Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sugarcane yield gap: can it be determined at national level with a simple agrometeorological model?

Leonardo A. Monteiro A and Paulo C. Sentelhas A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Biosystems Engineering, ESALQ, University of São Paulo, Avenida Pádua Dias, 11, 13418-900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

B Corresponding author. Email: pcsentel.esalq@usp.br

Crop and Pasture Science 68(3) 272-284 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16334
Submitted: 10 September 2016  Accepted: 6 March 2017   Published: 4 April 2017

Abstract

Brazilian sugarcane yield is below its physiological potential, which has compromised the crop’s profitability. This, together with the expansion of the crop to marginal areas with limiting climatic conditions, requires studies to quantify crop yield gaps (YG) and to identify their main causes (i.e. droughts and/or crop management). One way to determine YG is through crop simulation models, which vary in complexity, mainly in terms of input data requirements. This study evaluated whether a simple agrometeorological crop yield model could be suitable for estimating sugarcane YG at a national level, in order to consider and suggest practices to mitigate yield losses. The model was calibrated and evaluated for different conditions across the country. The calibrated model was used to estimate plant and ratoon sugarcane potential (Yp) and best farmer (Ybf) yields for 259 locations representing all regions of the country where sugarcane is grown. Weather data from 1984 to 2013 and general local soil information were used as inputs. The Yp and Ybf simulations were performed for 30 growing cycles, with the final yields being weighted by the proportion of plant (20%) and ratoon (80%) canes in each area. These data were compared with actual average yields (Yavg), obtained from official surveys. Sugarcane yields varied considerably across the country: Yp range was 68.5–232.7 t ha–1, Ybf 61.7–123.3 t ha–1, and Yavg 11.2–101.1 t ha–1. These yields resulted in an average total YG of 133.2 t ha–1. The main source of YG was water deficit, accounting for 75.6% of total losses, while crop management was responsible for 24.4%. Considering the main sources of YG for sugarcane in Brazil, the use of drought-tolerant cultivars, irrigation, and deep soil preparation seems the best strategy to mitigate the risks, improving yields. Based on these results, the simple agrometeorological crop yield model proved suitable to estimate sugarcane YG at national level.

Additional keywords: crop modelling, ethanol production, risks mitigation, sugar, water stress.


References

Affholder F, Poeydebat C, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Tittonell P (2013) The yield gap of major food crops in family agriculture in the tropics: Assessment and analysis through field surveys and modelling. Field Crops Research 143, 106–118.
The yield gap of major food crops in family agriculture in the tropics: Assessment and analysis through field surveys and modelling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) ‘Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements.’ FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. (FAO: Rome)

Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Goncalves JLD (2013) Modeling monthly mean air temperature for Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 113, 407–427.
Modeling monthly mean air temperature for Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baquero JE, Ralisch R, Medina CD, Tavares J, Guimaraes MD (2012) Soil physical properties and sugarcane root growth in a Red Oxisol. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 36, 63–70.
Soil physical properties and sugarcane root growth in a Red Oxisol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Battie Laclau PB, Laclau JP (2009) Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in Brazil. Field Crops Research 114, 351–360.
Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bhatia VS, Singh P, Wani SP, Chauhan GS, Rao AVRK, Mishra AK, Sriniuas K (2008) Analysis of potential yields and yield gaps of rainfed soybean in India using CROPGRO-Soybean model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 1252–1265.
Analysis of potential yields and yield gaps of rainfed soybean in India using CROPGRO-Soybean model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Campos PF, Alves J, Casaroli D, Fontoura PR, Evangelista AWP (2014) Varieties of sugarcane to supplemental irrigation in Brazilian savanna. Engenharia Agrícola 34, 1139–1149.
Varieties of sugarcane to supplemental irrigation in Brazilian savanna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cassman KG, Dobermann A, Walters DT, Yang H (2003) Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Envionmental Research 28, 315–358.
Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

da Silva VPR, da Silva BB, Albuquerque WG, Borges CJR, de Sousa IF, Neto JD (2013) Crop coefficient, water requirements, yield and water use efficiency of sugarcane growth in Brazil. Agricultural Water Management 128, 102–109.
Crop coefficient, water requirements, yield and water use efficiency of sugarcane growth in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Andrade AS, Bastos EA, Ribeiro VQ, Duarte JAL, Braga DL, Noleto DH (2012) Irrigation, nitrogen and potassium levels under subsurface drip on sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47, 76–84.

