal choice and reduction in usage, there was a reduction of >64% in EI from growing Bt cotton compared with conventional non-GM cotton in Australia.

Additional keywords: integrated pest management, INGARD®, Bollgard® II, environment, transgenic, genetically modified, Cry1Ac, Cry 2Ab, impact quotient.


Acknowledgments

This work was carried out under funding provided by the Cotton Research and Development Corporation, but would not have been possible without the work and data collection services provided by the Cotton Consultants Australia Inc.


References


Adamczyk JJ (2001) Profiling season long expression of Cry1Ac in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard® II cotton influence of parental background and environmental factors on endotoxin expression levels. In ‘Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference’. pp. 1420–1423. (National Cotton Council: Memphis, TN)

Aventis Crop Science Pty Ltd (2002) GEMSTAR Helicoverpa management through bioscience. Available at: http://www.bayercropscience.com.au/products/resources/brochure/gemstar%20tech%20guide.pdf

Bange MP, Milroy SP (2004) Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes. Field Crops Research 87, 73–87.
CrossRef |

Betz FS, Hammond BG, Fuchs RL (2000) Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 32, 156–173.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Brimner TA, Gallivan GJ, Stephenson GR (2005) Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Management Science 61, 47–52.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Constable GA, Gleeson AC (1977) Growth and distribution of dry matter in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 249–256.
CrossRef |

Crossan AN, Lee N, Sharma R, Kennedy IR, Beckett R (2002) Assessment of the distribution of pesticides on soil particle fractions in simulated irrigation run-off using centrifugal SPLITT fractionation and ELISA. Analytica Chimica Acta 468, 199–208.
CrossRef |

Doyle B , Reeve I , Bock K (2004) ‘The 2004 market audit. A survey of crop management products used in the Australian cotton crop for the 2003–2004 season.’ A commercial report prepared on behalf of Cotton Consultants Australia Inc. (IRF Cotton Research)

EXTOXNET (2004) The EXtension TOXicology NETwork Global Search. Available at: http://extoxnet.orst.edu/ghindex.html

Fitt GP (1994) Cotton pest management: Part 3. An Australian perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 39, 543–562.
CrossRef |

Fitt GP (2000) An Australian approach to IPM in cotton: Integrating new technologies to minimise insecticide dependence. Crop Protection 19, 793–800.
CrossRef |

Gajendra Babu B, Udayasuriyan V, Asia Mariam M, Sivakumar NC, Bharathi M, Balasubramanian G (2002) Comparative toxicity of Cry1ac and Cry2aa delta-endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera (H.). Crop Protection 21, 817–822.
CrossRef |

Gallivan GJ, Surgeoner GA, Kovach J (2001) Pesticide risk reduction on crops in the province of ontario. Journal of Environmental Quality 30, 798–813.
PubMed |


Greenplate JT (1999) Quantification of Bacillus thuringiensis insect control protein Cry1Ac over time in Bollgard cotton fruit and terminals. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 1377–1383.

Greenplate JT, Mullins JW, Penn SR, Dahm A, Reich BJ, Osborn JA, Rahn PR, Ruschke L, Shappley ZW (2003) Partial characterization of cotton plants expressing two toxin proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis: Relative toxin contribution, toxin interaction, and resistance management. Journal of Applied Entomology 127, 340–347.
CrossRef |

Gupta VVSR , Watson SK (2004) Ecological impacts of GM cotton on soil biodiversity—Below ground production of Bt by GM cotton and Bt cotton impacts on soil biological processes. CLW project report submitted to Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia.

Hoque Z , Dillon M , Farquharson B (2002) Three seasons of IPM in an area wide management group – a comparative analysis of field level profitability. In ‘Field to Fashion: 11th Australian Cotton Conference’. pp. 749–755. (ACGRA: Orange, NSW)

James C (2004) ‘Preview: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2004.’ ISAAA Briefs No. 32. (ISAAA: Ithaca, NY)

Knox OGG , Gupta VVSR , Roberts GN (2004) Genetically modified cotton influence on soil microbiota. In ‘3rd Australian Soilborne Disease Symposium’. pp. 166–167. (South Australian Research and Development Institute: Adelaide, S. Aust.)

Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J, Tette J (1992) A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139, 1–8.

