Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

QTLs and their interaction determining different heading dates of barley in Australia and China

Xifeng Ren A , Chengdao Li B D , W. J. R. Boyd C , Sharon Westcott B , C. R. Grime C , Dongfa Sun A D and Reg Lance B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

B Department of Agriculture & Food/Agricultural Research Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6155, Australia.

C Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

D Corresponding authors. Email: chengdao.li@agric.wa.gov.au; sundongfa@mail.hzau.edu.cn

Crop and Pasture Science 61(2) 145-152 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP09187
Submitted: 29 June 2009  Accepted: 4 December 2009   Published: 8 February 2010

Abstract

Heading date is a major determinant of the regional and seasonal adaptation of barley varieties. The dogma is that introduced germplasm is more likely to be adapted if it is derived from a similar latitude. However, barley germplasm introduced from similar latitudes of South-East Asia is extremely early heading in the Australian environments and vice versa. A doubled-haploid population from a cross of an Australian barley Galleon and a Japanese barley Haruna Nijo was evaluated for heading date in Australia (Perth, 31°56′S) and China (Wuhan, 30°33′N) under normal autumn sowing, late sowing in the field, and extended-light glasshouse conditions. One major QTL was identified on chromosome 5H under the three conditions in China. The single QTL accounted for up to 50% of phenotypic variation for heading date. The Australian variety contributed to late heading date. Two QTLs on chromosomes 4H and 5H were detected for controlling heading date in Australia. The QTL/QTL interaction contributed up to 35.8% of phenotypic variation for heading date in Australia, which is the major reason for the extremely early heading date of the Japanese variety in the Australian environment. The chromosome 5H QTL was detected at the same chromosomal location when the population was grown in either China or Australia. In both environments the Australian variety contributed to the late heading date. Selection against the Japanese alleles of chromosomes 4H and 5H QTLs could eliminate the extremely early genotype in Australia and selection against the Australian allele of chromosome 5H QTL could eliminate the extremely late genotype in China when Australian and Japanese germplasms are used in the breeding programs.

Additional keywords: quantitative trait loci, QTL/QTL interaction, heading date, MAS, Hordeum vulgare.


Acknowledgments

This project is partially supported by the Grain Research & Development Corporation of Australia, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30630047), and the China 863 project (2006AA10Z1C3).


References


Ayoub M, Symons SJ, Edney MJ, Mather DE (2002) QTLs affecting kernel size and shape in a two-rowed by six-rowed barley cross. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105, 237–247.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Backes G, Graner A, Foroughi-Wehr B, Fischbeck G, Wenzel G, Jahoor A (1995) Localization of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for agronomic important characters by the use of an RFLP map in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90, 294–302.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Baum M, Grando S, Backes G, Jahoor A, Sabbagh A, Ceccarelli S (2003) QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross ‘Arta’ × H. spontaneum 41-1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 1215–1225.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Bezant J, Laurie D, Pratchett N, Chojecki J, Kearsey M (1997) Mapping QTL controlling yield and yield components in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross using marker regression. Molecular Breeding 3, 29–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Boyd WJR, Li CD, Grime CR, Cakir M, Potipibool S, Kaveeta L, Men S, Jalal Kamali MR, Barr AR, Moody DB, Lance RCM, Logue SJ, Raman H, Read BJ (2003) Conventional and molecular genetic analysis of factors contributing to variation in the timing of heading among spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes grown over a mild winter growing season. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1277–1301.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Cuesta-Marcos A, Casas AM, Yahiaoui S, Gracia MP, Lasa JM, Igartua E (2008a) Joint analysis for heading date QTL in small interconnected barley populations. Molecular Breeding 21, 383–399.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cuesta-Marcos A, Igartua E, Ciudad FJ, Codesal P, Russell JR, Molina-Cano JL, Moralejo M, Szücs P, Gracia MP, Lasa JM, Casas AM (2008b) Heading date QTL in a spring × winter barley cross evaluated in Mediterranean environments. Molecular Breeding 21, 455–471.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Danyluk J, Kane NA, Breton G, Limin AE, Fowler DB, Sarhan F (2003) TaVRT-1, a putative transcription factor associated with vegetative to reproductive transition in cereals. Plant Physiology 132, 1849–1860.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Doerge RW, Churchill GA (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142, 285–294.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Dubcovsky J, Chen C, Yan L (2005) Molecular characterization of the allelic variation at the VRN-H2 vernalization locus in barley. Molecular Breeding 15, 395–407.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Franckowiak JD, Konishi T (2002) Early maturity 6, Eam6. Barley Genetics Newsletter 32, 86–87. open url image1

Fu D, Szücs P, Yan L, Helguera M, Skinner JS, von Zitzewitz J, Hayes PM, Dubcovsky J (2005) Large deletions within the first intron in VRN-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 273, 54–65.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Gallagher LW, Soliman KM, Vivar H (1991) Interactions among loci conferring photoperiod insensitivity for heading time in spring barley. Crop Science 31, 256–261. open url image1