de Oliveira ECA, Freire FJ, de Oliveira AC, Neto DES, da Rocha AT, de Carvalho LA (2011) Productivity, water use efficiency, and technological quality of sugarcane subjected to different water regimes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 46, 617–625.

de Souza LF (2013) Aplicação do modelo ORYZA-DSSAT para a estimativa da produtividade de arroz de terras altas como subsídio ao zoneamento de risco climático no Estado de Goiás, Brasil. PhD Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

de Souza GS, de Souza ZM, da Silva RB, Araujo FS, Barbosa RS (2012) Soil compressibility and root system of sugarcane with and without controlled-traffic farming. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47, 603–612.

de Souza GS, de Souza ZM, da Silva RB, Barbosa RS, Araujo FS (2014) Effects of traffic control on the soil physical quality and the cultivation of sugarcane. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38, 135–146.
Effects of traffic control on the soil physical quality and the cultivation of sugarcane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhs1ygtrzL&md5=4377f9338ee4f0e56303e602c233332dCAS |

de Souza GS, de Souza ZM, Cooper M, Tormena CA (2015) Controlled traffic and soil physical quality of an Oxisol under sugarcane cultivation. Scientia Agrícola 72, 270–277.
Controlled traffic and soil physical quality of an Oxisol under sugarcane cultivation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Wit CT (1965) ‘Photosynthesis of leaf canopies.’ Agriculture Research Report No. 663. (Pudoc: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) ‘Yield response to water.’ Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33. (FAO: Rome)

Egli DB, Hatfield JL (2014) Yield and yield gaps in central US corn production systems. Agronomy Journal 106, 2248–2254.
Yield and yield gaps in central US corn production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

EMBRAPA (2015) Agritempo. Agrometeorological monitoring system. EMBRAPA, Brazil. Available at: www.agritempo.gov.br/agritempo/ (accessed 3 October 2015).

Evans LT (1993) ‘Crop evolution, adaptation and yield.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

FAO (2007) Digital soil world map. FAO, Rome. Available at: www.fao.org/soils-portal/en/ (accessed 20 April 2014).

FAO (2015) FAOSTAT. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed 3 October 2015).

Franchini JC, Crispino CC, Souza RA, Torres E, Hungria M (2007) Microbiological parameters as indicators of soil quality under various tillage and crop-rotation systems in Southern Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 92, 18–29.
Microbiological parameters as indicators of soil quality under various tillage and crop-rotation systems in Southern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

García-Lopez J, Lorite IJ, García-Ruiz R, Domínguez J (2014) Evaluation of three simulation approaches for assessing yield of rainfed sunflower in a Mediterranean environment for climate change impact modelling. Climatic Change 162, 124–147.

Gava GJD, Silva MD, da Silva RC, Jeronimo EM, Cruz JCS, Kolln OT (2011) Productivity of three sugarcane cultivars under dry and drip irrigated management. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 15, 250–255.
Productivity of three sugarcane cultivars under dry and drip irrigated management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gomathi R, Yukashini K, Shiyamala S, Vasantha S, Suganya A, Rakkiyappan P (2013) Induced response of sugarcane variety Co 86032 for thermotolerance. Sugar Technology 15, 17–26.
Induced response of sugarcane variety Co 86032 for thermotolerance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtVajtLfF&md5=00310a7d43f1c56ce8b28541da90eb5aCAS |