Kovach J , Petzoldt C , Degni J , Tette J (2004) A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. http://www.nysipm.cornell.edu/publications/EIQ_values04.pdf

Maud J, Edwards-Jones G, Quin F (2001) Comparative evaluation of pesticide risk indices for policy development and assessment in the United Kingdom. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86, 59–73.
CrossRef |

McClintock JT, Schafer CR, Sjobald RD (1995) A comparitive review of the mammalian toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis-based pesticides. Pesticide Science 45, 95–105.

Monsanto (2002) Safety assessment of Bollgard cotton event 531. Available at: http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/bollgard/pss.pdf

Monsanto (2003) Safety assessment of Bollgard® II cotton event 15985. Available at: http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/bollgard_II/pss.pdf

Monsanto Australia Limited (2004) Area of biotech cotton doubles: Australian growers embrace cleaner and greener biotechnology. Available at: http://www.monsanto.com.au/content/links_resources/media/04/04_20_12.pdf

Monsanto Australia Limited (2003) ‘Bollgard® II Cotton Technical Manual.’ (Monsanto: Vic.)

Naranjo SE (2002) Arthropod communities and transgenic cotton in the Western USA. In ‘Proceedings 3rd California Conference on Biological Control’. Davis, CA. (Ed. M Hoddle) pp. 33–38.

Pyke B , Fitt GP (1998) Field performance of INGARD® cotton-the first two years. In ‘Pest management—future challenges’. (Eds MP Zaluki, RAI Drew, GG White) (University of Queensland Press: Brisbane, Qld)

Sánchez-Bayo F, Baskaran S, Kennedy IR (2002) Ecological Relative Risk (Ecorr): another approach for risk assessment of pesticides in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91, 37–57.
CrossRef |

Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (2002) Bt toxin is released in root exudates from 12 transgenic corn hybrids representing three transformation events. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34, 133–137.
CrossRef |

Saxena D, Stewart CN, Altosaar I, Shu Q, Stotzky G (2004) Larvicidal Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis are released in root exudates of transgenic B. thuringiensis corn, potato, and rice but not of B. thuringiensis canola, cotton, and tobacco. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 42, 383–387.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000) Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt Corn in vitro and in situ. Fems Microbiology Ecology 33, 35–39.
PubMed |


Shivaramaiah HM, Odeh IOA, Kennedy IR, Skerritt JH (2002) Mapping the distribution of DDT residues as DDE in the soils of the irrigated regions of northern New South Wales, Australia, using ELISA and GIS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 5360–5367.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Sims SR (1995) Bacillus thuringiensis Var Kurstaki [Cryia(C)] Protein expressed in transgenic cotton: Effects on beneficial and other non-target insects. Southwestern Entomologist 20, 493–500.

Sims SR (1997) Host activity spectrum of the Cryiia Bacillus thuringiensis Subsp. Kurstaki protein: Effects on Lepidoptera, Diptera, and non-target arthropods. Southwestern Entomologist 22, 395–404.

Sisterson M, Biggs R, Olson C, Carriere Y, Dennehy T, Tabashnik B (2004) Arthropod abundance and diversity in Bt and non-Bt cotton fields. Environmental Entomology 33, 921–929.

Tabashnik B, Dennehy T, CarrièRe Y, Liu YB, Meyer S, Patin A, Sims M, Ellers-Kirk C (2003) Resistance Management: Slowing pest adaptation to transgenic crops. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B–Plant Soil Science 53, 51–56.
CrossRef |

Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998) Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis Subsp. Kurstaki in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 471–476.
CrossRef |

Taylor I , Charles G , Inchbold B (2003) Reducing residual pre-emergent or pre-plant herbicide use in cotton through the development of weed thresholds. In ‘World Cotton Conference-3’. pp. 835–845. (Agriculture Research Council—Institute for Industrial Crops: Pretoria, South Africa)

US EPA (2002) Biopesticide registration action document (Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein and its genetic material necessary for its production in cotton). (Ammended) Available at http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/tech_docs/brad_006487.pdf

Wicks C (2002) Benchmarking to improve your performance in pest management. In ‘Field to Fashion: 11th Australian Cotton Conference’. pp. 47–55. (ACGRA: Orange, NSW)








Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (24)