Hackett CA, Ellis RP, Forster BP, McNicol JW, Macaulay M (1992) Statistical analysis of a linkage experiment in barley involving quantitative trait loci for height and ear-emergence time and two genetic markers on chromosome 4. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 85, 120–126.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hay RKM, Ellis RP (1998) The control of flowering in wheat and barley: what recent advances in molecular genetics can reveal. Annals of Botany 82, 541–554.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hayes PM, Blake T, Chen THH, Tragoonrung S, Chen F, Pan A, Liu B (1993) Quantitative trait loci on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) chromosome 7 associated with components of winter hardiness. Genome 36, 66–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Horsley RD, Schmierer D, Maier C, Kudrna D, Urrea CA, Steffenson BJ, Schwarz PB, Franckowiak JD, Green MJ, Zhang B, Kleinhofs A (2006) Identification of QTLs associated with fusarium head blight resistance in barley accession CIho 4196. Crop Science 46, 145–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Karakousis A, Barr AR, Kretschmer JM, Manning S, Logue SJ, Roumeliotis S, Collins HM, Chalmers KJ, Li CD, Lance RCM, Langridge P (2003) Mapping and QTL analysis of the barley population Galleon × Haruna Nijo. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1131–1135.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Karsai I, Szücs P, Mészáros K, Filichkina T, Hayes PM, Skinner JS, Láng L, Bedǒ Z (2005) The Vrn-H2 locus is a major determinant of flowering time in a facultative × winter growth habit barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mapping population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110, 1458–1466.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Kicherer S, Backes G, Walther U, Jahoor A (2000) Localising QTLs for leaf rust resistance and agronomic traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100, 881–888.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Kleinhofs A, Kilian A, Saghai Maroof MA, Biyashev RM, Hayes P, Chen FQ, Lapitan N, Fenwick A, Blake TK, Kanazin V, Ananiev E, Dahleen L, Kudrna D, Bollinger J, Knapp SJ, Liu B, Sorrells M, Heun M, Franckowiak JD, Hoffman D, Skadsen R, Steffenson BJ (1993) A molecular, isozyme and morphological map of the barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genome. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 705–712.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Laurie DA, Pratchett N, Bezant JH, Snape JW (1994) Genetic analysis of a photoperiod response gene on the short arm of chromosome 2 (2H) of Hordeum vulgare (barley). Heredity 72, 619–627.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Laurie DA, Pratchett N, Bezant JH, Snape JW (1995) RFLP mapping of five major genes and eight quantitative trait loci controlling flowering time in a winter × spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross. Genome 38, 575–585.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Marquez-Cedillo LA, Hayes PM, Jones BL, Kleinhofs A, Legge WG, Rossnagel BG, Sato K, Ullrich SE, Wesenberg DM (2000) QTL analysis of malting quality in barley based on the doubled-haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101, 173–184.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Marquez-Cedillo LA, Hayes PM, Kleinhofs A, Legge WG, Rossnagel BG, Sato K, Ullrich SE, Wesenberg DM (2001) QTL analysis of agronomic traits in barley based on the doubled haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103, 625–637.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Moralejo M, Swanston JS, Muńoz P, Prada D, Elia M, Russell JR, Ramsay L, Cistué L, Codesal P, Casas AM, Romagosa I, Powell W, Molina-Cano JL (2004) Use of new EST markers to elucidate the genetic differences in grain protein content between European and North American two-rowed malting barleys. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110, 116–125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335, 721–726.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Takahashi R , Yasuda S (1971) Genetics of earliness and growth habit in barley. In ‘Barley genetics’. (Ed. RA Nilan) pp. 388–408. (Washington State University Press: Washington, DC)

Teulat B, Merah O, Souyris I, This D (2001) QTLs for agronomic traits from a Mediterranean barley progeny grown in several environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103, 774–787.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Thomas WTB, Powell W, Waugh R, Chalmers KJ, Barua UM, Jack P, Lea V, Forster BP, Swanston JS, Ellis RP, Hanson PR, Lance RCM (1995) Detection of quantitative trait loci for agronomic, yield, grain and disease characters in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91, 1037–1047.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA (2005) The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310, 1031–1034.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

von Zitzewitz J, Szücs P, Dubcovsky J, Yan L, Francia E, Pecchioni N, Casas A, Chen THH, Hayes PM, Skinner JS (2005) Molecular and structural characterization of barley vernalization genes. Plant Molecular Biology 59, 449–467.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Ramakrishna W, SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL, Echenique V, Dubcovsky J (2004) The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 303, 1640–1644.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | open url image1

Yang J, Zhu J (2005) Methods for predicting superior genotypes under multiple environments based on QTL effects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110, 1268–1274.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Yasuda S, Hayashi J, Moriya I (1993) Genetic constitution for spring growth habit and some other characters in barley cultivars in the Mediterranean coastal regions. Euphytica 70, 77–83.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1