Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Factors influencing the soil-test calibration for Colwell P and wheat under winter-dominant rainfall

Mark Conyers https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9811-4679 A D , Richard Bell https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-3755 B and Michael Bell C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A 11 Finch Place, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

B Sustainable Land Management, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

C School of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: mconyers@bigpond.net.au

Crop and Pasture Science 71(2) 113-118 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP19375
Submitted: 11 September 2019  Accepted: 5 December 2019   Published: 26 February 2020

Abstract

Critical ranges for soil tests are based on results that inevitably involve some broad variance around the fitted relationship. Some of the variation is related to field-based factors affecting crop response to nutrients in the soil and some to the efficiency of the soil-test extractant itself. Most attempts to improve soil tests focus on the extractant, whereas here, we explore the variation that could be accounted for by field-based factors in the soil-test calibration relationship between Colwell phosphorus (P) and wheat yield, using the Australian Better Fertiliser Decisions for Crops database—the biggest dataset available for this relationship. Calibrations developed from this dataset have been criticised, and so we aimed to explore factors accounting for more of the variation in the relationships for the dryland, winter-dominant rainfall region of southern New South Wales.

As reported previously, soil type was shown to influence the critical range and r-value for the Colwell P soil-test calibration for P responses by wheat. We also identified a tendency for dry conditions, at sowing or during the season, to lower relative yields for a given soil-test value, indicating increased reliance on fertiliser P over soil P. A similar trend was evident for later sowing date, again suggesting an increased probability of crop P requirements being met from the fertiliser P. However, additional records need to be generated to establish definitively that early sowing or subsurface P reserves minimise response to fertiliser P. In general, factors that influence crop access to soil P will have an impact on response to fertiliser P.

Although this analysis shows that it is possible to ‘tighten’ the response curve for Colwell P and wheat by restricting the data for a given soil type to ideal management and seasonal conditions, the ‘outliers’ that are excluded frequently reflect an important subset of environmental conditions encountered by wheat crops in dryland agriculture.

Additional keywords: BFDC, crop nutrition, national database, nutrient management.


References

Batten GD, Fettell NA, Mead JA, Khan MA (1999) Effect of sowing date on the uptake and utilisation of phosphorus by wheat (cv. Osprey) grown in central New South wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 161–170.
Effect of sowing date on the uptake and utilisation of phosphorus by wheat (cv. Osprey) grown in central New South wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell MJ, Moody PW, Anderson GC, Strong W (2013a) Soil phosphorus – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for oilseeds, grain legumes and summer cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 499–513.
Soil phosphorus – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for oilseeds, grain legumes and summer cereal crops grown in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell R, Reuter DJ, Scott BJ, Sparrow L, Strong W, the late Wen Chen (2013b) Soil phosphorus – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for winter cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 480–498.
Soil phosphorus – crop response calibration relationships and criteria for winter cereal crops grown in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burkitt LL, Moody PW, Gourley CJP, Hannah MC (2002) A simple phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 497–513.
A simple phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South wales by soil analysis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 3, 190–197.
The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South wales by soil analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Colwell JD, Esdaile RJ (1968) The calibration, interpretation, and evaluation of tests for the phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in northern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Soil Research 6, 105–120.
The calibration, interpretation, and evaluation of tests for the phosphorus fertiliser requirements of wheat in northern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Conyers MK (1999) Factors affecting soil test interpretation. In ‘Soil analysis: an interpretation manual’. (Eds KI Peverill, LA Sparrow, DJ Reuter) pp. 23–34 (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Conyers MK, Bell MJ, Wilhelm NS, Bell R, Norton RM, Walker C (2013) Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems (BFDC): knowledge gaps and lessons learnt. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 539–547.
Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems (BFDC): knowledge gaps and lessons learnt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Correndo AA, Salvagiotti F, Garcia FO, Gutierrez-Boem FH (2017) A modification of the arcsine-log calibration curve for analysing soil test value-relative yield relationships. Crop & Pasture Science 68, 297–304.
A modification of the arcsine-log calibration curve for analysing soil test value-relative yield relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dyson CB, Conyers MK (2013) Methodology for online biometric analysis of soil test – crop response datasets. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 435–441.
Methodology for online biometric analysis of soil test – crop response datasets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fixen P, Norton R, Pritchard K, Watmuff G (2019) BFDC – an Australian Soil Test Calibration Database Success. In ‘American Society of Agronomy Conference’. San Antonio, TX, 11–13 November 2019.

Holford ICR, Cullis BR (1985) An evaluation of eight soil phosphate extractants on acidic wheat-growing soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 23, 647–653.
An evaluation of eight soil phosphate extractants on acidic wheat-growing soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (1996) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Jordan-Meille L, Rubaek GH, Elhert PAI, Genot V, Hofman G, Goulding K, Recknagel J, Provolo G, Barraclough P (2012) An overview of fertilizer-P recommendations in Europe: soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations. Soil Use and Management 28, 419–435.
An overview of fertilizer-P recommendations in Europe: soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mason S, McDonald G (2019) Time of sowing effects on phosphorus requirements of two different wheat varieties. In ‘Proceedings of the 2019 Agronomy Australia Conference’. 25–29 August 2019, Wagga Wagga, Australia. www.agronomyaustralia.org/conference-proceedings.

Mason S, Mc Neill A, McLaughlin MJ, Zhang H (2010) Prediction of wheat response to an application of phosphorus under field conditions using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and extraction methods. Plant and Soil 337, 243–258.
Prediction of wheat response to an application of phosphorus under field conditions using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and extraction methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moody PW (2007) Interpretation of a single-point P buffering index for adjusting critical levels of Colwell P soil test. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 55–62.
Interpretation of a single-point P buffering index for adjusting critical levels of Colwell P soil test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norton RM, Watmuff G, Dyson C, Conyers M, Bell M, Wilhelm N, Bell R, Dowling C, Walker C, Peverill K (2015) Better Fertilizer Decisions for Crops: Developments of a National Web-Based Database to Support Soil Test Calibration. In ‘Synergies in Science: Partnering for Solutions. ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meetings’. Minneapolis, MN, USA. https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/ 2015am/webprogram/ Session14696.html

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods – Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Speirs SD, Reuter DJ, Peverill KI, Brennan RF (2013a) Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems in Australia: an overview. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 417–423.
Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems in Australia: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Speirs SD, Scott BJ, Moody PW, Mason SD (2013b) Soil phosphorus tests II: A comparison of soil test – crop response relationships for different soil tests and wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 469–479.
Soil phosphorus tests II: A comparison of soil test – crop response relationships for different soil tests and wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Watmuff G, Reuter DJ, Speirs SD (2013) Methodologies for assembling and interrogating N, P, K and S soil test calibrations for Australian cereal, oilseed and pulse crops. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 424–434.
Methodologies for assembling and interrogating N, P, K and S soil test calibrations for Australian cereal, oilseed and pulse crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |