Articles citing this paper
Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. II. Inter-relations between epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, relative water content, and plant survival
A. T. James A , R. J. Lawn B D and M. Cooper C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now CSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., PO Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email Robert.Lawn@jcu.edu.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(7) 670-678 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07160
Submitted: 19 April 2007 Accepted: 18 March 2008 Published: 3 July 2008
25 articles found in Crossref database.
A comparative proteomic study of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive soybean seedlings under drought stress
Yu X.,
James A. T.,
Yang A.,
Jones A.,
Mendoza-Porras O.,
Bétrix C.-A.,
Ma H., Colgrave M. L.
Crop and Pasture Science. 2016 67(5). p.528
Soybean development under soil water deficit
Marcelo Simeão,
Aderson Soares de Andrade Junior,
Everaldo Moreira da Silva,
Aureliano de Albuquerque Ribeiro, Edson Alves Bastos
African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018 13(15). p.771
Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought Resistance in Soybean
Manavalan L. P.,
Guttikonda S. K.,
Phan Tran L.-S., Nguyen H. T.
Plant and Cell Physiology. 2009 50(7). p.1260
Exogenous ABA Induces Osmotic Adjustment, Improves Leaf Water Relations and Water Use Efficiency, But Not Yield in Soybean under Water Stress
He Jin,
Jin Yi,
Palta Jairo A.,
Liu Hong-Yan,
Chen Zhu, Li Feng-Min
Agronomy. 2019 9(7). p.395
Review: An integrated framework for crop adaptation to dry environments: Responses to transient and terminal drought
Berger Jens,
Palta Jairo, Vadez Vincent
Plant Science. 2016 253 p.58
Overexpression of Glycine soja WRKY20 enhances drought tolerance and improves plant yields under drought stress in transgenic soybean
Ning Wenfeng,
Zhai Hong,
Yu Jinqiu,
Liang Shuang,
Yang Xue,
Xing Xueying,
Huo Jianling,
Pang Tian,
Yang Yanling, Bai Xi
Molecular Breeding. 2017 37(2).
Dehydration survival of crop plants and its measurement
Blum Abraham, Tuberosa Roberto
Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018 69(5). p.975
Agricultural adjuvants may impair leaf transpiration and photosynthetic activity
Räsch Anna,
Hunsche Mauricio,
Mail Matthias,
Burkhardt Jürgen,
Noga Georg, Pariyar Shyam
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018 132 p.229
Strategies to deal with drought-stress in biological nitrogen fixation in soybean
Freitas Vanessa Fogaça de,
Cerezini Paula,
Hungria Mariangela, Nogueira Marco Antonio
Applied Soil Ecology. 2022 172 p.104352
Use of DArT molecular markers for QTL analysis of drought-stress responses in soybean. II. Marker identification and QTL analyses
Vu Hang T. T.,
Kilian A.,
James A. T.,
Bielig L. M., Lawn R. J.
Crop and Pasture Science. 2015 66(8). p.817
Transcriptome and methylome changes in two contrasting mungbean genotypes in response to drought stress
Zhao Peilei,
Ma Bao,
Cai Chunmei, Xu Jihua
BMC Genomics. 2022 23(1).
Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. III. Broad-sense heritability of epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content
James A. T.,
Lawn R. J., Cooper M.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008 59(7). p.679
Genotypic differences in leaf area maintenance contribute to differences in recovery from water stress in soybean
Lawn R. J., Likoswe A. A.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008 59(12). p.1075
Comparative metabolomics of drought acclimation in model and forage legumes
SANCHEZ DIEGO H.,
SCHWABE FRANZISKA,
ERBAN ALEXANDER,
UDVARDI MICHAEL K., KOPKA JOACHIM
Plant, Cell & Environment. 2012 35(1). p.136
Water restriction and physiological traits in soybean genotypes contrasting for nitrogen fixation drought tolerance
Cerezini Paula,
Fagotti Dáfila dos Santos Lima,
Pípolo Antonio Eduardo,
Hungria Mariangela, Nogueira Marco Antonio
Scientia Agricola. 2017 74(2). p.110
Comportamento de genótipos de soja submetidos a déficit hídrico intenso em casa de vegetação
Fioreze Samuel Luiz,
Pivetta Laerte Gustavo,
Fano Ademir,
Machado Fábio Ribeiro, Guimarães Vandeir Francisco
Revista Ceres. 2011 58(3). p.342
Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicle Data as an Effective Tool for the Evaluation of Ancient Khorasan and Modern Kabot Spring Wheat Varieties under Different Tillage Systems
Balážová Kristýna,
Kumhálová Jitka, Chyba Jan
Agronomy. 2024 14(1). p.147
Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. I. Variation in soybean and wild Glycine spp. for epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, and relative water content
James A. T.,
Lawn R. J., Cooper M.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008 59(7). p.656
Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: 40 years of progress
Turner Neil C
Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018 69(13). p.3223
Genetic variation in peanut leaf maintenance and transpiration recovery from severe soil drying
Rosas-Anderson Pablo,
Shekoofa Avat,
Sinclair Thomas R.,
Balota Maria,
Isleib Thomas G.,
Tallury Shyam, Rufty Thomas
Field Crops Research. 2014 158 p.65
Old and New Cultivars of Soya Bean (Glycine max L.) Subjected to Soil Drying Differ in Abscisic Acid Accumulation, Water Relations Characteristics and Yield
He J.,
Du Y.‐L.,
Wang T.,
Turner N. C.,
Xi Y., Li F.‐M.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2016 202(5). p.372
Fisiologia e produção da soja tratada com cinetina e cálcio sob deficit hídrico e sombreamento
Fioreze Samuel Luiz,
Rodrigues João Domingos,
Carneiro João Paulo Costa,
Silva André do Amaral, Lima Marcelo Bruno
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2013 48(11). p.1432
Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments (2011)
Use of DArT molecular markers for QTL analysis of drought-stress responses in soybean. I. Phenotypic evaluation of traits
Vu Hang T. T.,
James A. T.,
Lawn R. J.,
Bielig L. M., Kilian A.
Crop and Pasture Science. 2015 66(8). p.802
Dark-adapted leaf conductance, but not minimum leaf conductance, predicts water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)
Walden-Coleman Alison E.,
Rajcan Istvan, Earl Hugh J.
Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2013 93(1). p.13