Gouvêa JRF, Sentelhas PC, Gazzola ST, Santos MC (2009) Climate changes and technological advances: impacts on sugarcane productivity in tropical southern Brazil. Scientia Agrícola 66, 593–605.
Climate changes and technological advances: impacts on sugarcane productivity in tropical southern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Grassini P, Torrion JA, Cassman KG, Yang HSS, Specht JE (2014) Drivers of spatial and temporal variation in soybean yield and irrigation requirements in the western US Corn Belt. Field Crops Research 163, 32–46.
Drivers of spatial and temporal variation in soybean yield and irrigation requirements in the western US Corn Belt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heinemann AB, Sentelhas PC (2011) Environmental group identification for upland rice production in central Brazil. Scientia Agrícola 68, 540–547.
Environmental group identification for upland rice production in central Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

IBGE (2015) Sistema de Recuperação automática (SIDRA). IGGE, Brazil. Available at: www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/ (accessed 3 October 2015).

Inman-Bamber NG (1991) A growth model for sugarcane based on a simple carbon balance and the CERES-Maize water balance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 8, 93–99.

Inman-Bamber NG, Smith DM (2005) Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research 92, 185–202.
Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Inman-Bamber NG, Singels A, Muchow RC (1998) A systems approach to benchmarking for sugarcane production in Australia and South Africa. Proceedings South African Sugar Technologists Association 72, 3–9.

Keating BA, Robertson MJ, Muchow R, Huth NI (1999) Modelling sugarcane production systems. I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Research 61, 253–271.
Modelling sugarcane production systems. I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Licker R, Johnston M, Foley JA, Barford C, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N (2010) Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography 19, 769–782.
Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB (2009) Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34, 179–204.
Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes and causes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Machado RS, Ribeiro RV, Marchiori PER, Machado DFSP, Machado EC, Landell MGA (2009) Respostas biométricas e fisiológicas ao déficit hídrico em cana-de-açúcar em diferentes fases fenológicas. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44, 1575–1582.
Respostas biométricas e fisiológicas ao déficit hídrico em cana-de-açúcar em diferentes fases fenológicas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marin FR, Carvalho GL (2012) Spatio-temporal variability of sugarcane yield efficiency in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47, 149–156.
Spatio-temporal variability of sugarcane yield efficiency in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marin FR, Jones JW, Royce F, Suguitani C, Donzeli JL, Pallone WJ, Nassif DSP (2011) Parameterization and evaluation of predictions of DSSAT/CANEGRO for Brazilian sugarcane. Agronomy Journal 103, 304–315.
Parameterization and evaluation of predictions of DSSAT/CANEGRO for Brazilian sugarcane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Medeiros DB, da Silva EC, Nogueira RJMC, Teixeira MM, Buckeridge MS (2013) Physiological limitations in two sugarcane varieties under water suppression and after recovering. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology 25, 213–222.
Physiological limitations in two sugarcane varieties under water suppression and after recovering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monteiro LA (2015). Sugarcane yield gap in Brazil: a crop modelling approach. PhD Dissertation. University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Monteiro LA, Sentelhas PC (2014) Potential and actual sugarcane yields in southern Brazil as a function of climate conditions and crop management. Sugar Technology 16, 264–276.
Potential and actual sugarcane yields in southern Brazil as a function of climate conditions and crop management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Naidu LGK, Hunsigi G (2003) Sugarcane yield gap analysis. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16, 4–12.

