Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. I. Variation in soybean and wild Glycine spp. for epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content

A. T. James A , R. J. Lawn B D and M. Cooper C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia Qld 4072; now CSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811 and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia; now Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., PO Box 1004, Johnston, Iowa 50131, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: Robert.Lawn@jcu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(7) 656-669 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07159
Submitted: 19 April 2007  Accepted: 18 March 2008   Published: 3 July 2008

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to assess genotypic variation in soybean and related wild species for traits with putative effects on leaf turgor maintenance in droughted plants. Traits of interest were (i) epidermal conductance (ge) which influences the rate of water loss from stressed leaves after stomatal closure; (ii) osmotic adjustment (OA) as indicated by tissue osmotic potential (π), which potentially affects the capacity to withdraw water at low soil water potential; and (iii) relative water content (RWC) at incipient leaf death (critical relative water content, RWCC), which is a measure of the dehydration tolerance of leaf tissue. The germplasm comprised a diverse set of 58 soybean genotypes, 2 genotypes of the annual wild species G. soja and 9 genotypes representing 6 perennial wild Glycine spp. indigenous/endemic to Australia. Seedling plants were grown in soil-filled beds in the glasshouse and exposed to terminal water deficit stress from the second trifoliolate leaflet stage (21 days after sowing). Measurements were made on well watered plants, moderately stressed plants, and at incipient plant death, in 2 separate studies. In both studies, there were significant genotypic differences in all 3 traits in the stressed plants. However, across the 3 sample times, ge decreased and the absolute magnitude of π increased, indicating that the expression of these traits changed as the plants acclimated to the stress. RWC was therefore used as a covariate to adjust the genotypic values of π and ge in order to facilitate comparison at a consistent plant water status of 70% RWC. There was statistically significant genotypic variation for the adjusted values, ge70 and π70, in both studies, and genotypic correlations between the 2 studies were significant (P < 0.05) and positive for all 3 traits: ge70 (r = 0.48), π70 (r = 0.50), and RWCC (r = 0.53). Among the soybean genotypes, there was at least a 2-fold range in ge70, a 0.7 MPa range in π70, and a 12 percentage point range in RWCC. Some of the perennial wild genotypes exhibited lower values of ge and RWCC and greater OA than soybean and G. soja, consistent with adaptation to drier environments. While the repeatability of measurement between experiments was variable among genotypes, the studies confirmed the existence of genotypic differences for ge, OA, and RWCC in cultivated soybean, with a wider range among the wild germplasm.

Additional keywords: breeding, drought resistance, leaf survival, turgor maintenance, physiology.


Acknowledgments

The research reported here was supported by CSIRO, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research and was undertaken in partial fulfillment of the PhD degree awarded to ATJ by the University of Queensland in 2004.


References


Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 413–428. open url image1

Bernardi AL, Rose IA, Andrews JA (1995) Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean) cv. Banjalong. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 118.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cortes PM, Sinclair TR (1986) Water relations of field-grown soybean under drought. Crop Science 26, 993–998. open url image1

Hufstetler VE, Boerma HR, Carter TE, Earl HJ (2007) Genotypic variation for three physiological traits affecting drought tolerance in soybean. Crop Science 47, 25–35.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

James AT, Lawn RJ, Cooper M (2008a) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. II. Inter-relations between epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, relative water content, and plant survival. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 670–678. open url image1

James AT, Lawn RJ, Cooper M (2008b) Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. III. Broad-sense heritability of epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 679–689. open url image1

Lawn RJ (1982) Response of four grain legumes to water stress in south-eastern Queensland. I. Physiological response mechanisms. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 481–496.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lawn RJ, Byth DE, Mungomery VE (1977) Response of soybeans to planting date in south-eastern Queensland. III. Agronomic and physiological response of cultivars to planting arrangement. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 63–79.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lawn RJ, Imrie BC (1991) Crop improvement for tropical Australia: designing plants for difficult climates. Field Crops Research 26, 113–139.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lawn RJ, Imrie BC (1994) Register of Australian oilseed cultivars: Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv. Leichhardt. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 297.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lawn RJ, Watkinson AR (2002) Habitat, morphological diversity and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1305–1316.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Likoswe AA, Lawn RJ (2008) Response to terminal water deficit stress of cowpea, pigeonpea and soybean in pure stand and in competition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 27–37.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lowe KF (1973) Pastures in West Moreton — 1. Queensland Agricultural Journal 99, 421–429. open url image1

Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. In ‘Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: Water shortage’. (Eds KH Kreeb, H Richter, TM Hinckley) pp. 269–281. (SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague, The Netherlands)

Ludlow MM, Chu ACP, Clements RJ, Kerslake RG (1983) Adaptation of Centrosema to water stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 10, 119–130.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Meyer RF, Boyer JS (1972) Sensitivity of cell division and cell elongation to low water potentials in soybean hypocotyls. Planta 108, 77–87.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JM (1977) Differences in osmoregulation between wheat genotypes. Nature 270, 234–235.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JM (1992) Adaptation to water deficits in three grain legume species. Mechanisms of turgor maintenance. Field Crops Research 29, 91–106.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Morgan JM (2000) Increases in grain yield of wheat by breeding for an osmoregulation gene: relationship to water supply and evaporative demand. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 971–978.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Muchow RC (1985) Stomatal behaviour in grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 11, 291–307.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pajé M, Ludlow MM, Lawn RJ (1988) Variation among soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) accessions in epidermal conductance of leaves. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 363–373.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Passioura JB (1988) Water transport in and to roots. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39, 245–265.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ritchie GA, Hinckley TM (1975) The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research. Advances in Ecological Research 9, 165–254.
Crossref |
open url image1

Rose IA (1987) Sowing-date responses of early maturing indeterminate soybean genotypes in northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 135–140.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rose IA (1991) Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean) cv. Oxley. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rose IA, McWhirter KS, Spurway RA (1992) Identification of drought-tolerance in early-maturing indeterminate soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 645–657.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Russell MJ, Kleinschmidt FH (1984) Performance of pasture grass cultivars and their associates at Queensland Agricultural College. Tropical Grasslands 18, 55–61. open url image1

Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1985) Who taught plants thermodynamics? The unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 12, 213–217. open url image1

Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1986) Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 329–341.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sionit N, Kramer PJ (1977) Effects of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agronomy Journal 69, 274–278. open url image1

Sloane RJ, Patterson RP, Carter TE (1990) Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Science 30, 118–123. open url image1

Turner NC, Begg JE, Rawson HM, English SD, Hearn AB (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. III. Components of leaf water potential, leaf conductance, 14CO2 photosynthesis and adaptation to water deficits. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 179–194.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Turner NC , Wright GC , Siddique KMH (2003) Adaptation of grain legumes to water-limited environments: selection for physiological, biochemical, and yield component characteristics for improved drought resistance. In ‘Management of agricultural drought: agronomic and genetic options’. (Ed. NP Saxena) pp. 43–80. (Science Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, NH)

Willis AJ , Jefferies RL (1963) Investigations on the water relations of sand-dune plants under natural conditions. In ‘The water relations of plants’. (Eds AJ Rutter, FH Whitehead) pp. 169–189. (Blackwell: Oxford, UK)