Neumann K, Verburg PH, Stehfest E, Muller C (2010) The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis. Agricultural Systems 103, 316–326.
The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ng Cheong LR, Kwong KFNK, Koon PDA, Du Preez CC (2009) Changes in an Inceptisol of Mauritius after rock removal for sugar cane production. Soil & Tillage Research 104, 88–96.
Changes in an Inceptisol of Mauritius after rock removal for sugar cane production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Leary GJ (2000) A review of three sugarcane simulation models with respect to their prediction of sucrose yield. Field Crops Research 68, 97–111.
A review of three sugarcane simulation models with respect to their prediction of sucrose yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paulino J, Zolin CA, Bertonha A, Freitas PSL, Folegatti MV (2011) Exploratory study of the stillage use along the time.II. Characteristics of the sugarcane crop. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental
Exploratory study of the stillage use along the time.II. Characteristics of the sugarcane crop.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pereira AR, Angelocci LR, Sentelhas PC (2002) ‘Agrometeorologia: Fundamentos e aplicações práticas.’ (Agropecuária: Guaíba, RS, Brazil)

Prado H (2013) ‘Pedologia fácil: aplicação em solos tropicais.’ 4th edn (O Autor: Piracicaba, SP)

Raes D, Geerts S, Kipkorir E, Wellens J, Sahli A (2006) Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agricultural Water Management 81, 335–357.
Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rao NH, Sarma PBS, Chander AS (1988) A simple dated water-production function for use in irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Water Management 13, 25–32.
A simple dated water-production function for use in irrigated agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson MJ, Inman-Bamber NG, Muchow RC, Wood AW (1999) Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit. Field Crops Research 64, 211–227.
Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sentelhas PC, Battisti R, Câmara GMS, Farias JRB, Hampf AC, Nendel C (2015) The soybean yield gap in Brazil: magnitude, causes and possible solutions for sustainable production. The Journal of Agricultural Science 1, 1–18.

Silva MD, Arantes MT, Rhein AFD, Gava GJC, Kolln OT (2014) Yield potential of sugarcane under drip irrigation in function of varieties and crop cycles. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 18, 241–249.
Yield potential of sugarcane under drip irrigation in function of varieties and crop cycles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singels A, Jones M, van Den Berg M (2008) ‘DSSAT v4.5—Canegrow sugarcane plant module: scientific documentation.’ (South African Sugarcane Research Institute: Mount Edgecombe, South Africa)

Smith DM, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ (2005) Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Research 78, 151–164.

Stackhouse P (2010) Prediction of worldwide energy resource. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA. Available at: http://power.larc.nasa.gov (accessed 14 July 2015).

Streck NA, Hanauer JG, Gabriel LF, Buske TC, Langner JA (2010) Leaf development and growth of selected sugarcane clones in a subtropical environment. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 45, 1049–1057.
Leaf development and growth of selected sugarcane clones in a subtropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) ‘The water balance.’ (Drexel Institute of Technology: Philadelphia)

van den Berg M, Singels A (2013) Modelling and monitoring for strategic yield gap diagnosis in the South African sugar belt. Field Crops Research 143, 143–150.
Modelling and monitoring for strategic yield gap diagnosis in the South African sugar belt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Ittersum MK, Rabbinge R (1997) Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crops Research 52, 197–208.
Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review. Field Crops Research 143, 4–17.
Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Verissimo MAA, Silva SDDE, Aires RF, Daros E, Panziera W (2012) Adaptability and stability of early sugarcane genotypes in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47, 561–568.
Adaptability and stability of early sugarcane genotypes in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Willmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O’Donnell J, Rowe CM (1985) Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research 90, 8995–9005.
Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xiong W, Holman I, Conway D, Lin E, Li Y (2008) A crop model across calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies. Ecological Modelling 213, 365–380.
A crop model across calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yamada ESM, Sentelhas PC (2014) Agro-climatic zoning of Jatropha curcas as a subside for crop planning and implementation in Brazil. International Journal of Biometeorology 58, 1995–2010.
Agro-climatic zoning of Jatropha curcas as a subside for crop planning and implementation in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zolin CA, Folegatti MV, Mingoti R, Sanchez-Roman RM, Paulino J, Gonzales AMGO (2011) Soil loss minimization as a function of forest size and location in a ‘Water Conservation Program’. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 35, 2157–2166.
Soil loss minimization as a function of forest size and location in a ‘Water Conservation Program’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |